Voice over IP Cisco - IP Phones unregisters at the same time CCM 4.1(3)sr1

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > February 2006 > IP Phones unregisters at the same time CCM 4.1(3)sr1





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author IP Phones unregisters at the same time CCM 4.1(3)sr1
Jose Robles

2006-02-08, 5:45 pm

I have an isue using CM 4.1.3(sr1). 19 Ip Phones 7960 unregisters many
of them at the same time. Ussually at 4pm or 5pm or later when there is
not much activity at the site. I've seen this problem in another forum
people complaining with the same situation. This are the Reason code 8
events in the event viewer and in the CCM Trace folder log:


02/06/2006 17:42:28.587 CCM|DeviceUnregistered - Device unregistered.
Device name.:SEP0013193E52AB Device IP address.:172.16.x.x Device type.
[Optional]:7 Device description [Optional].:Description Phone Reason
Code [Optional].:8 App ID:Cisco CallManager Cluster ID:1902-Cluster Node
ID:172.17.x.x|<CLID::1902-Cluster><NID::172.17.x.x><CT::AlarmSEP0013193E
52AB><DEV::SEP0013193E52AB>


The description for Event ID ( 3 ) in Source ( cisco CallManager )
cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry
information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote
computer. You may be able to use the /AUXSOURCE= flag to retrieve this
description; see Help and Support for details. The following information
is part of the event: DeviceUnregistered - Device unregistered.
Device name.: SEP0012D9B95154
Device IP address.: 172.17.x.x
Device type. [Optional]: 7
Device description [Optional].: Sistemas
Reason Code [Optional].: 8
App ID: cisco CallManager
Cluster ID: 1902-Cluster
Node ID: 172.17.x.x
Explanation: A device that has previously registered with Cisco
CallManager has unregistered. This event may be issued as part of normal
unregistration event or due to some other reason such as loss of
keepalives.
Recommended Action: No action is required if unregistration of this
device was expected..


I think we are hitting a bug in 4.1.3 sr1. Any ideas?



Thanks again,







Jose A. Robles
Sr. Network Consultant
CCNP, CCDP
CQS Routing and Lan Switching Specialist
Netxar Technologies, Inc. - www.netxar.com
17 Ponce Street
San Juan, PR 00917
ph: +1 787 765 0058 x2015
fax: +1 787 756 5362
cel: +1 787 547-0149
email jose.robles@netxar.com






Lelio Fulgenzi

2006-02-08, 5:45 pm

Could this be the SATA bug in the new servers? Something like 100%CPU every five hours?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Network Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"I had a coffee and Coke at lunch today...and now, I've got more jitter than an
IP phone on a long haul 10base2 connection" LFJ
----- Original Message -----
From: Jose Robles
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:37 PM
Subject: [cisco-voip] IP Phones unregisters at the same time CCM 4.1(3)sr1


I have an isue using CM 4.1.3(sr1). 19 Ip Phones 7960 unregisters many of them at the same time. Ussually at 4pm or 5pm or later when there is not much activity at the site. I've seen this problem in another forum people complaining with the same situation. This are the Reason code 8 events in the event viewer and in the CCM Trace folder log:


02/06/2006 17:42:28.587 CCM|DeviceUnregistered - Device unregistered. Device name.:SEP0013193E52AB Device IP address.:172.16.x.x Device type. [Optional]:7 Device description [Optional].:Description Phone Reason Code [Optional].:8 App ID:Cisco CallManager Cluster ID:1902-Cluster Node ID:172.17.x.x|<CLID::1902-Cluster><NID::172.17.x.x><CT::AlarmSEP0013193E52AB><DEV::SEP0013193E52AB>


The description for Event ID ( 3 ) in Source ( cisco CallManager ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. You may be able to use the /AUXSOURCE= flag to retrieve this description; see Help and Support for details. The following information is part of the event: DeviceUnregistered - Device unregistered.
Device name.: SEP0012D9B95154
Device IP address.: 172.17.x.x
Device type. [Optional]: 7
Device description [Optional].: Sistemas
Reason Code [Optional].: 8
App ID: cisco CallManager
Cluster ID: 1902-Cluster
Node ID: 172.17.x.x
Explanation: A device that has previously registered with cisco CallManager has unregistered. This event may be issued as part of normal unregistration event or due to some other reason such as loss of keepalives.
Recommended Action: No action is required if unregistration of this device was expected..


I think we are hitting a bug in 4.1.3 sr1. Any ideas?



