|
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > July 2005 > VAD
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| Nick Kassel 2005-07-21, 7:45 am |
| We currently have no vad configured on all of our dial peers as listed
below except for the dial-peer voice 9 pots, should I also add the
no vad command to this dial peer as well or does it not need it?
dial-peer voice 1 voip
preference 1
destination-pattern 2977..
progress_ind setupenable 1
translate-outgoing calling 1
session target ipv4:
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
codec g711ulaw
no vad
!
dial-peer voice 100 voip
incoming called-number .
codec g711ulaw
no vad
!
dial-peer voice 9 pots
destination-pattern 9T
progress_ind alert enable 8
direct-inward-dial
port 1/0:15
!
dial-peer voice 2 voip
preference 2
destination-pattern 2977..
progress_ind setup enable 3
translate-outgoing calling 1
session target ipv4:
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
codec g711ulaw
no vad
****************************************
****************************************
***************
The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all
of which may be legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient only.
Access to this e-mail by any other person is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of,
replying to or any action taken or omitted to betaken in reliance on this
e-mail, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender immediately
should this e-mail have been incorrectly addressed or transmitted.
You accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the
recipient(s) accesses them and that delivery receipt does not constitute
acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s). You accept that there
may be adelay in processing the instructions received from e-mails after
Charles Stanley has received them. You are advised that urgent, time sensitive
and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail.
You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of
malfunction, viruses, unauthorised interference, mis-delivery or delay.
****************************************
****************************************
****************
Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR
Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304
Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Tozer Wingate are divisions of Charles Stanley& Co. Ltd
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the
London Stock Exchange, International SecuritiesMarkets Association, and The London International Financial Futures &
Options Exchange.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee
VirusScan and SurfControl Email Filter software.
| |
| Dave Temkin 2005-07-21, 7:45 am |
| It wouldn't be supported on the POTS dial peer as VAD is an IP feature.
See:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk6...82.shtml#topic1
--
David Temkin
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Nick Kassel wrote:
> We currently have no vad configured on all of our dial peers as listed
> below except for the dial-peer voice 9 pots, should I also add the
>
> no vad command to this dial peer as well or does it not need it?
>
>
>
>
>
> dial-peer voice 1 voip
>
> preference 1
>
> destination-pattern 2977..
>
> progress_ind setup enable 1
>
> translate-outgoing calling 1
>
> session target ipv4:
>
> dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
>
> codec g711ulaw
>
> no vad
>
> !
>
> dial-peer voice 100 voip
>
> incoming called-number .
>
> codec g711ulaw
>
> no vad
>
> !
>
> dial-peer voice 9 pots
>
> destination-pattern 9T
>
> progress_ind alert enable 8
>
> direct-inward-dial
>
> port 1/0:15
>
> !
>
> dial-peer voice 2 voip
>
> preference 2
>
> destination-pattern 2977..
>
> progress_ind setup enable 3
>
> translate-outgoing calling 1
>
> session target ipv4:
>
> dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
>
> codec g711ulaw
>
> no vad
>
> ****************************************
****************************************
***************
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all
> of which may be legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient only.
> Access to this e-mail by any other person is prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of,
> replying to or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on this
> e-mail, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender immediately
> should this e-mail have been incorrectly addressed or transmitted.
>
> You accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the
> recipient(s) accesses them and that delivery receipt does not constitute
> acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s). You accept that there
> may be a delay in processing the instructions received from e-mails after
> Charles Stanley has received them. You are advised that urgent, time sensitive
> and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail.
>
> You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of
> malfunction, viruses, unauthorised interference, mis-delivery or delay.
> ****************************************
****************************************
****************
>
>
> Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
> Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR
>
> Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
> Registered in England No. 1903304
>
> Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Tozer Wingate are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
>
> Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the
> London Stock Exchange, International Securities Markets Association, and The London International Financial Futures &
> Options Exchange.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee
> VirusScan and SurfControl Email Filter software.
>
|
|
|
|
|