|
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > December 2006 > Unity design question...
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Unity design question...
|
|
| Jonathan Charles 2006-11-30, 1:11 am |
| Have a customer considering cisco IPT.
They have nine different Exchange organizations that DO NOT trust each other
(making them trust each other is NOT an option).
Customer wants to know if there is a solution that does not include buying
nine Unity servers and using digital networking. They want unified
messaging, and they are unwilling to redesign their multiple
organizations...
Is there a way to do this?
Jonathan
| |
| Carter, Bill 2006-11-30, 1:11 pm |
| Unity Connection with "Integrated" Messaging.
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Charles
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 11:53 PM
To: cisco-voip
Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity design question...
Have a customer considering cisco IPT.
They have nine different Exchange organizations that DO NOT trust each
other (making them trust each other is NOT an option).
Customer wants to know if there is a solution that does not include
buying nine Unity servers and using digital networking. They want
unified messaging, and they are unwilling to redesign their multiple
organizations...
Is there a way to do this?
Jonathan
| |
| Fred Nielsen 2006-12-01, 7:11 pm |
| Or Unity full version with "Integrated" Messaging.
For "Integrated" (IMAP) configurations, the decision points between
Connection or regular really comes down to whether they need fault-tolerance
(failover) and how far they need the solution to scale in terms of
mailboxes/storage.
There is no way to have a single Unity server addressing subscribers
distributed across multiple Exchange organizations/sites in a true "Unified"
configuration.
-- Fred Nielsen
_____
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Carter, Bill
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 6:34 AM
To: Jonathan Charles; cisco-voip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity design question...
Unity Connection with "Integrated" Messaging.
_____
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 11:53 PM
To: cisco-voip
Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity design question...
Have a customer considering cisco IPT.
They have nine different Exchange organizations that DO NOT trust each other
(making them trust each other is NOT an option).
Customer wants to know if there is a solution that does not include buying
nine Unity servers and using digital networking. They want unified
messaging, and they are unwilling to redesign their multiple
organizations...
Is there a way to do this?
Jonathan
|
|
|
|
|