Thanks again,







Jose A. Robles
Sr. Network Consultant
CCNP, CCDP
CQS Routing and Lan Switching Specialist
Netxar Technologies, Inc. - www.netxar.com
17 Ponce Street
San Juan, PR 00917
ph: +1 787 765 0058 x2015
fax: +1 787 756 5362
cel: +1 787 547-0149
email jose.robles@netxar.com







------------------------------------------------------------------------------


________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Wes Sisk

2006-02-08, 5:45 pm

8 =3D device initiated reset, but CM cannot be trusted in these matters. =

it only reports what it perceives to be the problem.

the phone reports what it believes to be the problem in the ALARM =

message in the CCM traces when it re-registers to CM, either the primary =

CM or the backup CM.

1. open cmd prompt
2. "cd \prog*\cisco\trace\ccm"
3. findstr Last=3D ccm*.txt >last.txt
4. notepad last.txt

The text after the word "last" is the phone's point of view of why it =

unregistered. It is usually more informative (31 possible values as =

opposed to 12 possible for CM).

Why does the phone say it unregistered?

Jose Robles wrote:
>
> I have an isue using CM 4.1.3(sr1). 19 Ip Phones 7960 unregisters many =


> of them at the same time. Ussually at 4pm or 5pm or later when there =


> is not much activity at the site. I=92ve seen this problem in another =


> forum people complaining with the same situation. This are the Reason =


> code 8 events in the event viewer and in the CCM Trace folder log:
>
>
> 02/06/2006 17:42:28.587 CCM|DeviceUnregistered - Device unregistered. =


> Device name.:SEP0013193E52AB Device IP address.:172.16.x.x Device =


> type. [Optional]:7 Device description [Optional].:Description Phone =


> Reason Code [Optional].:8 App ID:Cisco CallManager Cluster =


> ID:1902-Cluster Node =


> ID:172.17.x.x|<CLID::1902-Cluster><NID::172.17.x.x><CT::AlarmSEP0013193E5=

2AB><DEV::SEP0013193E52AB> =

>
>
>
> The description for Event ID ( 3 ) in Source ( cisco CallManager ) =


> cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary =


> registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a =


> remote computer. You may be able to use the /AUXSOURCE=3D flag to =


> retrieve this description; see Help and Support for details. The =


> following information is part of the event: DeviceUnregistered - =


> Device unregistered.
> Device name.: SEP0012D9B95154
> Device IP address.: 172.17.x.x
> Device type. [Optional]: 7
> Device description [Optional].: Sistemas
> Reason Code [Optional].: 8
> App ID: cisco CallManager
> Cluster ID: 1902-Cluster
> Node ID: 172.17.x.x
> Explanation: A device that has previously registered with cisco =


> CallManager has unregistered. This event may be issued as part of =


> normal unregistration event or due to some other reason such as loss =


> of keepalives.
> Recommended Action: No action is required if unregistration of this =


> device was expected..
>
>
> I think we are hitting a bug in 4.1.3 sr1. Any ideas?
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Jose A. Robles
> Sr. Network Consultant
> CCNP, CCDP
> CQS Routing and Lan Switching Specialist
> Netxar Technologies, Inc. - www.netxar.com <http://www.netxar.com>
> 17 Ponce Street
> San Juan, PR 00917
> ph: +1 787 765 0058 x2015
> fax: +1 787 756 5362
> cel: +1 787 547-0149
> email jose.robles@netxar.com <mailto:jose.robles@netxar.com>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> =

Ed Leatherman

2006-02-08, 5:45 pm

I see large groups of resets sometimes during odd hours that are DHCP leases
expiring or some such similar.

On 2/8/06, Wes Sisk <wsisk@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> 8 = device initiated reset, but CM cannot be trusted in these matters.
> it only reports what it perceives to be the problem.
>
> the phone reports what it believes to be the problem in the ALARM
> message in the CCM traces when it re-registers to CM, either the primary
> CM or the backup CM.
>
> 1. open cmd prompt
> 2. "cd \prog*\cisco\trace\ccm"
> 3. findstr Last= ccm*.txt >last.txt
> 4. notepad last.txt
>
> The text after the word "last" is the phone's point of view of why it
> unregistered. It is usually more informative (31 possible values as
> opposed to 12 possible for CM).
>
> Why does the phone say it unregistered?
>
> Jose Robles wrote:
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>




--
Ed Leatherman
IP Telephony Coordinator
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations
Jose Robles

2006-02-08, 5:45 pm

Here is what it says for the re-registers for one of the devices. There
is nothing with the "last" keyword. Hope this helps. Thanks all.



