| Lelio Fulgenzi 2006-10-26, 7:11 pm |
| I don't think it's your fault Louis (unless of course you were at CIPTUG! ;)......There were plenty of NDA sessions to talk about stuff like this, and quite honestly, it's the place to talk about it rather than misdirect people to another product. It's hard not to believe that it is intentional sometimes.
But it's almost Friday..... ;)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"I can eat fifty eggs." "Nobody can eat fifty eggs."
----- Original Message -----
From: Louis Marascio (lmarasci)
To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; Justin Steinberg ; Steve Miller
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Remote 7961 Phone at Someone's House - NotesforSetup!
Lelio,
I'm sorry the messaging got confused after the acquisition. The original PhoneProxy product (called SCCP Proxy) that we built at Metreos was based on the CUAE. Prior to the acquisition, we at Metreos had started to rebuild this product as a standalone appliance. It has taken us some time after the acquisition to finish the integration, and thus finish the product. The product is indeed going to be available from Cisco, as a standalone appliance no longer based on or tied to the CUAE. In fact, it is orderable as of today!
Again, sorry for the confusion.
Best regards,
Louis
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:47 AM
To: Justin Steinberg; Steve Miller
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Remote 7961 Phone at Someone's House - NotesforSetup!
it's so frustrating when you ask about a product you know is there and you get told it's no longer available.
i'm pretty sure this was the Metreos product and i was told the product no longer exists and was being replaced by the app engine and you had to write it yourself!
grrrrrrrr
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"I can eat fifty eggs." "Nobody can eat fifty eggs."
----- Original Message -----
From: Justin Steinberg
To: Steve Miller
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Remote 7961 Phone at Someone's House - Notes forSetup!
If you are planning to deploy a lot of these setups you should ask your SE about the phone proxy product.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps7057/index.html
On 10/25/06, Steve Miller <millerman1@cox.net> wrote:
The following is information that I have rec'd regarding the installation of a 7961 at someone's house who is using cable or DSL. Is there anything else that we might need to think about? Thank you!
Notes from cisco Engineer:
The remote equipment at the home office would consist of a cisco 871 router and a cisco phone with a power block. The cisco 871 would function as the home office's firewall and router (and would connect to either a cable modem or a DSL modem depending on the site). The router would be configured to have an IPSec tunnel back to the office network (most likely configured off of your existing concentrator). The remote cisco 871 would be configured with DHCP and have the TFTP scope option set to tell all devices the IP address of the Call Manager server (note the router has a built-in four port switch).
At that point, the IP Phone would register normally to the Call Manager servers using the IPSec tunnel as it's communication path. The keepalives from the phone to the CM servers would keep the IPSec tunnel up and running 24/7.
The restrictions on this type of deployment are:
-must use G729 codec due to bandwidth restrictions
-extremely limited QoS control since we are going across the Internet
-security policies need to be visited since the remote office would have access to the corporate internal network (this one is a biggie)
-sub-issue regarding calling from home office to home office. This is doable but adds additional security and deployment issues.
-need to consider the standard IT management overhead associated with supporting home equipment.
Thank you!
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
|