|
Home > Archive > Macromedia Flash Server > September 2005 > fms2 licensing: is this true?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
fms2 licensing: is this true?
|
|
| Alfonso Florio 2005-09-28, 5:51 pm |
| Is true that the FMS2 licensing is cpu based?
you buy a $5000 license for a server and you don't have bandwidth limitations?
=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
| |
| Ramses Moreno [cuatromedios] 2005-09-28, 5:51 pm |
| It seems that! not bandwidth limitation but limit to 5,000 users... not bad=
eh?
2005/9/28, Alfonso Florio <a.florio-hPLUXwcWdVo@public.gmane.org>:
> Is true that the FMS2 licensing is cpu based?
>
> you buy a $5000 license for a server and you don't have bandwidth limitat=
ions?
>
>
>
> =3D-----------------------------------------------------------
> Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
> =3D-----------------------------------------------------------
>
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>
--
Ramses Moreno
ramses-bs+ydo3BRmC6o3OwpzRdew@public.gmane.org
=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
| |
|
| > Is true that the FMS2 licensing is cpu based?
>
> you buy a $5000 license for a server and you don't have bandwidth
> limitations?
>
It's possible, but still unclear. The official anser is just "starting a
$4500", without any specifics. I know the beta has a bandwidth limit of like
5 megs or something.
ryanm
=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
| |
| Stefan Richter 2005-09-28, 5:51 pm |
| I haven't seen any userlimits being mentioned anywhere.
My guess is as good as anyones but from the press release it sounds that
licensing is per 2-CPU per Pro License.
Sounds like an improvement to me if this is the case.
Stefan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: flashcomm-bounces-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org
> [mailto:flashcomm-bounces-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of
> Ramses Moreno [cuatromedios]
> Sent: 28 September 2005 20:40
> To: FlashComm Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [FlashComm] fms2 licensing: is this true?
>
> It seems that! not bandwidth limitation but limit to 5,000
> users... not bad eh?
>
> 2005/9/28, Alfonso Florio <a.florio-hPLUXwcWdVo@public.gmane.org>:
> bandwidth limitations?
>
>
> --
> Ramses Moreno
> ramses-bs+ydo3BRmC6o3OwpzRdew@public.gmane.org
>
> =---------------------------------------------------------
> Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
> =---------------------------------------------------------
>
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>
=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
| |
| JesterXL 2005-09-28, 5:51 pm |
| The big question is will hosts honor that? Meaning, will MediaTemple,
Influxis, et. al. stop charging for bandwidth packages, and instead align it
with just user caps? I'd assume they'd at least lessen them significantly.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Richter" <stefan-fMeCE+ULXElEfu+5ix1nRw@public.gmane.org>
To: <ramses-bs+ydo3BRmC6o3OwpzRdew@public.gmane.org>; "'FlashComm Mailing List'"
<flashcomm-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 4:01 PM
Subject: RE: [FlashComm] fms2 licensing: is this true?
I haven't seen any userlimits being mentioned anywhere.
My guess is as good as anyones but from the press release it sounds that
licensing is per 2-CPU per Pro License.
Sounds like an improvement to me if this is the case.
Stefan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: flashcomm-bounces-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org
> [mailto:flashcomm-bounces-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of
> Ramses Moreno [cuatromedios]
> Sent: 28 September 2005 20:40
> To: FlashComm Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [FlashComm] fms2 licensing: is this true?
>
> It seems that! not bandwidth limitation but limit to 5,000
> users... not bad eh?
>
> 2005/9/28, Alfonso Florio <a.florio-hPLUXwcWdVo@public.gmane.org>:
> bandwidth limitations?
>
>
> --
> Ramses Moreno
> ramses-bs+ydo3BRmC6o3OwpzRdew@public.gmane.org
>
> =---------------------------------------------------------
> Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
> =---------------------------------------------------------
>
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>
=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
| |
|
| > The big question is will hosts honor that? Meaning, will MediaTemple,
> Influxis, et. al. stop charging for bandwidth packages, and instead align
> it
> with just user caps? I'd assume they'd at least lessen them
> significantly.
>
Heh... don't hold your breath.
ryanm
=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
| |
| Brian Lesser 2005-09-28, 5:51 pm |
| Hi Stefan,
Well, the public beta has a 5000 client limit:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/...er/public_beta/
"Unlimited bandwidth and up to 5,000 simultaneous connections."
Who knows?
Yours truly,
-Brian
Stefan Richter wrote:
>I haven't seen any userlimits being mentioned anywhere.
>My guess is as good as anyones but from the press release it sounds that
>licensing is per 2-CPU per Pro License.
>
>Sounds like an improvement to me if this is the case.
>
>Stefan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>=-----------------------------------------------------------
>Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
>=-----------------------------------------------------------
>
>To change your subscription options or search the archive:
>http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>
>
--
________________________________________
______________________________
Brian Lesser
Assistant Director, Teaching and Technology Support
Computing and Communications Services
Ryerson University
350 Victoria St.
Toronto, Ontario Phone: (416) 979-5000 ext. 6835
M5B 2K3 Fax: (416) 979-5220
Office: AB48D E-mail: blesser-6s6ziW1YCwCw5LPnMra/2Q@public.gmane.org
(Enter through LB66) Web: http://www.ryerson.ca/~blesser
________________________________________
______________________________
=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
| |
| Alfonso Florio 2005-09-28, 5:51 pm |
| Bandwidth is still a cost, flashcom limitations or not.
