|
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > June 2006 > Stable Call Mgr Version
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Stable Call Mgr Version
|
|
| Ortiz, Carlos 2006-06-23, 1:11 pm |
| Can anyone suggest a stable CM version and IPCC Express that they have
successfully running?
I am currently running 4.02a(sr2b) with IPCC 3.5.2 and Unity 4.05.
I would like to move to Call Mgr version 4.1.3 or 4.2 (if recommended).
I also realize that IPCC Express will need to be upgraded as part of
this.
Thanks,
Carlos
| |
| Ted Nugent 2006-06-23, 1:11 pm |
| Well you're running on probably the most stable
version of CM that 4.x has to offer... Other then that
I would probably run with CM4.1(3)SR2... I've seen
some issues with SR3 and thier still working them
out... sr2b just came out the other day. I've only
deployed Unity 4.1 a few times and each went very
smoothly with very few followups.. (but 4.0(5) wasn't
a bad release either... unless there are features
you're looking for I would stick with 4.0(5))
I personally would not touch CM/Unity 4.2 yet...
they're both fairly new... I would probably give them
a couple month.
IPCC 3.5.3 SR3 seemed to be pretty stable as well...
You could not pay me enough to support IPCCX 4.x
yet... they are getting closer with newer releases but
right now.. no way.. no how!
You can also reference "golden bridge" at the link
below.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td...nk/ipcmtrix.htm
--- "Ortiz, Carlos" <CORTIZ@broward.org> wrote:
> Can anyone suggest a stable CM version and IPCC
> Express that they have
> successfully running?
>
>
>
> I am currently running 4.02a(sr2b) with IPCC 3.5.2
> and Unity 4.05.
>
>
>
> I would like to move to Call Mgr version 4.1.3 or
> 4.2 (if recommended).
> I also realize that IPCC Express will need to be
> upgraded as part of
> this.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Carlos
>
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
________________________________________
__________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
| |
| Ted Nugent 2006-06-23, 1:11 pm |
| Yep.. thanks for the catch
--- "Jason Aarons (US)" <jason.aarons@us.didata.com>
wrote:
> I think you had a typo sr2b doesn't exist, there is
> a ciscocm.4-1-3-sr3b.exe on CCO that came out this
> week -jason
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net on behalf
> of Ted Nugent
> Sent: Fri 6/23/2006 10:39 AM
> To: Ortiz, Carlos; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Stable Call Mgr Version
>
>
>
> Well you're running on probably the most stable
> version of CM that 4.x has to offer... Other then
> that
> I would probably run with CM4.1(3)SR2... I've seen
> some issues with SR3 and thier still working them
> out... sr2b just came out the other day. I've only
> deployed Unity 4.1 a few times and each went very
> smoothly with very few followups.. (but 4.0(5)
> wasn't
> a bad release either... unless there are features
> you're looking for I would stick with 4.0(5))
>
> I personally would not touch CM/Unity 4.2 yet...
> they're both fairly new... I would probably give
> them
> a couple month.
>
> IPCC 3.5.3 SR3 seemed to be pretty stable as well...
> You could not pay me enough to support IPCCX 4.x
> yet... they are getting closer with newer releases
> but
> right now.. no way.. no how!
> You can also reference "golden bridge" at the link
> below.
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td...nk/ipcmtrix.htm
>
>
> --- "Ortiz, Carlos" <CORTIZ@broward.org> wrote:
>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> ________________________________________
__________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Disclaimer:
>
> This e-mail communication and any attachments may
> contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for
> use by the
> designated addressee(s) named above only. If you
> are not the
> intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you
> have received
> this communication in error and that any use or
> reproduction of
> this email or its contents is strictly prohibited
> and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this communication
> in error, please
> notify us immediately by replying to this message
> and deleting it
> from your computer. Thank you.
>
________________________________________
__________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
| |
| Ortiz, Carlos 2006-06-23, 1:11 pm |
| So according to this matrix CM 4.1.3 SR1 is supported with IPC 3.5.3 but
if you apply SR2 to CM then you have to upgrade IPCC to 4.x....does that
make any sense?
