Voice over IP Cisco - extensions starting with 0

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > October 2006 > extensions starting with 0





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author extensions starting with 0
IT

2006-10-31, 7:12 pm

We are about to add a branch office with extensions that are 02XX. They
currently use 3-digit extensions, on a PBX. We will be putting them on
our callmanager with a 2801 onsite. The current dilemma is whether to
let them keep 3 digit extensions? This may be a problem since we
currently use 4-digits and we have extensions that begin with 2, so the
interdigit timeout could be a problem.
The other option is to go with a 4-digit extension and start with a 0. I
guess the problem will be our current translation pattern that passes
people who dial 0 to the operator. I don't think many people use this
feature, so it wouldn't be too much of a problem to turn off. Is there
any other issue with using extensions that begin with zero that I may be
overlooking?

Thank you,
Avidan
Jonathan Charles

2006-10-31, 7:12 pm

Let them keep their three digit extensions, create a translation pattern for
everyone else for 0XXX to XXX...

However, THEY need to dial 4-digit to get to everyone else...

Be aware that if you have a 0 pattern with urgent priority, you will never
hit this pattern...




Jonathan

On 10/31/06, IT <it@cimgroup.com> wrote:
>
> We are about to add a branch office with extensions that are 02XX. They
> currently use 3-digit extensions, on a PBX. We will be putting them on
> our callmanager with a 2801 onsite. The current dilemma is whether to
> let them keep 3 digit extensions? This may be a problem since we
> currently use 4-digits and we have extensions that begin with 2, so the
> interdigit timeout could be a problem.
> The other option is to go with a 4-digit extension and start with a 0. I
> guess the problem will be our current translation pattern that passes
> people who dial 0 to the operator. I don't think many people use this
> feature, so it wouldn't be too much of a problem to turn off. Is there
> any other issue with using extensions that begin with zero that I may be
> overlooking?
>
> Thank you,
> Avidan
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>


Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com