|
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > December 2005 > Upgrade to 4.1(3) SR2?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Upgrade to 4.1(3) SR2?
|
|
| Ruttman, Peter G. 2005-12-28, 5:46 pm |
| We have a few issues that are addressed in SR2. Has anyone on the
listed loaded SR2 in a production environment yet? Does anyone have any
reason to tell us to wait?
Pete
The preceding email message may be confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this message in error, please (i) do not read it, (ii) reply to the sender that you received the message in error, and (iii) erase or destroy the message. Legal advice contained in the preceding message is solely for the benefit of the Foley & Lardner LLP client(s) represented by the Firm in the particular matter that is the subject of this message, and may not be relied upon by anyother party.
Internal Revenue Service regulations require that certain types of written advice include a disclaimer. To the extent the preceding message contains advice relating to a Federal tax issue, unless expressly stated otherwise the advice is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by the recipient or any other taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding Federal tax penalties, and was not written to support the promotion or marketing of any transaction or matter discussed herein.
| |
| Sullivan, Gary, GREENWICH, 2005-12-29, 7:45 am |
| We upgraded to this 2 weeks ago. the only issue I have is a PRI to a Nortel M1 PBX.
The PRI is up D-channel is established but can't make or receive calls.
I have a cisco TAC case opened on it now.
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Ruttman, Peter G.
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 12:12 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Upgrade to 4.1(3) SR2?
We have a few issues that are addressed in SR2. Has anyone on the listed loaded SR2 in a production environment yet? Does anyone have any reason to tell us to wait?
Pete
The preceding email message may be confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this message in error, please (i) do not read it, (ii) reply to the sender that you received the message in error, and (iii) erase or destroy the message. Legal advice contained in the preceding message is solely for the benefit of the Foley & Lardner LLP client(s) represented by the Firm in the particular matter that is the subject of this message, and may not be relied upon by any other party.
Internal Revenue Service regulations require that certain types of written advice include a disclaimer. To the extent the preceding message contains advice relating to a Federal tax issue, unless expressly stated otherwise the advice is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by the recipient or any other taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding Federal tax penalties, and was not written to support the promotion or marketing of any transaction or matter discussed herein.
| |
| Mike Armstrong 2005-12-29, 5:46 pm |
| We upgraded 2 weeks ago; no problems seen, but we're a small, basic
environment (Pub/Sub, PRI to Verizon, no WAN, 250 stations, Unity/Exchange).
Mike Armstrong
UF/IFAS CREC
Lake Alfred, FL
> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:11:34 -0600
> From: "Ruttman, Peter G." <PRuttman@foley.com>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Upgrade to 4.1(3) SR2?
> To: <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID:
> < 7E3064B7EFC16C41B185C41D141008B7CC35B7@f
oleyex97.foleylaw.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> We have a few issues that are addressed in SR2. Has anyone on the
> listed loaded SR2 in a production environment yet? Does anyone have any
> reason to tell us to wait?
>
> Pete
>
|
|
|
|
|