| Stefan Richter 2005-11-28, 5:54 pm |
| Certainly possible but it can be pretty heavy on the CPU.
In Actionscript 3 this will be easier, you can then convert your bitmapdata
to png or jpg within Flash(!) before sending it to the server.
http://www.kaourantin.net/2005/10/p...der-in-as3.html
Not sure how much the capture phase can be improved though.
Stefan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: flashcomm-bounces-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org [mailto:flashcomm-
> bounces-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Robert Sandie
> Sent: 28 November 2005 16:56
> To: FlashComm Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [FlashComm] (no subject)
>
> Your right, he was asking about JPEG->FLV, but I did want to address
> this topic. I have been thinking about this in my latest project:
>
> Instead of using the FLIX engine to generate JPEG's, how would the
> quality/speed compare with a SWF crawler to dynamically create JPEGs.
> Hmmm... anyone taken this route before?
>
> -Rob
>
> Stefan Richter wrote:
>
> found
> costing
>
>
> =-----------------------------------------------------------
> Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
> =-----------------------------------------------------------
>
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
|