-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Nugent [mailto:tednugent69@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 10:40 AM
To: Ortiz, Carlos; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Stable Call Mgr Version
Well you're running on probably the most stable
version of CM that 4.x has to offer... Other then that
I would probably run with CM4.1(3)SR2... I've seen
some issues with SR3 and thier still working them
out... sr2b just came out the other day. I've only
deployed Unity 4.1 a few times and each went very
smoothly with very few followups.. (but 4.0(5) wasn't
a bad release either... unless there are features
you're looking for I would stick with 4.0(5))
I personally would not touch CM/Unity 4.2 yet...
they're both fairly new... I would probably give them
a couple month.
IPCC 3.5.3 SR3 seemed to be pretty stable as well...
You could not pay me enough to support IPCCX 4.x
yet... they are getting closer with newer releases but
right now.. no way.. no how!
You can also reference "golden bridge" at the link
below.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td...tele/gblink/ipc
mtrix.htm
--- "Ortiz, Carlos" <CORTIZ@broward.org> wrote:
> Can anyone suggest a stable CM version and IPCC
> Express that they have
> successfully running?
>
>
>
> I am currently running 4.02a(sr2b) with IPCC 3.5.2
> and Unity 4.05.
>
>
>
> I would like to move to Call Mgr version 4.1.3 or
> 4.2 (if recommended).
> I also realize that IPCC Express will need to be
> upgraded as part of
> this.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Carlos
>
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
________________________________________
__________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
| |
| Ted Nugent 2006-06-23, 1:11 pm |
| Ahhh yes.. This is mistake that all of my SEs have
made at one time or another... I apologize I should
have clarified... this is NOT the CM compatibility
matrix.. This is cisco IPT test release "aka Golden
Bridge". cisco takes groupings of HW/SW and tests them
all together to try and find the best matches at a
given life cycle. They then document the bugs and
problems with interoperability. In a nutshell that is
the purpose of the GB. It's not perfect but it
provides an outline to build off of and which in a
Cisco Partner environment gives us a leg to stand on
when things go south. We try and follow GB for any new
releases that we bring to a customer (and intermix
that with field experience).
The CM compatibility matrix is here
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td...lmg/ccmcomp.htm
And the CRS/IPCCX matrix is here
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td...to/crscomtx.pdf
--- "Ortiz, Carlos" <CORTIZ@broward.org> wrote:
> So according to this matrix CM 4.1.3 SR1 is
> supported with IPC 3.5.3 but
> if you apply SR2 to CM then you have to upgrade IPCC
> to 4.x....does that
> make any sense?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Nugent [mailto:tednugent69@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 10:40 AM
> To: Ortiz, Carlos; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Stable Call Mgr Version
>
> Well you're running on probably the most stable
> version of CM that 4.x has to offer... Other then
> that
> I would probably run with CM4.1(3)SR2... I've seen
> some issues with SR3 and thier still working them
> out... sr2b just came out the other day. I've only
> deployed Unity 4.1 a few times and each went very
> smoothly with very few followups.. (but 4.0(5)
> wasn't
> a bad release either... unless there are features
> you're looking for I would stick with 4.0(5))
>
> I personally would not touch CM/Unity 4.2 yet...
> they're both fairly new... I would probably give
> them
> a couple month.
>
> IPCC 3.5.3 SR3 seemed to be pretty stable as well...
> You could not pay me enough to support IPCCX 4.x
> yet... they are getting closer with newer releases
> but
> right now.. no way.. no how!
> You can also reference "golden bridge" at the link
> below.
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td...tele/gblink/ipc
> mtrix.htm
>
>
> --- "Ortiz, Carlos" <CORTIZ@broward.org> wrote:
>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> ________________________________________
__________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
________________________________________
__________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
| |
| Jonathan Charles 2006-06-24, 7:11 am |
| By far, the most stable and fastest version of CallManager is
3.3(5)sr2b... none of that having to wait for some app while
configuring the system... and it is rock stable.