02/05/2006 20:25:17.802 CCM|DeviceUnregistered - Device unregistered.
Device name.:SEP0012D9845906 Device IP address.:172.16.25.11 Device
type. [Optional]:7 Device description [Optional].:HelpDesk - Desc Reason
Code [Optional].:9 App ID:Cisco CallManager Cluster ID:OGP19022B-Cluster
Node
ID:172.17.1.11|<CLID::OGP19022B-Cluster><NID::172.17.1.11><CT::AlarmSEP0
012D9845906><DEV::SEP0012D9845906>

02/05/2006 20:25:17.817 CCM|Socket Broken. DeviceName=Unknown, TCPPid =
[2.100.132.8876], IPAddr=Unknown IP Address, Port=0x0, Device
Controller=[0,0,0]|<CLID::OGP19022B-Cluster><NID::172.17.1.11><CT::2,100
,132,8876.1><IP::><DEV::>

02/05/2006 20:25:54.365 CCM|LineControl(8930) - registered with
Duplicate DeviceName SEP0012D9845906, force the device to do the
reregister: single device
case|<CLID::OGP19022B-Cluster><NID::172.17.1.11><CT::1,100,119,1.5012886
><IP::172.16.25.11><DEV::SEP0012D9845906>


02/05/2006 20:25:54.365 CCM|LineControl(8931) - registered with
Duplicate DeviceName SEP0012D9845906, force the device to do the
reregister: single device
case|<CLID::OGP19022B-Cluster><NID::172.17.1.11><CT::1,100,119,1.5012886
><IP::172.16.25.11><DEV::SEP0012D9845906>










-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Leatherman [mailto:ealeatherman@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 6:21 PM
To: Wes Sisk
Cc: Jose Robles; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phones unregisters at the same time CCM
4.1(3)sr1



I see large groups of resets sometimes during odd hours that are DHCP
leases expiring or some such similar.

On 2/8/06, Wes Sisk < wsisk@cisco.com <mailto:wsisk@cisco.com> > wrote:

8 = device initiated reset, but CM cannot be trusted in these matters.
it only reports what it perceives to be the problem.

the phone reports what it believes to be the problem in the ALARM
message in the CCM traces when it re-registers to CM, either the primary
CM or the backup CM.

1. open cmd prompt
2. "cd \prog*\cisco\trace\ccm"
3. findstr Last= ccm*.txt >last.txt
4. notepad last.txt

The text after the word "last" is the phone's point of view of why it
unregistered. It is usually more informative (31 possible values as
opposed to 12 possible for CM).

Why does the phone say it unregistered?

Jose Robles wrote:
>
> I have an isue using CM 4.1.3 (sr1). 19 Ip Phones 7960 unregisters

many
> of them at the same time. Ussually at 4pm or 5pm or later when there
> is not much activity at the site. I've seen this problem in another
> forum people complaining with the same situation. This are the Reason
> code 8 events in the event viewer and in the CCM Trace folder log:
>
>
> 02/06/2006 17:42:28.587 CCM|DeviceUnregistered - Device unregistered.
> Device name.:SEP0013193E52AB Device IP address.: 172.16.x.x Device
> type. [Optional]:7 Device description [Optional].:Description Phone
> Reason Code [Optional].:8 App ID:Cisco CallManager Cluster
> ID:1902-Cluster Node
> ID:172.17.x.x|<CLID::1902-Cluster><NID::

172.17.x.x><CT::AlarmSEP0013193E52AB><DEV::SEP0013193E52AB>
>
>
>
> The description for Event ID ( 3 ) in Source ( cisco CallManager )
> cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary
> registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a
> remote computer. You may be able to use the /AUXSOURCE= flag to
> retrieve this description; see Help and Support for details. The
> following information is part of the event: DeviceUnregistered -
> Device unregistered.
> Device name.: SEP0012D9B95154
> Device IP address.: 172.17.x.x
> Device type. [Optional]: 7
> Device description [Optional].: Sistemas
> Reason Code [Optional].: 8
> App ID: cisco CallManager
> Cluster ID: 1902-Cluster
> Node ID: 172.17.x.x
> Explanation: A device that has previously registered with Cisco
> CallManager has unregistered. This event may be issued as part of
> normal unregistration event or due to some other reason such as loss
> of keepalives.
> Recommended Action: No action is required if unregistration of this
> device was expected..
>
>
> I think we are hitting a bug in 4.1.3 sr1. Any ideas?
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Jose A. Robles
> Sr. Network Consultant
> CCNP, CCDP
> CQS Routing and Lan Switching Specialist
> Netxar Technologies, Inc. - www.netxar.com <http://www.netxar.com>
> 17 Ponce Street
> San Juan, PR 00917
> ph: +1 787 765 0058 x2015
> fax: +1 787 756 5362
> cel: +1 787 547-0149
> email jose.robles@netxar.com <mailto:jose.robles@netxar.com>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>


________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip




--
Ed Leatherman
IP Telephony Coordinator
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations


Wes Sisk

2006-02-09, 5:45 pm

are your CCM traces turned up to detailed? what model phones are these?

