Voice over IP Cisco - Cabling Standards for IPT

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > September 2006 > Cabling Standards for IPT





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Cabling Standards for IPT
tusker keg

2006-09-07, 1:12 pm

Howdy'

Was wondering if there are any standards /BCP references out there for
a successful IPT deployment as far LAN cabling is concerned


Regards

../tusker
Wes Sisk

2006-09-07, 7:12 pm

I believe cat5e is the minimum requirement.

/Wes

tusker keg wrote:
> Howdy'
>
> Was wondering if there are any standards /BCP references out there for
> a successful IPT deployment as far LAN cabling is concerned
>
>
> Regards
>
> ./tusker
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Jason Aarons \(US\)

2006-09-07, 7:12 pm

I have a couple phones in warehouses running on Category3 at 10/Half, it
works, powered locally, it was too expensive to run a Cat5 run. Not a
good idea in my view, but hey it works.

The specs show Cat3 in Table A-1 cisco IP Phone Specifications
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products...cts_administrat
ion_guide_chapter09186a00800b607e.html#wp1003719



-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Wes Sisk
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 2:13 PM
To: tusker keg
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cabling Standards for IPT

I believe cat5e is the minimum requirement.

/Wes

tusker keg wrote:
> Howdy'
>
> Was wondering if there are any standards /BCP references out there for
> a successful IPT deployment as far LAN cabling is concerned
>
>
> Regards
>
> ./tusker
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
Lawrence E. Bakst

2006-09-10, 1:11 am

With GbE now a commodity technology I can't imagine running anything other than high quality CAT-6e cable, unless cost is major concern. If you look carefully you can even find cable that will probably work with 10 GbE over copper. Most of the new cisco p
hones run GbE. There is a significant difference in cable and jacks that meet cat5e vs cat6 when it comes to specifications. If cost is a concern I'd suggest running cat6 cable and get cat5e jacks as you can upgrade those latter with relative ease.

Best,

leb


At 2:13 PM -0400 9/7/06, Wes Sisk wrote:
>I believe cat5e is the minimum requirement.
>
>/Wes
>
>tusker keg wrote:
> ________________________________________
_______
>cisco-voip mailing list
>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Rodrigo Villagran

2006-09-12, 7:12 pm

Hi,
I've do some installations with Cat3, but as a recommendation don't use it
with a PC behind the phone, it cause some issues........bad voice quality.

Regards
Rodrigo
-----Mensaje original-----
De: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] En nombre de Jason Aarons (US)
Enviado el: jueves, 07 de septiembre de 2006 17:03
Para: ciscovoip Voip
Asunto: Re: [cisco-voip] Cabling Standards for IPT

I have a couple phones in warehouses running on Category3 at 10/Half, it
works, powered locally, it was too expensive to run a Cat5 run. Not a
good idea in my view, but hey it works.

The specs show Cat3 in Table A-1 cisco IP Phone Specifications
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products...cts_administrat
ion_guide_chapter09186a00800b607e.html#wp1003719



-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Wes Sisk
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 2:13 PM
To: tusker keg
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cabling Standards for IPT

I believe cat5e is the minimum requirement.

/Wes

tusker keg wrote:
> Howdy'
>
> Was wondering if there are any standards /BCP references out there for
> a successful IPT deployment as far LAN cabling is concerned
>
>
> Regards
>
> ./tusker
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.


________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com