|
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > November 2005 > VT Advantage
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| Tim Ritter 2005-11-18, 5:45 pm |
| Is there a way to have a conference call and have multiple VT advantage
cameras come up?
or is VT advantage only point to point video?
Thanks
Tim
| |
|
| What is the minimum IPVC necessary to do a 3 or more VT advantage
stream?
-----Original Message-----
From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 1:18 PM
To: IT; Ryan Ratliff; Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage
I do point to point with no problem with CM 4.1. It's just if you want
3 or more streams that you need a IPVC.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of IT
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:46 AM
To: Ryan Ratliff; Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage
You cant even do point-to-point 2 member vt advantage calls?
What is the minimum IPVC necessary to get VT advantages working?
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:55 AM
To: Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage
Without an IPVC conference bridge you can't do any video
conferencing, just like without a CFB you can't do any voice
conferencing.
-Ryan
On Nov 18, 2005, at 1:46 PM, Tim Ritter wrote:
Is there a way to have a conference call and have multiple VT
advantage cameras come up?
or is VT advantage only point to point video?
Thanks
Tim
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
****************************************
**************
This email may contain trade secrets and/or other information that is
proprietary and/or confidential. Use of this by anyone other than the
intended recipient(s) is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not
the intended recipient, delete the e-mail and notify us immediately.
****************************************
**************
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
| |
| Voll, Scott 2005-11-18, 8:45 pm |
| Take your pick. I think your looking at a minimum of a 3511. But it
depends on what you want it to do. I have an old 3510 that I don't
believe will would with CM.
I would also be interested in if Tanberg has anything.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: IT [mailto:it@cimgroup.com]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 3:51 PM
To: Voll, Scott; IT; Ryan Ratliff; Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage
What is the minimum IPVC necessary to do a 3 or more VT advantage
stream?
-----Original Message-----
From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 1:18 PM
To: IT; Ryan Ratliff; Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage
I do point to point with no problem with CM 4.1. It's just if you want
3 or more streams that you need a IPVC.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of IT
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:46 AM
To: Ryan Ratliff; Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage
You cant even do point-to-point 2 member vt advantage calls?
What is the minimum IPVC necessary to get VT advantages working?
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:55 AM
To: Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage
Without an IPVC conference bridge you can't do any video
conferencing, just like without a CFB you can't do any voice
conferencing.
-Ryan
On Nov 18, 2005, at 1:46 PM, Tim Ritter wrote:
Is there a way to have a conference call and have multiple VT
advantage cameras come up?
or is VT advantage only point to point video?
Thanks
Tim
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
****************************************
**************
This email may contain trade secrets and/or other information that is
proprietary and/or confidential. Use of this by anyone other than the
intended recipient(s) is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not
the intended recipient, delete the e-mail and notify us immediately.
****************************************
**************
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
| |
| Ryan Ratliff 2005-11-20, 5:45 pm |
| You need to have an EMP in your 3511 to do continuous presence with
VTA. The MP will support continuous presence but only with H.261 and
the VTA only uses H.263.
-Ryan
On Nov 18, 2005, at 7:21 PM, Voll, Scott wrote:
Take your pick. I think your looking at a minimum of a 3511. But it
depends on what you want it to do. I have an old 3510 that I don't
believe will would with CM.
I would also be interested in if Tanberg has anything.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: IT [mailto:it@cimgroup.com]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 3:51 PM
To: Voll, Scott; IT; Ryan Ratliff; Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage
What is the minimum IPVC necessary to do a 3 or more VT advantage
stream?
-----Original Message-----
From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 1:18 PM
To: IT; Ryan Ratliff; Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage
I do point to point with no problem with CM 4.1. It's just if you want
3 or more streams that you need a IPVC.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of IT
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:46 AM
To: Ryan Ratliff; Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage
You cant even do point-to-point 2 member vt advantage calls?
What is the minimum IPVC necessary to get VT advantages working?
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:55 AM
To: Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage
Without an IPVC conference bridge you can't do any video
conferencing, just like without a CFB you can't do any voice
conferencing.
-Ryan
On Nov 18, 2005, at 1:46 PM, Tim Ritter wrote:
Is there a way to have a conference call and have multiple VT
advantage cameras come up?
or is VT advantage only point to point video?
Thanks
Tim
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
****************************************
**************
This email may contain trade secrets and/or other information that is
proprietary and/or confidential. Use of this by anyone other than the
intended recipient(s) is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not
the intended recipient, delete the e-mail and notify us immediately.
****************************************
**************
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
|
|
|
|
|