| Ryan Ratliff 2007-01-04, 1:11 pm |
| My guess is it's more of a limitation of the power supply we can fit
in a 1-U box. There was a good bit of discussion about this at
CIPTUG wrt to VG248s, etc.
-Ryan
On Jan 4, 2007, at 11:03 AM, Voll, Scott wrote:
I do not believe there is. cisco Partner suggested just buying 24 port
switches as you can fully populate these. cisco SE agreed.
<rant>
I told them they must be smoken' something. What is cisco thinking?
CISCO = BEST IPT.... but we don't build a switch to support it.
</rant>
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Robert
Kulagowski
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 6:49 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] "Small" switches that can provide 48 ports of
802.11afat full power?
So we've got 3750's in our environment, but we can't have all of our
7970's running at 10.2W because that's more than the switch will provide
(it only has 370W available), doing the math, that's only 35 phones.
Without trolling through all of Cisco's marketing, are there any 48 port
switches that will provide the 500W required to run all of the phones at
full brightness at the same time? We're not looking to get 6500's or
other monster chassis switches since that's overkill for our
environment.
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
|