|
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > October 2005 > Long Distance Calling Problem
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Long Distance Calling Problem
|
|
| Joe Toth 2005-10-24, 9:12 am |
| Greetings,
I have a 1760 FXO Gateway that I am trying to make long distance or 800
number calls throught connected to a POTS line. I have set up a route
pattern for this purpose setup as 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX
However when I try to make an out going call on this gateway I get a
fast busy signal on the phone and about a second after I get the fast
busy there is an incoming call to the first DN on the phone which is
setup as the Attendant DN for the Gateway. If I pickup this incoming
call there is nothing on it, no audio or caller ID information.
I can make outgoing local calls on this without incident as well as take
incoming calls from local and long distance. I have plugged a regular
telephone into the line to insure that I can make long distance calls on
the line period and I can.
I was hoping that someone has run into this before or might have an idea
of how to troubleshoot it. I used the DNA tool and determined that CCM
is picking up the correct route pattern as well as gateway for these
calls. I can also see the activity light on the FXO port on the 1760
light up as well when I attempt to make a call.
Thanks in advance
Joe.
| |
| Erick Bergquist 2005-10-24, 9:12 am |
| MGCP? H323? What version of IOS?
What does 'show call hist voice' show for the problem
call? There is a bug in 12.4(3) where it doesn't send
digits out port right and local calls worked but
longer numbers did not.
Can you post the config (sanitized)?
To really see whats going on, capture following to a
text file.
debug voip ccapi inout
debug vtsp all
--- Joe Toth <JToth@cmefcu.org> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have a 1760 FXO Gateway that I am trying to make
> long distance or 800
> number calls throught connected to a POTS line. I
> have set up a route
> pattern for this purpose setup as
> 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX
>
> However when I try to make an out going call on this
> gateway I get a
> fast busy signal on the phone and about a second
> after I get the fast
> busy there is an incoming call to the first DN on
> the phone which is
> setup as the Attendant DN for the Gateway. If I
> pickup this incoming
> call there is nothing on it, no audio or caller ID
> information.
>
> I can make outgoing local calls on this without
> incident as well as take
> incoming calls from local and long distance. I have
> plugged a regular
> telephone into the line to insure that I can make
> long distance calls on
> the line period and I can.
>
> I was hoping that someone has run into this before
> or might have an idea
> of how to troubleshoot it. I used the DNA tool and
> determined that CCM
> is picking up the correct route pattern as well as
> gateway for these
> calls. I can also see the activity light on the FXO
> port on the 1760
> light up as well when I attempt to make a call.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Joe.
__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
| |
| Joe Toth 2005-10-24, 9:12 am |
| Erick,
I did some more testing on this problem by putting another Analog phone
on the POTS line so I could hear what was happening on the line when the
FXO port dials. The Gateway actually makes the call to the other end
successfully. I can hear the GW dial and the other end pickup it seems
as though the GW is just not connecting the call to the IP Phone.
Do you have a bug ID for the issue you mentioned in the 12.4(3) as this
is the version of IOS that is running the Gateway?
Thanks,
Joe Toth
Systems Engineer
CME Federal Credit Union
E: jtoth@cmefcu.org
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 12:12 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 32, Issue 67
Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
cisco-voip-owner@puck.nether.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Unity Voice Mail Archiving Messages (Carter, Bill)
2. Long Distance Calling Problem (Joe Toth)
3. Re: Long Distance Calling Problem (Erick Bergquist)
4. Re: Unity Voice Mail Archiving Messages (Wes Sisk)
5. RE: CER upgrade from 1.2(2) to 1.2(3) - OS Error (Carter, Bill)
6. ??: How to remove CCM4.1(3) (vincent)
7. ??: How to remove CCM4.1(3) (vincent)
8. RE: IPCC Express 4.0 verification (Voll, Scott)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:37:28 -0500
From: "Carter, Bill" <bcarter@sentinel.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity Voice Mail Archiving Messages
To: <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
< 6A0744639B86DD459433108DBF101D26A42F9F@M
AIL01.sentinel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I am responding to an RFP and I don't know how to answer this question
about Unity Voice Mail
"Archive Messages: Describe the options for archiving stored messages
and the process to accomplish this function. Clearly define the tasks
of both station users and system administrators in the archiving
function."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c...20051016/06bd70
0f/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 16:12:49 -0400
From: "Joe Toth" <JToth@cmefcu.org>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Long Distance Calling Problem
To: <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: < 8B44972B5C67134BB8C8B61A54BA10F6CE00E1@c
umx1.cmefcu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Greetings,
I have a 1760 FXO Gateway that I am trying to make long distance or 800
number calls throught connected to a POTS line. I have set up a route
pattern for this purpose setup as 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX
However when I try to make an out going call on this gateway I get a
fast busy signal on the phone and about a second after I get the fast
busy there is an incoming call to the first DN on the phone which is
setup as the Attendant DN for the Gateway. If I pickup this incoming
call there is nothing on it, no audio or caller ID information.