Jonathan
On 6/23/06, Ortiz, Carlos <CORTIZ@broward.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Can anyone suggest a stable CM version and IPCC Express that they have
> successfully running?
>
>
>
> I am currently running 4.02a(sr2b) with IPCC 3.5.2 and Unity 4.05.
>
>
>
> I would like to move to Call Mgr version 4.1.3 or 4.2 (if recommended). I
> also realize that IPCC Express will need to be upgraded as part of this.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Carlos
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
| |
| Jonathan Charles 2006-06-24, 7:11 am |
| Are you looking at this:
http://www.cisco.com/application/pd...a00803d82f5.pdf
Cuz, I am running 4.1(3)sr3b with IPCC 3.5(2)sr3 and page 48 of that
compatibility guide shows 3.5(3)sr3 being supported in 4.1(3)sr3a (and
I have it running with 4.1(3)sr3b (which came out last week).
In fact, that shows 3.5(4) supporting CCM4.2... So, I am not sure what
you are looking at...
Jonathan
On 6/23/06, Ortiz, Carlos <CORTIZ@broward.org> wrote:
> So according to this matrix CM 4.1.3 SR1 is supported with IPC 3.5.3 but
> if you apply SR2 to CM then you have to upgrade IPCC to 4.x....does that
> make any sense?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Nugent [mailto:tednugent69@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 10:40 AM
> To: Ortiz, Carlos; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Stable Call Mgr Version
>
> Well you're running on probably the most stable
> version of CM that 4.x has to offer... Other then that
> I would probably run with CM4.1(3)SR2... I've seen
> some issues with SR3 and thier still working them
> out... sr2b just came out the other day. I've only
> deployed Unity 4.1 a few times and each went very
> smoothly with very few followups.. (but 4.0(5) wasn't
> a bad release either... unless there are features
> you're looking for I would stick with 4.0(5))
>
> I personally would not touch CM/Unity 4.2 yet...
> they're both fairly new... I would probably give them
> a couple month.
>
> IPCC 3.5.3 SR3 seemed to be pretty stable as well...
> You could not pay me enough to support IPCCX 4.x
> yet... they are getting closer with newer releases but
> right now.. no way.. no how!
> You can also reference "golden bridge" at the link
> below.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td...tele/gblink/ipc
> mtrix.htm
>
>
> --- "Ortiz, Carlos" <CORTIZ@broward.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
__________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
| |
| Ed Leatherman 2006-06-24, 7:11 am |
| CCM 4.1.3 has been pretty solid for us.
We just deployed IPCC Express 4.0(x) and are already running into multiple
bugs with it.. I think maybe if you can hold off on the 3.X versions of that
you might want to for now.. just based on our experience so far and what i'm
reading here.
We're looking at upgrading Unity from 4.0.4, either to 4.1 or 4.2.. fwiw I
had a engineer from cisco tell me this week that he recommended 4.2.
On 6/23/06, Ortiz, Carlos <CORTIZ@broward.org> wrote:
>
> Can anyone suggest a stable CM version and IPCC Express that they have
> successfully running?
>
>
>
> I am currently running 4.02a(sr2b) with IPCC 3.5.2 and Unity 4.05.
>
>
>
> I would like to move to Call Mgr version 4.1.3 or 4.2 (if recommended). I
> also realize that IPCC Express will need to be upgraded as part of this.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Carlos
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
IP Telephony Coordinator
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations
| |
| Ortiz, Carlos 2006-06-25, 1:11 am |
| I need to look again, but I think Ted explained that the Golden Bridge DOC is really just a subset of the compat matrix. In any case if you are running 4.1.3 sr3b and IPCC 3.5(2) sr3 then great....that seems like a good combo for me as it gets me to a CM version I want and doesn't affect the IPCC install that much (just a new sr for me). Any glaring issues when you upgraded to these versions?
Carlos
________________________________
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonvoip@gmail.com]
Sent: Fri 6/23/2006 10:45 PM
To: Ortiz, Carlos
Cc: Ted Nugent; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Stable Call Mgr Version
Are you looking at this:
http://www.cisco.com/application/pd...a00803d82f5.pdf
Cuz, I am running 4.1(3)sr3b with IPCC 3.5(2)sr3 and page 48 of that
compatibility guide shows 3.5(3)sr3 being supported in 4.1(3)sr3a (and
I have it running with 4.1(3)sr3b (which came out last week).
