Voice over IP Cisco - Re: Does 12.4(11)T now do H.323 to H.320

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > January 2007 > Re: Does 12.4(11)T now do H.323 to H.320





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Does 12.4(11)T now do H.323 to H.320
Robert Kulagowski

2007-01-22, 1:11 pm

> Your PRI provider has to accept a Bearer capability set to Data for
> video calls to work. Most of the time it is not an issue, but I did
> have to make a change request on a BellSouth line once for video to
> work.


I'll have to check with our facilities, unless there's some way for me
to figure it out on my own.

> As for the IOS feature, my understanding is the conversion feature works
> well, but the bonding of channels together is currently limited to 2
> channels (128K video calls) but will grow to support 384K calls soon.


That's what I'm working through right now. I escalated to TAC, and
they're shuffling me around to the right group apparently. I'm willing
to figure this out in the lab, but so far no one in this ML or in the
forums has said, "Yes, we're using it, and here's how."

> It is a good thing to play with and worth while to test with Polycom
> and VT Advantage endpoints. But if you need 384K for business use you
> would still need an IP/VC gateway for now.


Well, for now we'll just stick with BRI, but if we can move to a true
"integrated services" then that would be good.
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com