| Stefan Richter 2005-09-22, 8:46 pm |
| I don't know, all I know is that the client wants screensharing and that
they will not sign up with me because I can't deliver it (and I refuse to
hack something around FCS).
What I do know is that they will find someone else, be it Webex or Breeze or
whatever - even though the small featureset they asked for was easily
do-able in FCS (this client doesn't even need audio!), except for the
screensharing. For this client Breeze is an overkill yet they may go for it
due to the fact that they want a light and accessible player on the
clientside.
Stefan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: flashcomm-bounces-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org
> [mailto:flashcomm-bounces-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of
> Edward Chan
> Sent: 21 September 2005 22:34
> To: FlashComm Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [FlashComm] FCS too expensive! let's mass mail
> macromedia!!!
>
> Just curious, who did you lose out to?
>
=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
|