|
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > August 2005 > CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
|
|
| Vincent De Keyzer 2005-08-17, 7:46 am |
| Hello,
we are using CCM in a multi-tenant evironment, and I would like to start
using the attendant console for some of the tenants.
Unfortunately, I can't use the corporate directory to show the status of
lines, since this would show to one tenant all users of the system, and not
his users only (the corporate directory does not seem to understand the
concept of partitions).
I have seen in the "advanced settings'" of the attendant console a "local
directory file" parameter - does anybody have an idea whether this could be
used for the purpose of creating a local static file of users (which would
be, if not ideal, better than nothing)? If yes, what would be the syntax of
this file?
Thanks in advance,
| |
| Wes Sisk 2005-08-17, 7:46 am |
| yes, see the AC documentation for corporatedirectory.txt
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer.../products_admin
istration_guide_chapter09186a00803f3a8b.html#wp1162566
/Wes
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Vincent De Keyzer
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 4:36 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
Hello,
we are using CCM in a multi-tenant evironment, and I would like to start
using the attendant console for some of the tenants.
Unfortunately, I can't use the corporate directory to show the status of
lines, since this would show to one tenant all users of the system, and not
his users only (the corporate directory does not seem to understand the
concept of partitions).
I have seen in the "advanced settings'" of the attendant console a "local
directory file" parameter - does anybody have an idea whether this could be
used for the purpose of creating a local static file of users (which would
be, if not ideal, better than nothing)? If yes, what would be the syntax of
this file?
Thanks in advance,
| |
| Kevin Thorngren 2005-08-17, 5:45 pm |
| Hi Vincent,
This URL describes the syntax of the user defined file:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/
products_administration_guide_chapter091
86a00801ec5a5.html#1117660
HTH,
Kevin
On Aug 17, 2005, at 4:36 AM, Vincent De Keyzer wrote:
> Hello,
> _
> we are using CCM in a multi-tenant evironment, and I would like to
> start using the attendant console for some of the tenants.
> _
> Unfortunately, I can’t use the corporate directory to show the status
> of lines, since this would show to one tenant all users of the system,
> and not his users only (the corporate directory does not seem to
> understand the concept of partitions).
> _
> I have seen in the “advanced settings’” of the attendant console a
> “local directory file” parameter – does anybody have an idea whether
> this could be used for the purpose of creating a local static file of
> users (which would be, if not ideal, better than nothing)? If yes,
> what would be the syntax of this file?
> _
> Thanks in advance,
> _
> _
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
| |
| Vincent De Keyzer 2005-08-17, 5:45 pm |
| Cool ! Now users appear in the list, and I can even transfer calls to them.
But the “status” functionality does not work: it shows a blue question mark
instead of the promised icons. Any idea what I am missing?
Vincent
_____
From: Kevin Thorngren [mailto:kthorngr@cisco.com]
Sent: mercredi 17 août 2005 14:48
To: Vincent De Keyzer
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
Hi Vincent,
This URL describes the syntax of the user defined file:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products..._administration
_guide_chapter09186a00801ec5a5.html#1117660
HTH,
Kevin
On Aug 17, 2005, at 4:36 AM, Vincent De Keyzer wrote:
Hello,
we are using CCM in a multi-tenant evironment, and I would like to start
using the attendant console for some of the tenants.
Unfortunately, I can’t use the corporate directory to show the status of
lines, since this would show to one tenant all users of the system, and not
his users only (the corporate directory does not seem to understand the
concept of partitions).
I have seen in the “advanced settings’” of the attendant console a “local
directory file” parameter – does anybody have an idea whether this could be
used for the purpose of creating a local static file of users (which would
be, if not ideal, better than nothing)? If yes, what would be the syntax of
this file?
Thanks in advance,
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
| |
| Kevin Thorngren 2005-08-17, 5:45 pm |
| We have seen this type of behavior with XP SP2 and having the firewall
active. If this is your case try turning of the XP firewall.
Kevin
On Aug 17, 2005, at 9:12 AM, Vincent De Keyzer wrote:
> Cool_! Now users appear in the list, and I can even transfer calls to
> them.
> _
> But the “status” functionality does not work: it shows a blue question
> mark instead of the promised icons. Any idea what I am missing?