I can make outgoing local calls on this without incident as well as take
incoming calls from local and long distance. I have plugged a regular
telephone into the line to insure that I can make long distance calls on
the line period and I can.
I was hoping that someone has run into this before or might have an idea
of how to troubleshoot it. I used the DNA tool and determined that CCM
is picking up the correct route pattern as well as gateway for these
calls. I can also see the activity light on the FXO port on the 1760
light up as well when I attempt to make a call.
Thanks in advance
Joe.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c...20051016/2b4404
7b/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Erick Bergquist <erickbe@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Long Distance Calling Problem
To: Joe Toth <JToth@cmefcu.org>, cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <20051016214003.19801.qmail@web34302.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
MGCP? H323? What version of IOS?
What does 'show call hist voice' show for the problem
call? There is a bug in 12.4(3) where it doesn't send
digits out port right and local calls worked but
longer numbers did not.
Can you post the config (sanitized)?
To really see whats going on, capture following to a
text file.
debug voip ccapi inout
debug vtsp all
--- Joe Toth <JToth@cmefcu.org> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have a 1760 FXO Gateway that I am trying to make
> long distance or 800
> number calls throught connected to a POTS line. I
> have set up a route
> pattern for this purpose setup as
> 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX
>
> However when I try to make an out going call on this
> gateway I get a
> fast busy signal on the phone and about a second
> after I get the fast
> busy there is an incoming call to the first DN on
> the phone which is
> setup as the Attendant DN for the Gateway. If I
> pickup this incoming
> call there is nothing on it, no audio or caller ID
> information.
>
> I can make outgoing local calls on this without
> incident as well as take
> incoming calls from local and long distance. I have
> plugged a regular
> telephone into the line to insure that I can make
> long distance calls on
> the line period and I can.
>
> I was hoping that someone has run into this before
> or might have an idea
> of how to troubleshoot it. I used the DNA tool and
> determined that CCM
> is picking up the correct route pattern as well as
> gateway for these
> calls. I can also see the activity light on the FXO
> port on the 1760
> light up as well when I attempt to make a call.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Joe.
__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 20:23:48 -0400
From: Wes Sisk <wsisk@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Voice Mail Archiving Messages
To: "Carter, Bill" <bcarter@sentinel.com>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <4352EF14.1010000@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c...20051016/bd4c24
06/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 21:22:26 -0500
From: "Carter, Bill" <bcarter@sentinel.com>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CER upgrade from 1.2(2) to 1.2(3) - OS Error
To: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk@cisco.com>, <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
< 6A0744639B86DD459433108DBF101D2608989A@M
AIL01.sentinel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I actually downloaded 1.2(3) a couple of months ago and just now tried
to install it. I downloaded and installed 1.2(3a) with no problem.
Thanks
________________________________
From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk@cisco.com]
Sent: Fri 10/14/2005 9:58 AM
To: Carter, Bill; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CER upgrade from 1.2(2) to 1.2(3) - OS Error
This was a problem with 1.2(3) which was posted, removed, and replaced
with 1.2(3a). how did you get this version of CER? can you dnld from
cisco.com again?
/Wes
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Carter, Bill
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 10:48 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CER upgrade from 1.2(2) to 1.2(3) - OS Error
I am trying to upgrade an Emergency responder from 1.2(2) to 1.2(3a).
Release notes say minimum OS version 2000.2.6sr2 or later is required.
I installed 2000.2.7 and 2000.2.7sr7. CER upgrade fails on OS check
saying it did not detect 2000.2.6sr2 or later.?.
How do I install the CER upgrade ??? do I need to install 2000.2.6 and
2000.2.6sr2 on top of the 2000.2.7??
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:38:46 +0800
From: "vincent" <vincent@net-2com.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] ??: How to remove CCM4.1(3)
To: "'vincent'" <dxyzsh@hotmail.com>, "'vincent'"
<vincent@net-2com.com>, <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <200510170338.j9H3c7Pd087388@puck.nether.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
-----????-----
???: vincent [mailto:dxyzsh@hotmail.com]
????: 2005?10?17? 10:58
???: 'vincent'; 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net'
??: How to remove CCM4.1(3)
Hi all:
Now I?have installed CCM4.1(3),but I want to down grade to
CCM4.1(2),so
need I remove the CCM4.1(3) first? And pls who can advise me how to
remove
it? Thank you very much!
