| Simon Lord 2005-08-24, 8:45 pm |
| I'd like to add a nutty suggestion, it's a little over the top but if
we're all just spitting in the wind, I might as well also...
Seeing as how some people are hung up on the bandwidth issue, and
trading serial numbers isn't a real honest option, so I propose the
following...
( Mind you this *idea* would really only be valuable between people
that trust each other, but I digress...)
What if the admin server could somehow communicate with another admin
server located *wherever* to find out how much bandwidth that server
is *not* using in order to boost it's own BW limit when it needs to.
For instance, say Brian or Stefan are giving a presentation in a week
and they are tight for BW so I give them my IP and a password (I
enter their IP and the same password in my admin). Their admin
server can now call my admin server too see what I'm *not* using in
terms of FCS BW so it can boost its own.
Any bandwidth cost would be incurred by Brian or Stefan because
*their* FCS was temporarily boosted in bandwidth by the amount I
wasn't using (my FCS would be crippled by the amount *leant* to the
other FCS license(s)) - it's not actually directing streams to *my*
server. And I don't see how it could even be used as a crude form of
load balancing so it's of no real threat to large outfits or even MM.
But it does allow the little people to share resources for a short
amount of time while at the same time keeping people honest. If
several people on this list traded IP's it would mean they
*potentially* had access to a 70MB BW cap for a presentation.
I personally own a Pro license that uses 2% of my 2 Terabyte monthly
BW cap. So I could potentially be helping people on the list through
a tight spot quite easily if we had the means to do so.
On Aug 24, 2005, at 7:04 PM, MHarris-vppm1TVqICB/8ZyCq/8wuYdd74u8MsAO@public.gmane.org wrote:
> The ability for users on dialups to record high quality audio and
> video
> streams on their local machine, perhaps even offline, and upload
> them to the
> fcs server.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fabio Sonnati [mailto:sonnati-6XAXFxi7MR1y6ZJYwPuT2FaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 10:34 AM
> To: FlashComm Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [FlashComm] What FlashCom features do you want in
> afutureversionof Flash?
>
>
> FCS support H.263 and a Screen Video codec used, for example, by
> breeze to
> codec screen capture.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Naicu Octavian" <naicuoctavian-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> To: "FlashComm Mailing List" <flashcomm-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 6:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [FlashComm] What FlashCom features do you want in
> afutureversionof Flash?
>
>
>
>
>
> =-----------------------------------------------------------
> Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
> =-----------------------------------------------------------
>
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>
> =-----------------------------------------------------------
> Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
> =-----------------------------------------------------------
>
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>
=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
|