| Stefan Richter 2005-12-17, 7:45 am |
| I have learned that multicast over the internet does not work. Not with any
server, on any platform. So unless your audience is intranet/LAN based then
I fail to see how multicasting will help.
I personally would like to see multi-bitrate (if that's the right term for
it) support and screensharing implemented first.
Of course multicast support would be nice to have on the feature list too.
Stefan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: flashcomm-bounces-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org
> [mailto:flashcomm-bounces-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of
> Andy Lewis
> Sent: 16 December 2005 23:20
> To: 'FlashComm Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [FlashComm] Wake up call for MM: multicasting
>
> But if Adobe were to support multicast in FMS, how would they
> limit the amount of connections you are allowed for your
> dollar? If they supported multicast with the personal edition
> (if that still exists) the professional edition would not add
> much value.
>
> I too am looking forward to seeing a better licensing scheme
> as right now it is still too expensive for me to offer my
> customers FMS without going through our competition to use
> their edge/origin setup. Apparently I am way off their radar
> until I am willing to spend loadsamoney.
>
> I am waiting patiently though and in the meantime shifting
> many, many terabytes using Windows Media and Real.
>
> Cheers
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: flashcomm-bounces-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org
> [mailto:flashcomm-bounces-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of
> Aaron Roberson
> Sent: 16 December 2005 18:19
> To: FlashComm Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [FlashComm] Wake up call for MM
>
> Asa,
>
> We are trying to be patient, we really are. Outburst like
> this may come from time to time, but please just take them as
> a reminder that the developer community is looking around for
> viable options/alternatives but we really do want to see FMS
> 2 come full circle on it's capabilities and pricing.
>
> After a conversation I had with another developer, I am
> wondering what is being done, if anything, to support
> multicast streaming in FMS? With the new media incentive, it
> seems that both on2 live encoding and multicasting is the
> logical next step.
>
> -Aaron
>
> On 12/16/05, Asa Whillock <awhilloc-dv/VyGpifdQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> an excited
> and the CAB
> hurt, but I
> technology.
> better for
> FMS tech
> players will
>
> =---------------------------------------------------------
> Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
> =---------------------------------------------------------
>
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>
>
> =-----------------------------------------------------------
> Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
> =-----------------------------------------------------------
>
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>
=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
|