Macromedia Flash Server - RE: Just Installed FCS 1.5 on

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Macromedia Flash Server > October 2005 > RE: Just Installed FCS 1.5 on





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author RE: Just Installed FCS 1.5 on
Edward Chan

2005-10-29, 5:45 pm

The <AppsDir> tag in Vhost.xml points to where your applications are
defined. Note: this does not mean where the swf's are. Remember, to
define an application in the server, you need a directory with the same
name as your app, under the directory pointed to by <AppsDir>. This
will define your app. For example,

<AppsDir>/opt/macromedia/fcs/applications</AppsDir>

If you wanted to connect to an app named "foo", you would need to have
the following directory

/opt/macromedia/fcs/applications/foo

Any server-side logic (i.e. server-side scripts) need to go into this
directory. This is all independent of where the swf that connects to
FCS lives or is served from, which may or may not be on the same
machine.

Also under /opt/macromedia/fcs/applications/foo will be where your
recorded streams and persistent shared objects go

/opt/macromedia/fcs/applications/foo/streams/<inst>
/opt/macromedia/fcs/applications/foo/sharedobjects/<inst>


Hope this helps.

Ed

> -----Original Message-----
> From: flashcomm-bounces-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org=20
> [mailto:flashcomm-bounces-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of=20
> Aaron Roberson
> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 2:07 PM
> To: FlashComm Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [FlashComm] Just Installed FCS 1.5 on=20
> LinuxServerbutexperiencingcomplications
>=20
> I am setting up video streaming for our company website, they=20
> are my employers, not my clients. I'm not sure if that=20
> changes things a whole lot, but the real concern of mine is=20
> that site visitors will have a bad experience if the app=20
> server is unstable.
>=20
> I wasn't suggeting that MM remove both caps, just the=20
> bandwidth cap. I don't mind the concurrent use cap, it is=20
> much more reasonable than being double charged for bandwidth,=20
> as you stated.
>=20
> Any ideas on why my sample apps are not working? Better yet,=20
> what do I have to do to make sure this same problem doesn't=20
> arrise when I create my own apps and place them in the folder=20
> (s) of my choice?
>=20
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>=20
> On 10/28/05, Bill Sanders <wdsanders-Wuw85uim5zDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> caps is that=20
> allowed--except=20
> paying for the=20
> been running=20
> on Fedora,=20
> my Linux=20
> cpu license=20
> anything like that=20
> I specified=20
> is defined=20
> not sure of=20
> Linux Server=20
> Server but=20
> (Personal Edition)!!!
>=20
> =3D---------------------------------------------------------
> Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
> =3D---------------------------------------------------------
>=20
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>=20


=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------

To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com