Voice over IP Cisco - CORRECTION RE: Windows 2003 SP2

Author

CORRECTION RE: Windows 2003 SP2

Voll, Scott

2006-01-27, 8:48 pm

Thanks Martin. I meant Exchange 2003 sp 2.

Scott

________________________________

From: Martin Lohnert [mailto:lohnert@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 4:00 AM
To: Voll, Scott
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows 2003 SP2

HI Scott,

Where did you find out about W2003 SP2? I don't think there is such a
beast yet

Stu Packett

2006-01-27, 8:48 pm

Exchange 2003 SP2 is not yet supported. According to this Exchange blog
run by Exchange engineers, Unity maybe related to a blackberry and
GoodLink issue they are working on.

http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/a.../13/417440.aspx

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 7:44 AM
To: Martin Lohnert
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: CORRECTION RE: [cisco-voip] Windows 2003 SP2

Thanks Martin. I meant Exchange 2003 sp 2.

Scott

________________________________

From: Martin Lohnert [mailto:lohnert@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 4:00 AM
To: Voll, Scott
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows 2003 SP2

HI Scott,

Where did you find out about W2003 SP2? I don't think there is such a
beast yet

Or do you mean Windows 2003 R2 ?

Cheers,

ML

On 1/23/06, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll@wesd.org> wrote:

Is Windows 2003 SP2 approved for UM Unity 4.0.5?

Scott

________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
--------------------------------------------------------

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice in this communication (including attachments) is not intended or written by Fenwick & West LLP to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
--------------------------------------------------------

ATTENTION:
The information contained in this message may be legally privileged and confidential. It is intended to be read only by the individual or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that any distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and/or Fenwick & West LLP by telephone at (650) 988-8500 and delete or destroy any copy of this message.

Erick Bergquist

2006-01-27, 8:49 pm

The matrix was recently updated, and exchange 2003 SP2
is ok now - you may need to rerun current version of
permission wizard depending on unity versions, etc.
See the matrix for more details.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td...ty/msupdate.htm

Exchange 2003 for Voicemail only is not supported.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products...2a.html#wp34621

--- Stu Packett <SPackett@fenwick.com> wrote:

> Exchange 2003 SP2 is not yet supported. According
> to this Exchange blog
> run by Exchange engineers, Unity maybe related to a
> blackberry and
> GoodLink issue they are working on.
>
>
http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/a.../13/417440.aspx
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On
> Behalf Of Voll, Scott
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 7:44 AM
> To: Martin Lohnert
> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: CORRECTION RE: [cisco-voip] Windows 2003
> SP2
>
>
>
> Thanks Martin. I meant Exchange 2003 sp 2.
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Martin Lohnert [mailto:lohnert@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 4:00 AM
> To: Voll, Scott
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows 2003 SP2
>
>
>
> HI Scott,
>
> Where did you find out about W2003 SP2? I don't
> think there is such a
> beast yet

Or do you mean Windows 2003 R2 ?
>
> Cheers,
>
> ML
>
>
>
> On 1/23/06, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll@wesd.org> wrote:
>
>
> Is Windows 2003 SP2 approved for UM Unity 4.0.5?
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
--------------------------------------------------------
>
> IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance
> with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you
> that any U.S. federal tax advice in this
> communication (including attachments) is not
> intended or written by Fenwick & West LLP to be
> used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i)
> avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code
> or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to
> another party any transaction or matter addressed
> herein.
>
--------------------------------------------------------
>
> ATTENTION:
> The information contained in this message may be
> legally privileged and confidential. It is intended
> to be read only by the individual or entity to whom
> it is addressed or by their designee. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you
> are on notice that any distribution of this message,
> in any form, is strictly prohibited.
>
> If you have received this message in error, please
> immediately notify the sender and/or Fenwick & West
> LLP by telephone at (650) 988-8500 and delete or
> destroy any copy of this message.
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

________________________________________
__________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com