|
Home > Archive > Macromedia Flash Server > May 2005 > Too many snapshots = server overhead?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Too many snapshots = server overhead?
|
|
| Wilton Rossi 2005-05-30, 5:45 pm |
| Hello!
We're working on a webconference application where
users can create a snapshot using the netstream object
while logging in. That snapshot is used to help
identification. It's working really fine but we
started to worry with the exponential increase in the
number of netstreams that are maintained to display
those snapshots to multiple users. During one of our
tests we reached the amazing amount of more than 1,000
streams with a few dozens of users.
As I said, it still works fine nonetheless. The thing
I'd like to know is if the exponential increase of
netstreams can contribute to increase server overhead
to a considerable extent - despite the fact that all
they're playing is a single frame, being therefore
idle.=20
We've considered the possibility of either closing or
pausing the netstream after playing the snapshot
stream, but it didn't work properly in any case. To
our dismay, some of the snapshots would be displayed
and others wouldn't. So if someone can also contribute
with a different idea, we'd appreciate it.
Regards,
W
=09
__________________________________=20
Do you Yahoo!?=20
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.=20
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
| |
| Stefan Richter 2005-05-30, 5:45 pm |
| Try serving the flv progressively instead.
Stefan
-----Original Message-----
From: flashcomm-bounces-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org
[mailto:flashcomm-bounces-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Wilton Rossi
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 4:36 PM
To: FlashComm Mailing List
Subject: [FlashComm] Too many snapshots = server overhead?
Hello!
We're working on a webconference application where users can create a
snapshot using the netstream object while logging in. That snapshot is used
to help identification. It's working really fine but we started to worry
with the exponential increase in the number of netstreams that are
maintained to display those snapshots to multiple users. During one of our
tests we reached the amazing amount of more than 1,000 streams with a few
dozens of users.
As I said, it still works fine nonetheless. The thing I'd like to know is if
the exponential increase of netstreams can contribute to increase server
overhead to a considerable extent - despite the fact that all they're
playing is a single frame, being therefore idle.
We've considered the possibility of either closing or pausing the netstream
after playing the snapshot stream, but it didn't work properly in any case.
To our dismay, some of the snapshots would be displayed and others wouldn't.
So if someone can also contribute with a different idea, we'd appreciate it.
Regards,
W
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
|
|
|
|
|