-----????-----
???: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] ??
cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net
????: 2005?10?17? 0:01
???: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
??: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 32, Issue 66
Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
cisco-voip-owner@puck.nether.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. IPCC Express 4.0 verification (Steve G)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:30:19 -0700
From: Steve G <smgustafson@gmail.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] IPCC Express 4.0 verification
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Message-ID:
< 8a1f34b50510150930n42f7ad00ya06fe854ac57
934b@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hello,
I have read that the maximum number of agents supported on IPCC
Express 4.0is 300 and supervisors is 32. If I have 350 agents but only
150 logged in
simultaneously, will I be ok? Does "maximum number of agents" mean
active
agents or configured.
Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c...20051015/d94d63
9e/a
ttachment-0001.html
------------------------------
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 32, Issue 66
****************************************
**
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:47:51 +0800
From: "vincent" <vincent@net-2com.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] ??: How to remove CCM4.1(3)
To: <jvega1@lucent.com>, <rferrer@lucent.com>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <200510170347.j9H3l9Vx088257@puck.nether.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Hi all:
Now I?have installed CCM4.1(3),but I want to down grade to
CCM4.1(2),so
need I remove the CCM4.1(3) first? And pls who can advise me how to
remove
it? Thank you very much!
-----????-----
???: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] ??
cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net
????: 2005?10?17? 0:01
???: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
??: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 32, Issue 66
Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
cisco-voip-owner@puck.nether.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. IPCC Express 4.0 verification (Steve G)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:30:19 -0700
From: Steve G <smgustafson@gmail.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] IPCC Express 4.0 verification
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Message-ID:
< 8a1f34b50510150930n42f7ad00ya06fe854ac57
934b@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hello,
I have read that the maximum number of agents supported on IPCC
Express 4.0is 300 and supervisors is 32. If I have 350 agents but only
150 logged in
simultaneously, will I be ok? Does "maximum number of agents" mean
active
agents or configured.
Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c...20051015/d94d63
9e/a
ttachment-0001.html
------------------------------
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 32, Issue 66
****************************************
**
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 21:10:10 -0700
From: "Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll@wesd.org>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] IPCC Express 4.0 verification
To: "Steve G" <smgustafson@gmail.com>, <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: < D713462ED535184D830F6F6301753E7E018B315D
@VISHNU.wesd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
My understanding of IPCC, (if I'm wrong I will be corrected) is
licensing is all on a ConCurrent license structure. Things change a
little as far as licensing with sups vs agents as it now all the same
licensing, but believe that it still goes on a concurrent license.
Scott
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net on behalf of Steve G
Sent: Sat 10/15/2005 9:30 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] IPCC Express 4.0 verification
Hello,
I have read that the maximum number of agents supported on IPCC
Express 4.0 is 300 and supervisors is 32. If I have 350 agents but only
150 logged in simultaneously, will I be ok? Does "maximum number of
agents" mean active agents or configured.
Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c...20051017/aeb01f
3b/attachment.html
------------------------------
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 32, Issue 67
****************************************
**
| |
| Erick Bergquist 2005-10-24, 9:12 am |
| The bug id is CSCsb77872.
Downgrading to 12.4(1a) should fix the issue if it is
what you're hitting.
--- Joe Toth <JToth@cmefcu.org> wrote:
> Erick,
>
> I did some more testing on this problem by putting
> another Analog phone
> on the POTS line so I could hear what was happening
> on the line when the
> FXO port dials. The Gateway actually makes the call
> to the other end
> successfully. I can hear the GW dial and the other
> end pickup it seems
> as though the GW is just not connecting the call to
> the IP Phone.