So maybe they will decrease prices (keeping same earnings) but bandwidth
packages will remain.
maybemaybe
At 22.36 28/09/2005, you wrote:
>The big question is will hosts honor that? Meaning, will MediaTemple,
>Influxis, et. al. stop charging for bandwidth packages, and instead align it
>with just user caps? I'd assume they'd at least lessen them significantly.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Stefan Richter" <stefan-fMeCE+ULXElEfu+5ix1nRw@public.gmane.org>
>To: <ramses-bs+ydo3BRmC6o3OwpzRdew@public.gmane.org>; "'FlashComm Mailing List'"
><flashcomm-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 4:01 PM
>Subject: RE: [FlashComm] fms2 licensing: is this true?
>
>
>I haven't seen any userlimits being mentioned anywhere.
>My guess is as good as anyones but from the press release it sounds that
>licensing is per 2-CPU per Pro License.
>
>Sounds like an improvement to me if this is the case.
>
>Stefan
>
>
>
>
>
>=-----------------------------------------------------------
>Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
>=-----------------------------------------------------------
>
>To change your subscription options or search the archive:
>http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>
>
>=-----------------------------------------------------------
>Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
>=-----------------------------------------------------------
>
>To change your subscription options or search the archive:
>http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
| |
| Aaron Roberson 2005-09-28, 8:45 pm |
| When I saw that the public beta has NO bandwidth limit I got very
excited... and then calmed down. I hope this is a sign that the
licensing has changed to per CPU but its not concrete yet.
Aaron
On 9/28/05, Alfonso Florio <a.florio-hPLUXwcWdVo@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Bandwidth is still a cost, flashcom limitations or not.
>
> So maybe they will decrease prices (keeping same earnings) but bandwidth
> packages will remain.
>
> maybemaybe
>
>
>
>
> At 22.36 28/09/2005, you wrote:
n it[vbcol=seagreen]
ly.[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>
> =3D-----------------------------------------------------------
> Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
> =3D-----------------------------------------------------------
>
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>
=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
| |
| Naicu Octavian 2005-09-28, 8:45 pm |
| The FCS2 beta has so many connections and no bandwith
limit so that you can all STRESS TEST (without any
such restrictions which eventually can be removed) all
those n way high quality video, very demanding,
applications I know you all are working on! 
--- Aaron Roberson <iisitedesign-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> When I saw that the public beta has NO bandwidth
> limit I got very
> excited... and then calmed down. I hope this is a
> sign that the
> licensing has changed to per CPU but its not
> concrete yet.
>=20
> Aaron
>=20
> On 9/28/05, Alfonso Florio <a.florio-hPLUXwcWdVo@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> not.
> earnings) but bandwidth
> Meaning, will MediaTemple,
> packages, and instead align it
> lessen them significantly.
> Mailing List'"
> true?
> anywhere.
> release it sounds that
> case.
> [mailto:flashcomm-bounces-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org] On
> Behalf Of
> this true?
> limit to 5,000
> based?
> don't have
>
=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.figleaf.com
>
=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
> search the archive:
>
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>
=3D---------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.figleaf.com
>
=3D---------------------------------------------------------
> the archive:
>
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>
>=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.figleaf.com
>
>=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
> archive:
>
>http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>
>=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.figleaf.com
>
>=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
> archive:
>
>http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>
=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.figleaf.com
>
=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
> archive:
>
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>=20
>
=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
> Supported by Fig Leaf Software -
> http://www.figleaf.com
>
=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
>=20
> To change your subscription options or search the
> archive:
>
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>=20
=09
__________________________________=20
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005=20
http://mail.yahoo.com
=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=3D-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
| |
|
| And how about upgrading? from FCS 1.5 how much for the cost
----- Original Message -----
From: "JesterXL" <jesterxl-RyEax5csP4NCVeB36W80OQ@public.gmane.org>
To: "FlashComm Mailing List" <flashcomm-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 4:36 AM
Subject: Re: [FlashComm] fms2 licensing: is this true?
> The big question is will hosts honor that? Meaning, will MediaTemple,
> Influxis, et. al. stop charging for bandwidth packages, and instead align
it
> with just user caps? I'd assume they'd at least lessen them
significantly.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stefan Richter" <stefan-fMeCE+ULXElEfu+5ix1nRw@public.gmane.org>
> To: <ramses-bs+ydo3BRmC6o3OwpzRdew@public.gmane.org>; "'FlashComm Mailing List'"
> <flashcomm-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 4:01 PM
> Subject: RE: [FlashComm] fms2 licensing: is this true?
>
>
> I haven't seen any userlimits being mentioned anywhere.
> My guess is as good as anyones but from the press release it sounds that
> licensing is per 2-CPU per Pro License.
>
> Sounds like an improvement to me if this is the case.
>
> Stefan
>
>
>
>
>
> =-----------------------------------------------------------
> Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
> =-----------------------------------------------------------
>
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>
>
> =-----------------------------------------------------------
> Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
> =-----------------------------------------------------------
>
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
>
=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
|
|
|
|
|