> _
> Vincent
> _
> _
> _
>
> From: Kevin Thorngren [mailto:kthorngr@cisco.com]
> Sent: mercredi 17 août 2005 14:48
> To: Vincent De Keyzer
> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
> _
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> This URL describes the syntax of the user defined file:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/
> products_administration_guide_chapter091
86a00801ec5a5.html#1117660
>
> HTH,
> Kevin
> On Aug 17, 2005, at 4:36 AM, Vincent De Keyzer wrote:
> Hello,
> _
> we are using CCM in a multi-tenant evironment, and I would like to
> start using the attendant console for some of the tenants.
> _
> Unfortunately, I can’t use the corporate directory to show the status
> of lines, since this would show to one tenant all users of the system,
> and not his users only (the corporate directory does not seem to
> understand the concept of partitions).
> _
> I have seen in the “advanced settings’” of the attendant console a
> “local directory file” parameter – does anybody have an idea whether
> this could be used for the purpose of creating a local static file of
> users (which would be, if not ideal, better than nothing)? If yes,
> what would be the syntax of this file?
> _
> Thanks in advance,
> _
> _
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
| |
| Voll, Scott 2005-08-17, 5:45 pm |
| Are you using just the extension? If you use the full number I've seen this happen.
scott
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Vincent De Keyzer
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 6:13 AM
To: 'Kevin Thorngren'
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
Cool ! Now users appear in the list, and I can even transfer calls to them.
But the "status" functionality does not work: it shows a blue question mark instead of the promised icons. Any idea what I am missing?
Vincent
________________________________
From: Kevin Thorngren [mailto:kthorngr@cisco.com]
Sent: mercredi 17 août 2005 14:48
To: Vincent De Keyzer
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
Hi Vincent,
This URL describes the syntax of the user defined file:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products...a5.html#1117660
HTH,
Kevin
On Aug 17, 2005, at 4:36 AM, Vincent De Keyzer wrote:
Hello,
we are using CCM in a multi-tenant evironment, and I would like to start using the attendant console for some of the tenants.
Unfortunately, I can't use the corporate directory to show the status of lines, since this would show to one tenant all users of the system, and not his users only (the corporate directory does not seem to understand the concept of partitions).
I have seen in the "advanced settings'" of the attendant console a "local directory file" parameter - does anybody have an idea whether this could be used for the purpose of creating a local static file of users (which would be, if not ideal, better than nothing)? If yes, what would be the syntax of this file?
Thanks in advance,
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
| |
| Brandon Peyton 2005-08-17, 5:45 pm |
| I have a similar issue - it seems to be only linked to the machine itself.
Other users can see the correct status.
I'm running SP2, but the firewall is turned off, and I still see a status of
?.
Any ideas?
Brandon
_____
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kevin Thorngren
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 9:20 AM
To: Vincent De Keyzer
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
We have seen this type of behavior with XP SP2 and having the firewall
active. If this is your case try turning of the XP firewall.
Kevin
On Aug 17, 2005, at 9:12 AM, Vincent De Keyzer wrote:
Cool ! Now users appear in the list, and I can even transfer calls to them.
But the “status” functionality does not work: it shows a blue question mark
instead of the promised icons. Any idea what I am missing?
Vincent
From: Kevin Thorngren [mailto:kthorngr@cisco.com]
Sent: mercredi 17 août 2005 14:48
To: Vincent De Keyzer
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
Hi Vincent,
This URL describes the syntax of the user defined file:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products..._administration
_guide_chapter09186a00801ec5a5.html#1117660
HTH,
Kevin
On Aug 17, 2005, at 4:36 AM, Vincent De Keyzer wrote:
Hello,
we are using CCM in a multi-tenant evironment, and I would like to start
using the attendant console for some of the tenants.
Unfortunately, I can’t use the corporate directory to show the status of
lines, since this would show to one tenant all users of the system, and not
his users only (the corporate directory does not seem to understand the
concept of partitions).
I have seen in the “advanced settings’” of the attendant console a “local
directory file” parameter – does anybody have an idea whether this could be
used for the purpose of creating a local static file of users (which would
be, if not ideal, better than nothing)? If yes, what would be the syntax of
this file?
