Macromedia Flash Server - Re: What FlashCom features do you want in a future

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Macromedia Flash Server > August 2005 > Re: What FlashCom features do you want in a future





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: What FlashCom features do you want in a future
Beto A

2005-08-23, 2:45 am

Hank, I think your first one would be solved if we could mix streams Serv=
er side (as suggested earlier). like:
out_ns.AttachVideo(AudioStream1,AudioStream2);
=20
I think with video you may have to do a split like side to side if you kn=
ow what I mean, that may be too complex to handle.

hank williams <hank777-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
There are two big things I am looking for.

1. sycnronization of recorded streams. Right now you can create a
video conference but you cannot record and play that conference back.
This it seems to me is critical. The concept that you can have a
conference but not record it is a major missing piece.

2. I want to be able to gateway to other technologies such as h.264.
and SIP. This would allow flashcomm to become a hub for video calls
outside of flash. In this way, flash could become a true video switch.
>From a business perspective this would be powerful in that it would

really make flashcomm a potential solution for the much larger general
video and audio conferencing world. There is no reason to limit
flashcomms communication to just flash clients. Doing so would
dramatically increase the platform's revenue potential.

Regards
Hank

On 8/22/05, David Simmons wrote:
> At the risk of flooding my inbox, I'd like to ask the list for feature
> suggestions for Flash that are related to the Flash Communications
> Server.
>=20
> What do you want future versions of Flash to do with the server? What
> FCS feature did you want in Flash 8 that didn't show up there?
>=20
> I'll start the list with the obvious. You don't have to add "me too"
> for these:
>=20
> * Real-time VP6 video encoding for camera capture
> * Screen sharing
> * Everything faster and less CPU intensive
> * Fix the problem with video glitches that's been all over the
> list
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Please DON'T send requests for any of the following. I'll ignore you in
> any case if you're talking about :
>=20
> * Pure server features like AS2 support
> * Server pricing, bandwidth caps etc
> * Features not related to the Flash Communications Server (i.e,
> drawing functions)
>=20
>=20
> This is an informal survey only. There's no promise about any of this
> getting into Flash, but I'd like to hear what you think we should do fo=

r
> future Flash versions.
>=20
> Thanks,
>=20
> - Dave Simmons
> Macromedia Engineering
>=20
>=20
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>=20
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>


=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=3D-----------------------------------------------------------

To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm

________________________________________
__________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around=20
http://mail.yahoo.com=20

=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=3D-----------------------------------------------------------

To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com