| Lelio Fulgenzi 2006-09-11, 1:11 pm |
| Thanks. I should have said that I am reading through that as we speak and was looking for anything that might not be included there.
I could have sworn there was a command line utility that you can run on the router that sends data back and forth to a stub on another router and it tells you if it passes voice quality link testing or something like that. I've never seen that in the SRND.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"I can eat fifty eggs." "Nobody can eat fifty eggs."
----- Original Message -----
From: John Neiberger
To: Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] requirements for WAN link with centralized deployment
Look in the cisco IP Telephony Solution Reference Network Design
(SRND). It's in the section called "Clustering over the WAN". That's
probably a very good document for you to read through prior to making
any decisions.
On 9/11/06, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio@uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>
>
> Do you know if this is written down anywhere? We are writing up specs for
> our remote sites and I'd like to include a reference where possible.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "I can eat fifty eggs." "Nobody can eat fifty eggs."
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Neiberger
> To: Lelio Fulgenzi
> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 11:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] requirements for WAN link with centralized
> deployment
>
> want
>
> The phones aren't a big deal. As long as your one-way delay isn't over
> 150 ms or so, you should be fine. As I recall, the maximum
> *round-trip* delay over a WAN for a subscriber is 40 ms, which is
> pretty stringent.
>
> John
>
|