Thanks in advance,
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
| |
| Vincent De Keyzer 2005-08-17, 5:45 pm |
| Well, there is a firewall between me and the server.
I will try outside of the firewall and see if it works better.
Thanks so far
Vincent
_____
From: Kevin Thorngren [mailto:kthorngr@cisco.com]
Sent: mercredi 17 août 2005 15:20
To: Vincent De Keyzer
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
We have seen this type of behavior with XP SP2 and having the firewall
active. If this is your case try turning of the XP firewall.
Kevin
On Aug 17, 2005, at 9:12 AM, Vincent De Keyzer wrote:
Cool ! Now users appear in the list, and I can even transfer calls to them.
But the “status” functionality does not work: it shows a blue question mark
instead of the promised icons. Any idea what I am missing?
Vincent
From: Kevin Thorngren [mailto:kthorngr@cisco.com]
Sent: mercredi 17 août 2005 14:48
To: Vincent De Keyzer
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
Hi Vincent,
This URL describes the syntax of the user defined file:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products..._administration
_guide_chapter09186a00801ec5a5.html#1117660
HTH,
Kevin
On Aug 17, 2005, at 4:36 AM, Vincent De Keyzer wrote:
Hello,
we are using CCM in a multi-tenant evironment, and I would like to start
using the attendant console for some of the tenants.
Unfortunately, I can’t use the corporate directory to show the status of
lines, since this would show to one tenant all users of the system, and not
his users only (the corporate directory does not seem to understand the
concept of partitions).
I have seen in the “advanced settings’” of the attendant console a “local
directory file” parameter – does anybody have an idea whether this could be
used for the purpose of creating a local static file of users (which would
be, if not ideal, better than nothing)? If yes, what would be the syntax of
this file?
Thanks in advance,
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
| |
| Wes Sisk 2005-08-17, 5:45 pm |
| how line status are propagated from ccm.exe to tcd clients:
1. ccm.exe sends line state update to local TCDsrv.exe process if CCM
service parameter "line state update enabled" is set to true.
this informs the tcd server side process of the line states. updates appear
in detailed TCD traces as:
DN: 4960048 Set: Idle
possible states are: Idle/Active/Ringing
2. after TCDSrv (AC Server) learns about the line state it has to decied
whether to send line state update down to ACClient. When you do a search in
the directory window, acclient sends a subscribe message to ACServer to
receive linestate updates for the lines in the directory search result set.
ACServer then sends linestate updates down to the client in UDP packets.
The client selects an ephemeral port to receive LSS updates by default but
can be configured to use a static port. on the clent, settings, advanced,
local host ip address (for line state)
ACClient subscrption shows up in ACServer traces as:
ServerClient subscribelinestate: inet address: 172.18.120.120 Port: 1818
if any LSS updates are available ACServer sends those down:
Sending 0 linestate(s) sent to client: 172.18.120.120
No state transitions on my lab server obviously.
/Wes
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Vincent De Keyzer
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 9:13 AM
To: 'Kevin Thorngren'
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
Cool ! Now users appear in the list, and I can even transfer calls to them.
But the =93status=94 functionality does not work: it shows a blue question =
mark
instead of the promised icons. Any idea what I am missing?
Vincent
From: Kevin Thorngren [mailto:kthorngr@cisco.com]
Sent: mercredi 17 ao=FBt 2005 14:48
To: Vincent De Keyzer
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
Hi Vincent,
This URL describes the syntax of the user defined file:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products..._administration
_guide_chapter09186a00801ec5a5.html#1117660
HTH,
Kevin
On Aug 17, 2005, at 4:36 AM, Vincent De Keyzer wrote:
Hello,
we are using CCM in a multi-tenant evironment, and I would like to start
using the attendant console for some of the tenants.
Unfortunately, I can=92t use the corporate directory to show the status of
lines, since this would show to one tenant all users of the system, and not
his users only (the corporate directory does not seem to understand the
concept of partitions).
I have seen in the =93advanced settings=92=94 of the attendant console a =
=93local
directory file=94 parameter =96 does anybody have an idea whether this coul=
d be
used for the purpose of creating a local static file of users (which would
be, if not ideal, better than nothing)? If yes, what would be the syntax of
this file?
