| Mike Armstrong 2006-07-26, 7:11 am |
| This is the route I was planning on taking; Wes's note confirms it's the
better course (than staying with 2000-4-2). Thanks to all...
mike
> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:41:46 +0800
> From: "Nathan Reeves" <nathan.a.reeves@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM OS releases
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Message-ID:
> < 62833d8a0607251741l26866408g6a1cfb6cd2a7
90df@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> The SR2 docs would say that as you would need to upgrade to the
> 2000.4.3atrain first using the upgrade installer. The release notes
> for the
> 2000.4.3a install note a minimum OS level which includes 2000.4.2
>
> Path should be 'win-OS-Upgrade-K9.2000-4-3a.exe' followed by '
> win-OS-Upgrade-K9.2000-4-3a-sr2.exe'.
>
> -Nathan
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:10:07 -0400
> From: "Jason Aarons \(US\)" <jason.aarons@us.didata.com>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM OS releases
> To: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk@cisco.com>, "Mike Armstrong" < mfa@ufl.edu>
> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Message-ID:
> < C1FE15183DA37645BC0633BC604E44F0029A0D9F
@USNAEXCH.na.didata.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Is there an upgrade path from 2000-4-2 to 2000-4-3?
>
> The OS 2000-4-3sr2 readme states do not apply this to OS 2000-4-2
> servers.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Wes Sisk
> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 7:18 PM
> To: Mike Armstrong
> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM OS releases
>
> 4.3 is going to be the primary sustained version going forward.
>
> /Wes
>
> On Jul 25, 2006, at 4:06 PM, Mike Armstrong wrote:
>
> I've been slacking off for a while, but am now getting ready to bring
> our
> VoIP system back to currency. We're now running OS 2000.4.2sr1, and it
> looks like I can either upgrade to 2000-4-2sr9, or 2000-4-3a-sr2 (via 3a
> alone). Am I missing something? Is one to be preferred over the
> other, Why
> the choice?
>
> Running on a Compaq DL-380 G2.
>
> Mike Armstrong
> UF/IFAS CREC
> Lake Alfred, FL
|