C:\Program Files\Cisco\Trace\CCM>findstr Last=3D ccm*.txt
ccm00000008.txt:02/07/2006 05:34:52.594 CCM|StationInit: (0000000) =

alarmSeverity=3D2 text=3D"1
4: Name=3DSEP00146947E9AC Load=3D 7.0(2SR1.0) Last=3DCM-closed-TCP" parm1=
=3D0(0) =

parm2=3D0(0).|<CLID
::EVOICE-R5-CM1-Cluster><NID::172.18.110.96><CT::1,100,119,1.315791><IP::14=
..48.40.138><DEV
::>

/Wes

Jose Robles wrote:
>
> Here is what it says for the re-registers for one of the devices. =


> There is nothing with the =93last=94 keyword. Hope this helps. Thanks all.
>
> 02/05/2006 20:25:17.802 CCM|DeviceUnregistered - Device unregistered. =


> Device name.:SEP0012D9845906 Device IP address.:172.16.25.11 Device =


> type. [Optional]:7 Device description [Optional].:HelpDesk - Desc =


> Reason Code [Optional].:9 App ID:Cisco CallManager Cluster =


> ID:OGP19022B-Cluster Node =


> ID:172.17.1.11|<CLID::OGP19022B-Cluster><NID::172.17.1.11><CT::AlarmSEP00=

12D9845906><DEV::SEP0012D9845906>
>
> 02/05/2006 20:25:17.817 CCM|Socket Broken. DeviceName=3DUnknown, TCPPid =


> =3D [2.100.132.8876], IPAddr=3DUnknown IP Address, Port=3D0x0, Device =


> Controller=3D[0,0,0]|<CLID::OGP19022B-Cluster><NID::172.17.1.11><CT::2,10=

0,132,8876.1><IP::><DEV::>
>
> 02/05/2006 20:25:54.365 CCM|LineControl(8930) - registered with =


> Duplicate DeviceName SEP0012D9845906, force the device to do the =


> reregister: single device =


> case|<CLID::OGP19022B-Cluster><NID::172.17.1.11><CT::1,100,119,1.5012886>=

<IP::172.16.25.11><DEV::SEP0012D9845906>
>
> 02/05/2006 20:25:54.365 CCM|LineControl(8931) - registered with =


> Duplicate DeviceName SEP0012D9845906, force the device to do the =


> reregister: single device =


> case|<CLID::OGP19022B-Cluster><NID::172.17.1.11><CT::1,100,119,1.5012886>=

<IP::172.16.25.11><DEV::SEP0012D9845906>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Ed Leatherman [mailto:ealeatherman@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 08, 2006 6:21 PM
> *To:* Wes Sisk
> *Cc:* Jose Robles; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] IP Phones unregisters at the same time CCM =


> 4.1(3)sr1
>
> I see large groups of resets sometimes during odd hours that are DHCP =


> leases expiring or some such similar.
>
> On 2/8/06, *Wes Sisk* < wsisk@cisco.com <mailto:wsisk@cisco.com>> wrote:
>
> 8 =3D device initiated reset, but CM cannot be trusted in these matters.
> it only reports what it perceives to be the problem.
>
> the phone reports what it believes to be the problem in the ALARM
> message in the CCM traces when it re-registers to CM, either the primary
> CM or the backup CM.
>
> 1. open cmd prompt
> 2. "cd \prog*\cisco\trace\ccm"
> 3. findstr Last=3D ccm*.txt >last.txt
> 4. notepad last.txt
>
> The text after the word "last" is the phone's point of view of why it
> unregistered. It is usually more informative (31 possible values as
> opposed to 12 possible for CM).
>
> Why does the phone say it unregistered?
>
> Jose Robles wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> 172.17.x.x><CT::AlarmSEP0013193E52AB><DEV::SEP0013193E52AB>
[vbcol=seagreen]
> <http://www.netxar.com>
[vbcol=seagreen]
> <mailto:jose.robles@netxar.com <mailto:jose.robles@netxar.com>>
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
> -- =


> Ed Leatherman
> IP Telephony Coordinator
> West Virginia University
> Telecommunications and Network Operations
>

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com