>
> Do you have a bug ID for the issue you mentioned in
> the 12.4(3) as this
> is the version of IOS that is running the Gateway?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe Toth
> Systems Engineer
> CME Federal Credit Union
>
> E: jtoth@cmefcu.org
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On
> Behalf Of
> cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net
> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 12:12 AM
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 32, Issue 67
>
> Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cisco-voip-owner@puck.nether.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Unity Voice Mail Archiving Messages (Carter,
> Bill)
> 2. Long Distance Calling Problem (Joe Toth)
> 3. Re: Long Distance Calling Problem (Erick
> Bergquist)
> 4. Re: Unity Voice Mail Archiving Messages (Wes
> Sisk)
> 5. RE: CER upgrade from 1.2(2) to 1.2(3) - OS
> Error (Carter, Bill)
> 6. ??: How to remove CCM4.1(3) (vincent)
> 7. ??: How to remove CCM4.1(3) (vincent)
> 8. RE: IPCC Express 4.0 verification (Voll,
> Scott)
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:37:28 -0500
> From: "Carter, Bill" <bcarter@sentinel.com>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity Voice Mail Archiving
> Messages
> To: <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID:
>
>
< 6A0744639B86DD459433108DBF101D26A42F9F@M
AIL01.sentinel.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I am responding to an RFP and I don't know how to
> answer this question
> about Unity Voice Mail
>
> "Archive Messages: Describe the options for
> archiving stored messages
> and the process to accomplish this function.
> Clearly define the tasks
> of both station users and system administrators in
> the archiving
> function."
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c...20051016/06bd70
> 0f/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 16:12:49 -0400
> From: "Joe Toth" <JToth@cmefcu.org>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Long Distance Calling Problem
> To: <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID:
>
< 8B44972B5C67134BB8C8B61A54BA10F6CE00E1@c
umx1.cmefcu.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Greetings,
>
> I have a 1760 FXO Gateway that I am trying to make
> long distance or 800
> number calls throught connected to a POTS line. I
> have set up a route
> pattern for this purpose setup as
> 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX
>
> However when I try to make an out going call on this
> gateway I get a
> fast busy signal on the phone and about a second
> after I get the fast
> busy there is an incoming call to the first DN on
> the phone which is
> setup as the Attendant DN for the Gateway. If I
> pickup this incoming
> call there is nothing on it, no audio or caller ID
> information.
>
> I can make outgoing local calls on this without
> incident as well as take
> incoming calls from local and long distance. I have
> plugged a regular
> telephone into the line to insure that I can make
> long distance calls on
> the line period and I can.
>
> I was hoping that someone has run into this before
> or might have an idea
> of how to troubleshoot it. I used the DNA tool and
> determined that CCM
> is picking up the correct route pattern as well as
> gateway for these
> calls. I can also see the activity light on the FXO
> port on the 1760
> light up as well when I attempt to make a call.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Joe.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c...20051016/2b4404
> 7b/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Erick Bergquist <erickbe@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Long Distance Calling
> Problem
> To: Joe Toth <JToth@cmefcu.org>,
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Message-ID:
>
<20051016214003.19801.qmail@web34302.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> MGCP? H323? What version of IOS?
>
> What does 'show call hist voice' show for the
> problem
> call? There is a bug in 12.4(3) where it doesn't
> send
> digits out port right and local calls worked but
> longer numbers did not.
>
> Can you post the config (sanitized)?
>
> To really see whats going on, capture following to a
> text file.
>
> debug voip ccapi inout
> debug vtsp all
>
> --- Joe Toth <JToth@cmefcu.org> wrote:
>
> this
> have
> FXO
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
>
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 20:23:48 -0400
> From: Wes Sisk <wsisk@cisco.com>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Voice Mail Archiving
> Messages
> To: "Carter, Bill" <bcarter@sentinel.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Message-ID: <4352EF14.1010000@cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c...20051016/bd4c24
> 06/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 21:22:26 -0500
> From: "Carter, Bill" <bcarter@sentinel.com>
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CER upgrade from 1.2(2) to
> 1.2(3) - OS Error
> To: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk@cisco.com>,
> <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID:
>
>
< 6A0744639B86DD459433108DBF101D2608989A@M
AIL01.sentinel.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I actually downloaded 1.2(3) a couple of months ago
> and just now tried
> to install it. I downloaded and installed 1.2(3a)
> with no problem.
>
> Thanks
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk@cisco.com]
> Sent: Fri 10/14/2005 9:58 AM
> To: Carter, Bill; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CER upgrade from 1.2(2) to
> 1.2(3) - OS Error
>
>
> This was a problem with 1.2(3) which was posted,
> removed, and replaced
> with 1.2(3a). how did you get this version of CER?
> can you dnld from
> cisco.com again?
>
> /Wes
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf
> Of Carter, Bill
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 10:48 AM
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] CER upgrade from 1.2(2) to
> 1.2(3) - OS Error
>
>
> I am trying to upgrade an Emergency responder from
> 1.2(2) to 1.2(3a).
> Release notes say minimum OS version 2000.2.6sr2 or
> later is required.
