| Simon Skrødal 2005-04-19, 2:45 am |
| ....I think I have answered my own question... and I think I was right in =
my
initial assumption.
The broadcast bandwidth usage does count, but on first run the FCS seem t=
o
allow the bw limit to be breached.
However, upon disconnecting either application (broadcast/receiver) and t=
hen
reconnecting, FCS refuses to play; "Current server bandwidth usage exceed=
s
license limit set. Rejecting connection.".
How long is the delay, before FCS allows connections again? I seem to
remember it being 15 minutes?
BTW, the bandwidth findings are my assumptions - if you have anything to
add/correct, please let me know.
Thanks,
Simon Skr=F8dal
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Skr=F8dal" <simon-fOXyMSD3e6XvnOemgxGiVw@public.gmane.org>
To: "FlashComm Mailing List" <flashcomm-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: [FlashComm] Camera bandwidth
> Dear Dario and Bill (Sanders),
>
> Thanks for your insights w/regards to camera/audio bandwidth, it makes
> complete sense, although I still recon the docs on the matter are a lit=
tle
> fuzzy.
>
> I have another question related to bandwidth. Playing with live video
> streams, I have experienced the following (using the developers ed. of =
FCS
> 1.5.):
>
> - I have two video applications; One that broadcasts a video stream and
one
> that receives it (all happening live)
> - The broadcast video quality is set to stream at 26250Bps, or 210kbps.
This
> is confirmed when retrieving bandwidth usage from camera at runtime.
>
> One would (or at least I would) expect that running the broadcaster and
the
> receiver at the same time would result in a bandwidth usage of at least
> 210kbps*2 =3D 420kbps. This is excluding audio and other overheads. Kno=
wing
> that the developers edition limits the stream to 250kbps, how is this
> possible?
>
> Question is: Am I wrong in assuming that broadcasting a video stream
counts
> towards the FCS bandwidth limit?
>
> Sincerely,
> Simon Skr=F8dal
>
> PS! On a sidenote, with regards to the merging of Adobe and MM: Adobe a=
lso
> bought out Syntrillium, who made great audio software, such as CoolEdit=
..
> Adobe rebranded CoolEdit, and discontinued all the other Syntrillium
> products 
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dario De Agostini" <dario-GCN6p6BpY0//wltNWqQaag@public.gmane.org>
> To: "FlashComm Mailing List" <flashcomm-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 5:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [FlashComm] Camera bandwidth
>
>
> anywhere
outgoing[vbcol=seagreen]
> set/monitor
video[vbcol=seagreen]
the[vbcol=seagreen]
to[vbcol=seagreen]
> play
ich[vbcol=seagreen]
> is
very[vbcol=seagreen]
w[vbcol=seagreen]
> will
al[vbcol=seagreen]
> time
>
>
> =3D-----------------------------------------------------------
> Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
> =3D-----------------------------------------------------------
>
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>
=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
|