Voice over IP Cisco - ETA for CallManager 5.1 on CCO?

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > December 2006 > ETA for CallManager 5.1 on CCO?





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author ETA for CallManager 5.1 on CCO?
Lelio Fulgenzi

2006-12-11, 7:11 pm

Does anyone know of an ETA for CallManager 5.1 on CCO?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Network Analyst (CCS)
University of Guelph Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Sanity First : Number of days with less than
50 messages in my inbox at the end of the day: buffer overrun
Fred Nielsen

2006-12-12, 1:11 pm

Scheduled to post today. Not there yet however. Keep your eyes out.

-- Fred Nielsen

_____

From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 3:06 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] ETA for CallManager 5.1 on CCO?


Does anyone know of an ETA for CallManager 5.1 on CCO?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Network Analyst (CCS)
University of Guelph Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Sanity First : Number of days with less than
50 messages in my inbox at the end of the day: buffer overrun

Jonathan Charles

2006-12-12, 7:11 pm

Well, there is a selection for CCM5.1, but no files yet.



Jonathan

On 12/12/06, Fred Nielsen <fwn@feasible.net> wrote:
>
> Scheduled to post today. Not there yet however. Keep your eyes out.
>
> -- Fred Nielsen
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Lelio Fulgenzi
> *Sent:* Monday, December 11, 2006 3:06 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] ETA for CallManager 5.1 on CCO?
>
> Does anyone know of an ETA for CallManager 5.1 on CCO?
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Network Analyst (CCS)
> university of Guelph Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Sanity First : Number of days with less than
> 50 messages in my inbox at the end of the day: buffer overrun
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>


Voll, Scott

2006-12-12, 7:11 pm

It's not on the PUT either.



Scott



________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Charles
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 11:12 AM
To: Fred Nielsen
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] ETA for CallManager 5.1 on CCO?



Well, there is a selection for CCM5.1, but no files yet.



Jonathan

On 12/12/06, Fred Nielsen <fwn@feasible.net > wrote:

Scheduled to post today. Not there yet however. Keep your eyes out.



-- Fred Nielsen



________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 3:06 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] ETA for CallManager 5.1 on CCO?

Does anyone know of an ETA for CallManager 5.1 on CCO?



------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Network Analyst (CCS)
University of Guelph Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Sanity First : Number of days with less than
50 messages in my inbox at the end of the day: buffer overrun


________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip






Wes Sisk

2006-12-12, 7:12 pm

________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Wes Sisk

2006-12-19, 7:11 pm

You might check the website now.
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/callmgr-51

/Wes

Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> Does anyone know of an ETA for CallManager 5.1 on CCO?
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Network Analyst (CCS)
> university of Guelph Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Sanity First : Number of days with less than
> 50 messages in my inbox at the end of the day: buffer overrun
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

Jonathan Charles

2006-12-19, 7:11 pm

Wait a second here...

I just read the readme for 5.1(1) and I was told (officially) that
CCM5.1would be based on
CCM4.2 and would have 4.2 features.

There is no mention of Log In To Hunt Group or CFUR...


We was robbed!



Jonathan

On 12/19/06, Wes Sisk <wsisk@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> You might check the website now.
> http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/callmgr-51
>
> /Wes
>
> Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>


Matt Slaga \(US\)

2006-12-19, 7:11 pm

There is no feature parity with 4.2/5.1 yet. Also, 6.0 lost the "OS
independent" option as well.

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Charles
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 3:00 PM
To: Wes Sisk
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] ETA for CallManager 5.1 on CCO?


Wait a second here...

I just read the readme for 5.1(1) and I was told (officially) that
CCM5.1 would be based on CCM4.2 and would have 4.2 features.

There is no mention of Log In To Hunt Group or CFUR...


We was robbed!



Jonathan


On 12/19/06, Wes Sisk <wsisk@cisco.com> wrote:

You might check the website now.
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/callmgr-51

/Wes

Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:

> Does anyone know of an ETA for CallManager 5.1 on CCO?

>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Network Analyst (CCS)
> university of Guelph Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Sanity First : Number of days with less than
> 50 messages in my inbox at the end of the day: buffer
overrun
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
_______________________________________
________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip






-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.

Jonathan Charles

2006-12-19, 7:11 pm

So, it is all vaporware...

We were given an official launch breifing less than a year ago, by Cisco,
that gave the release train index.

This is how it was laid out:

CCM5.0 would have feature parity with 4.1 (with SIP crap), and would be
released March 7 (or so) 2006.
CCM5.1 would have feature partity with 4.2 and would be released at end of
CY2006 (which they did).
CCM6.0 would be platform independent and Appliance and Windows versions
would have feature parity and licensing for both, and would be released end
of CY2007.

So, they seem to be hitting their release dates, but blowing off their
feature releases.

Let me guess, the Windows version with SIP support will be released in 2009
on version 8.0 of CCM...




Jonathan


On 12/19/06, Matt Slaga (US) <Matt.Slaga@us.didata.com> wrote:
>
> There is no feature parity with 4.2/5.1 yet. Also, 6.0 lost the "OS
> independent" option as well.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Charles
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 19, 2006 3:00 PM
> *To:* Wes Sisk
> *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] ETA for CallManager 5.1 on CCO?
>
> Wait a second here...
>
> I just read the readme for 5.1(1) and I was told (officially) that CCM5.1would be based on
> CCM4.2 and would have 4.2 features.
>
> There is no mention of Log In To Hunt Group or CFUR...
>
>
> We was robbed!
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On 12/19/06, Wes Sisk <wsisk@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> ------------------------------
>
> * Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you. *
>


Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com