> I installed 2000.2.7 and 2000.2.7sr7. CER upgrade
> fails on OS check
> saying it did not detect 2000.2.6sr2 or later.?.
>
> How do I install the CER upgrade ??? do I need to
> install 2000.2.6 and
> 2000.2.6sr2 on top of the 2000.2.7??
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:38:46 +0800
> From: "vincent" <vincent@net-2com.com>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] ??: How to remove CCM4.1(3)
> To: "'vincent'" <dxyzsh@hotmail.com>, "'vincent'"
> <vincent@net-2com.com>,
> <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID:
> <200510170338.j9H3c7Pd087388@puck.nether.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
>
>
>
> -----????-----
> ???: vincent [mailto:dxyzsh@hotmail.com]
> ????: 2005?10?17? 10:58
> ???: 'vincent'; 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net'
> ??: How to remove CCM4.1(3)
>
>
> Hi all:
> Now I?have installed CCM4.1(3),but I want to down
> grade to
> CCM4.1(2),so
> need I remove the CCM4.1(3) first? And pls who can
> advise me how to
> remove
> it? Thank you very much!
>
> -----????-----
> ???: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] ??
> cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net
> ????: 2005?10?17? 0:01
> ???: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> ??: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 32, Issue 66
>
> Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cisco-voip-owner@puck.nether.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. IPCC Express 4.0 verification (Steve G)
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:30:19 -0700
> From: Steve G <smgustafson@gmail.com>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] IPCC Express 4.0 verification
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Message-ID:
>
>
< 8a1f34b50510150930n42f7ad00ya06fe854ac57
934b@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hello,
> I have read that the maximum number of agents
> supported on IPCC
> Express 4.0is 300 and supervisors is 32. If I have
> 350 agents but only
> 150 logged in
> simultaneously, will I be ok? Does "maximum number
> of agents" mean
> active
> agents or configured.
> Steve
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c...20051015/d94d63
> 9e/a
> ttachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 32, Issue 66
> ****************************************
**
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:47:51 +0800
> From: "vincent" <vincent@net-2com.com>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] ??: How to remove CCM4.1(3)
> To: <jvega1@lucent.com>, <rferrer@lucent.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Message-ID:
> <200510170347.j9H3l9Vx088257@puck.nether.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
>
> Hi all:
> Now I?have installed CCM4.1(3),but I want to down
> grade to
> CCM4.1(2),so
> need I remove the CCM4.1(3) first? And pls who can
> advise me how to
> remove
> it? Thank you very much!
>
> -----????-----
> ???: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] ??
> cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net
> ????: 2005?10?17? 0:01
> ???: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> ??: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 32, Issue 66
>
> Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cisco-voip-owner@puck.nether.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. IPCC Express 4.0 verification (Steve G)
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:30:19 -0700
> From: Steve G <smgustafson@gmail.com>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] IPCC Express 4.0 verification
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Message-ID:
>
>
< 8a1f34b50510150930n42f7ad00ya06fe854ac57
934b@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hello,
> I have read that the maximum number of agents
> supported on IPCC
> Express 4.0is 300 and supervisors is 32. If I have
> 350 agents but only
> 150 logged in
> simultaneously, will I be ok? Does "maximum number
> of agents" mean
> active
> agents or configured.
> Steve
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c...20051015/d94d63
> 9e/a
> ttachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 32, Issue 66
> ****************************************
**
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 21:10:10 -0700
> From: "Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll@wesd.org>
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] IPCC Express 4.0
> verification
> To: "Steve G" <smgustafson@gmail.com>,
> <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID:
>
< D713462ED535184D830F6F6301753E7E018B315D
@VISHNU.wesd.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> My understanding of IPCC, (if I'm wrong I will be
> corrected) is
> licensing is all on a ConCurrent license structure.
> Things change a
> little as far as licensing with sups vs agents as it
> now all the same
> licensing, but believe that it still goes on a
> concurrent license.
>
> Scott
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net on behalf
> of Steve G
> Sent: Sat 10/15/2005 9:30 AM
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] IPCC Express 4.0 verification
>
>
> Hello,
> I have read that the maximum number of agents
> supported on IPCC
> Express 4.0 is 300 and supervisors is 32. If I have
> 350 agents but only
> 150 logged in simultaneously, will I be ok? Does
> "maximum number of
> agents" mean active agents or configured.
>
> Steve
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c...20051017/aeb01f
> 3b/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 32, Issue 67
> ****************************************
**
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Music Unlimited
Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/
|
|
|
|
|