Thanks in advance,
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
| |
| Vincent De Keyzer 2005-08-17, 5:45 pm |
| Thanks Wes,
> When you do a search in
> the directory window, acclient sends a subscribe message to ACServer to
> receive linestate updates for the lines in the directory search result
> set.
> ACServer then sends linestate updates down to the client in UDP packets.
>
> The client selects an ephemeral port to receive LSS updates by default but
> can be configured to use a static port. on the clent, settings, advanced,
> local host ip address (for line state)
>
> ACClient subscrption shows up in ACServer traces as:
> ServerClient subscribelinestate: inet address: 172.18.120.120 Port: 1818
>
> if any LSS updates are available ACServer sends those down:
> Sending 0 linestate(s) sent to client: 172.18.120.120
So I understand there is no way to get this working through a NATting
firewall: the attendant console has an inside address, which is NATted to a
outside address for the outgoing TCP session to the server; but UDP packets
are sent to the inside address - which does not make any sense outside of
the firewall.
I have tried to configure an outside address on the client, but it won't
accept it since the outside address does not appear on any of its NICs.
I'll place the machine outside of the firewall.
Thanks for the insight
Vincent
| |
| Wes Sisk 2005-08-17, 5:45 pm |
| configure a static xlation for 1 UDP port, force the client to always use
the same port number. This should work, no?
/Wes
-----Original Message-----
From: Vincent De Keyzer [mailto:vincent@dekeyzer.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 11:21 AM
To: 'Wes Sisk'; 'Kevin Thorngren'
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
Thanks Wes,
> When you do a search in
> the directory window, acclient sends a subscribe message to ACServer to
> receive linestate updates for the lines in the directory search result
> set.
> ACServer then sends linestate updates down to the client in UDP packets.
>
> The client selects an ephemeral port to receive LSS updates by default but
> can be configured to use a static port. on the clent, settings, advanced,
> local host ip address (for line state)
>
> ACClient subscrption shows up in ACServer traces as:
> ServerClient subscribelinestate: inet address: 172.18.120.120 Port: 1818
>
> if any LSS updates are available ACServer sends those down:
> Sending 0 linestate(s) sent to client: 172.18.120.120
So I understand there is no way to get this working through a NATting
firewall: the attendant console has an inside address, which is NATted to a
outside address for the outgoing TCP session to the server; but UDP packets
are sent to the inside address - which does not make any sense outside of
the firewall.
I have tried to configure an outside address on the client, but it won't
accept it since the outside address does not appear on any of its NICs.
I'll place the machine outside of the firewall.
Thanks for the insight
Vincent
| |
| Vincent De Keyzer 2005-08-17, 5:45 pm |
| The problem is not the port, the problem is the IP address.
I can only force an inside IP address on the client, and this inside IP
address does not make any sense on the server (because it's outside).
One solution is to assign an outside address to the client (although it's
inside). Ugly, but I might go for something like that if the customer really
wants the client to be "inside" the firewall.
Vincent
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk@cisco.com]
> Sent: mercredi 17 ao=FBt 2005 17:25
> To: Vincent De Keyzer; 'Kevin Thorngren'
> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
> =
> configure a static xlation for 1 UDP port, force the client to always use
> the same port number. This should work, no?
> =
> /Wes
> =
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vincent De Keyzer [mailto:vincent@dekeyzer.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 11:21 AM
> To: 'Wes Sisk'; 'Kevin Thorngren'
> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
> =
> =
> Thanks Wes,
> =
> but
> advanced,
> =
> So I understand there is no way to get this working through a NATting
> firewall: the attendant console has an inside address, which is NATted to
> a
> outside address for the outgoing TCP session to the server; but UDP
> packets
> are sent to the inside address - which does not make any sense outside of
> the firewall.
> =
> I have tried to configure an outside address on the client, but it won't
> accept it since the outside address does not appear on any of its NICs.
> =
> I'll place the machine outside of the firewall.