In fact, that shows 3.5(4) supporting CCM4.2... So, I am not sure what
you are looking at...
Jonathan
On 6/23/06, Ortiz, Carlos <CORTIZ@broward.org> wrote:
> So according to this matrix CM 4.1.3 SR1 is supported with IPC 3.5.3 but
> if you apply SR2 to CM then you have to upgrade IPCC to 4.x....does that
> make any sense?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Nugent [mailto:tednugent69@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 10:40 AM
> To: Ortiz, Carlos; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Stable Call Mgr Version
>
> Well you're running on probably the most stable
> version of CM that 4.x has to offer... Other then that
> I would probably run with CM4.1(3)SR2... I've seen
> some issues with SR3 and thier still working them
> out... sr2b just came out the other day. I've only
> deployed Unity 4.1 a few times and each went very
> smoothly with very few followups.. (but 4.0(5) wasn't
> a bad release either... unless there are features
> you're looking for I would stick with 4.0(5))
>
> I personally would not touch CM/Unity 4.2 yet...
> they're both fairly new... I would probably give them
> a couple month.
>
> IPCC 3.5.3 SR3 seemed to be pretty stable as well...
> You could not pay me enough to support IPCCX 4.x
> yet... they are getting closer with newer releases but
> right now.. no way.. no how!
> You can also reference "golden bridge" at the link
> below.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td...tele/gblink/ipc
> mtrix.htm
>
>
> --- "Ortiz, Carlos" <CORTIZ@broward.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
__________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
| |
| Ortiz, Carlos 2006-06-26, 1:11 pm |
| Jonathan,
Following up on my question from last week about CM 4.1.3 and IPCC
versions. I saw that you have been having some problems with IPCC. When
did this start? After any of the upgrades?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonvoip@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 10:45 PM
To: Ortiz, Carlos
Cc: Ted Nugent; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Stable Call Mgr Version
Are you looking at this:
http://www.cisco.com/application/pd.../ps1846/c1225/c
cmigration_09186a00803d82f5.pdf
Cuz, I am running 4.1(3)sr3b with IPCC 3.5(2)sr3 and page 48 of that
compatibility guide shows 3.5(3)sr3 being supported in 4.1(3)sr3a (and
I have it running with 4.1(3)sr3b (which came out last week).
In fact, that shows 3.5(4) supporting CCM4.2... So, I am not sure what
you are looking at...
Jonathan
On 6/23/06, Ortiz, Carlos <CORTIZ@broward.org> wrote:
> So according to this matrix CM 4.1.3 SR1 is supported with IPC 3.5.3
but
> if you apply SR2 to CM then you have to upgrade IPCC to 4.x....does
that
> make any sense?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Nugent [mailto:tednugent69@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 10:40 AM
> To: Ortiz, Carlos; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Stable Call Mgr Version
>
> Well you're running on probably the most stable
> version of CM that 4.x has to offer... Other then that
> I would probably run with CM4.1(3)SR2... I've seen
> some issues with SR3 and thier still working them
> out... sr2b just came out the other day. I've only
> deployed Unity 4.1 a few times and each went very
> smoothly with very few followups.. (but 4.0(5) wasn't
> a bad release either... unless there are features
> you're looking for I would stick with 4.0(5))
>
> I personally would not touch CM/Unity 4.2 yet...
> they're both fairly new... I would probably give them
> a couple month.
>
> IPCC 3.5.3 SR3 seemed to be pretty stable as well...
> You could not pay me enough to support IPCCX 4.x
> yet... they are getting closer with newer releases but
> right now.. no way.. no how!
> You can also reference "golden bridge" at the link
> below.
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td...tele/gblink/ipc
> mtrix.htm
>
>
> --- "Ortiz, Carlos" <CORTIZ@broward.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
__________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
|
|
|
|
|