|
Home > Archive > Perlbal > February 2007 > perlbal and foundry
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
perlbal and foundry
|
|
| Andy Tornquist 2007-02-02, 7:11 am |
| Hi
We are running several perlbal machines that are load balanced behind a
foundry server iron. Has anyone experienced any compatability issues
between the two. Our website seems to become in accessible for several
minites at a time.
Andyt
| |
| Brad Fitzpatrick 2007-02-02, 7:11 pm |
| We run Perlbal behind BIG-IPs, not that that answers your question.
But when we have interaction questions/mysteries, it helps to run tcpdump
and capture traffic on the Perlbals themselves, to see what they're
doing... when they're getting connections vs when they're making requests
out, etc.
If you can capture anything weird looking and provide your configs, people
here might be able to help more?
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Andy Tornquist wrote:
> Hi
> We are running several perlbal machines that are load balanced behind a
> foundry server iron. Has anyone experienced any compatability issues
> between the two. Our website seems to become in accessible for several
> minites at a time.
>
> Andyt
>
>
| |
| Jay Buffington 2007-02-02, 7:11 pm |
| Requests for static data on our site goes:
ServerIron -> Squid -> PerlBal -> mod_perl (to get X-Reproxy-...) and
then back to client.
The ServerIron has a virtual called static that resolves to a farm of
two squid servers. We've had no problems with this set up. We
currently have SI-XLs and we are replacing them with SI-350s in an
active-active configuration.
Jay
[vbcol=seagreen]
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Andy Tornquist wrote:
|
|
|
|
|