> =
> Thanks for the insight
> =
> Vincent
| |
| Wes Sisk 2005-08-17, 5:45 pm |
| gotcha. yeah, no nat fixup for RMI. /Wes
-----Original Message-----
From: Vincent De Keyzer [mailto:vincent@dekeyzer.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 11:30 AM
To: 'Wes Sisk'; 'Kevin Thorngren'
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
The problem is not the port, the problem is the IP address.
I can only force an inside IP address on the client, and this inside IP
address does not make any sense on the server (because it's outside).
One solution is to assign an outside address to the client (although it's
inside). Ugly, but I might go for something like that if the customer really
wants the client to be "inside" the firewall.
Vincent
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk@cisco.com]
> Sent: mercredi 17 ao=FBt 2005 17:25
> To: Vincent De Keyzer; 'Kevin Thorngren'
> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
>
> configure a static xlation for 1 UDP port, force the client to always use
> the same port number. This should work, no?
>
> /Wes
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vincent De Keyzer [mailto:vincent@dekeyzer.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 11:21 AM
> To: 'Wes Sisk'; 'Kevin Thorngren'
> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
>
>
> Thanks Wes,
>
> but
> advanced,
>
> So I understand there is no way to get this working through a NATting
> firewall: the attendant console has an inside address, which is NATted to
> a
> outside address for the outgoing TCP session to the server; but UDP
> packets
> are sent to the inside address - which does not make any sense outside of
> the firewall.
>
> I have tried to configure an outside address on the client, but it won't
> accept it since the outside address does not appear on any of its NICs.
>
> I'll place the machine outside of the firewall.
>
> Thanks for the insight
>
> Vincent
| |
| Frutin, Amy 2005-08-17, 5:45 pm |
| Does anyone know where the fields in the Attendant Console Advanced
Directory Search (e.g., Building, Site) query from?
And is there any way to raise the maximum amount of entries returned
when using a wildcard search? Looks like it's limited to 25...
TIA, Amy
------------------------------
From: Kevin Thorngren [mailto:kthorngr@cisco.com]
Sent: mercredi 17 ao?t 2005 14:48
To: Vincent De Keyzer
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
Hi Vincent,
This URL describes the syntax of the user defined file:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products...ucts_administra
tion
_guide_chapter09186a00801ec5a5.html#1117660
HTH,
Kevin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
This e-mail and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
protected by one or more legal privileges. It is intended solely
for the use of the addressee identified above. If you are not
the intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of this e-mail is UNAUTHORIZED. Neither this
information block, the typed name of the sender, nor anything
else in this message is intended to constitute an electronic
signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is
included in this message. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please immediately contact me and delete this e-mail from
your computer. Thank you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |
| Vincent De Keyzer 2005-08-18, 7:45 am |
| Well, something else about this (since all my questions got answered so far,
I'd better keep going :-)...
I have created a pilot point and put my extension in the associated hunt
group. When I call the hunt pilot, I first get the MOH for a few seconds
(which is fine) - but at that time I see nothing on the attendant console.
After that, my phone starts ringing, and only then I see the call in the
"call control" window of the AC.
If I place a second call while the first one is ringing, the same behaviour
happens: nothing while the MOH plays, then little bell when the call is
ringing.
Shouldn't I be seeing the queued calls on the attendant console *before*
they start ringing? =
Am I having the same firewall/NAT problem as for the line status?
Vincent
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk@cisco.com]
> Sent: mercredi 17 ao=FBt 2005 17:37
> To: Vincent De Keyzer; 'Kevin Thorngren'
> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
> =
> gotcha. yeah, no nat fixup for RMI. /Wes
> =
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vincent De Keyzer [mailto:vincent@dekeyzer.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 11:30 AM
> To: 'Wes Sisk'; 'Kevin Thorngren'
> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCM - Attendant console and multi-tenant
> =
> =
> The problem is not the port, the problem is the IP address.
> =
> I can only force an inside IP address on the client, and this inside IP
> address does not make any sense on the server (because it's outside).
> =
> One solution is to assign an outside address to the client (although it's
> inside). Ugly, but I might go for something like that if the customer
> really
> wants the client to be "inside" the firewall.
> =
> Vincent
> =
> =
[vbcol=seagreen]
> use
> to
> packets.
> 1818
> to
> of
|
|
|
|
|