| Beto A 2005-11-28, 5:54 pm |
| Maybe we should hold an election ....lol who should be on the CAB??
=20
=20
Stefan Richter <stefan-fMeCE+ULXElEfu+5ix1nRw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
I'd like to add that the limit of 3 vhosts could be a potential showsto=
pper
for some license holders. These people will have no choice than to wait f=
or
the final license confirmation - and if that still includes this very tou=
gh
vhost limit then some people may be in trouble.
Dropping features from the product is wrong. What will the upgrade path b=
e
for someone managing a few dozen vhosts? Potentially devastating stuff. I=
t's
like limiting the Flash IDE to 20 movieclips on stage for no apparent rea=
son
(other than to get you to buy the unlimited uber-IDE at 10 times the pric=
e).
I welcome the fact that MM is (now, finally) listening. However they have
noone else to blame for this mess than themselves. The new, proposed
licensing is along the lines of what I would have expected in the first
place (and I did try to influence the licensing by making suggestions way
before it was announced) and while things are looking more positive now t=
han
they used to a few weeks ago I don't feel it's time for the red carpet
treatment.
So far so good MM but still plenty of room for improvement. Should I be o=
n
the advisory board I will make sure to let them know that the licensing i=
s
still not up to scratch. The advisory is again a welcome move but could h=
ave
happened much much earlier.=20
All features of FCS 1.5 should remain and be expandeded upon, not cut bac=
k.=20
Stefan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: flashcomm-bounces-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org [mailto:flashcomm-
> bounces-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of hank williams
> Sent: 28 November 2005 20:38
> To: FlashComm Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [FlashComm] FMS 2 Licensing Update
>=20
> Jeez,
>=20
> It sounds like the old cliche, you can please some of the people some
> of the time but you cant please all of the people all of the time.
>=20
> I mean, really. Can you point to another company that has any kind of
> a similar concept where they just put all their business planning and
> strategy out for a public mailing list to discuss. I am not sure what
> exactly what you think would be better, but all the options that I can
> think of that would satisfy your request seem ludicrous. Now, that
> said, I agree that I may not have thought of what you are thinking of.
> So perhaps a specific suggestion would be better than just
> complaining. Of course that leaves you open to your specific idea
> actually being labeled ludicrous 
>=20
> Regards
> Hank
>=20
> On 11/28/05, ryanm wrote:
xt[vbcol=seagreen]
> marketing.
> as a
he[vbcol=seagreen]
> last
at[vbcol=seagreen]
> they
> sample?
how[vbcol=seagreen]
> are
ou[vbcol=seagreen]
o[vbcol=seagreen]
> it's
> going
>=20
> =3D---------------------------------------------------------
> Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
> =3D---------------------------------------------------------
>=20
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
=20
=09
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
|