Perlbal - Re: Standard for X-Reproxy-Service?

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Perlbal > May 2007 > Re: Standard for X-Reproxy-Service?





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Standard for X-Reproxy-Service?
Brad Fitzpatrick

2007-05-03, 1:11 am

David,

Perlbal already advertises its capabilities to downstream web servers.

- Brad


On Wed, 2 May 2007, David Weekly wrote:

> Brad,
>
> Helpful! It seems this header doesn't make a lot of sense for other
> reproxies, then.
>
> It seems to me that it could be helpful for a reverse proxy to be able
> to announce its capabilities to a downstream application server. That
> way an off-the-shelf install of a web service could take advantage of
> services like reproxying if available.
>
> (Or is that silly, since reproxy availability oughtn't be a "per
> connection" issue and therefore more properly belongs as an
> application server config setting?)
>
> Just a thought. Thanks again for the clarification.
>
> -David
>
>
> On 5/2/07, Brad Fitzpatrick <brad@danga.com> wrote:
>
>


Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com