Voice over IP Cisco - Lack of DSP resources?

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > January 2007 > Lack of DSP resources?





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Lack of DSP resources?
Wydra, Jason

2007-01-31, 1:11 pm

If I have a PVDM2-48 and I'm setting up 2 PRIs for 24 channels, why on the second PRI when I run the pri-group timeslots command it tells me I don't have enough resources and I can only configure 24 channels?

Thanks,
Jason
Paul Choi

2007-01-31, 1:11 pm


--- "Wydra, Jason" <jason.wydra@berbee.com> wrote:

> If I have a PVDM2-48 and I'm setting up 2 PRIs for
> 24 channels, why on the second PRI when I run the
> pri-group timeslots command it tells me I don't have
> enough resources and I can only configure 24
> channels?


Pardon me for asking this, I thought you only get 23
channels per PRI (23B, 1D) unless you're using NFAS to
have one delta channel control multiple PRI lines. I'd
like to hear any clarification on this.

If you're using standard sig, you should have 46
bearer channels for voice and two delta channels, no?



________________________________________
________________________________________
____
Have a burning question?
Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know.
Matt Slaga \(US\)

2007-01-31, 7:11 pm

You may need to adjust your codec complexity.

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Wydra, Jason
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 12:26 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Lack of DSP resources?

If I have a PVDM2-48 and I'm setting up 2 PRIs for 24 channels, why on
the second PRI when I run the pri-group timeslots command it tells me I
don't have enough resources and I can only configure 24 channels?

Thanks,
Jason

________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
Craig M Staffin

2007-01-31, 7:11 pm

Paul

you are correct

T1 PRI is 23B+1D
E1 PRI is 30B+2D

T1 CAS however is 24B
E1 CAS is still 30B if I remember correctly

Craig





Paul Choi <asobihoudai@yahoo.com>
Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
01/31/2007 01:32 PM

To
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
cc

Subject
Re: [cisco-voip] Lack of DSP resources?







--- "Wydra, Jason" <jason.wydra@berbee.com> wrote:

> If I have a PVDM2-48 and I'm setting up 2 PRIs for
> 24 channels, why on the second PRI when I run the
> pri-group timeslots command it tells me I don't have
> enough resources and I can only configure 24
> channels?


Pardon me for asking this, I thought you only get 23
channels per PRI (23B, 1D) unless you're using NFAS to
have one delta channel control multiple PRI lines. I'd
like to hear any clarification on this.

If you're using standard sig, you should have 46
bearer channels for voice and two delta channels, no?



________________________________________
________________________________________
____
Have a burning question?
Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know.
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


J. Oquendo

2007-01-31, 7:11 pm

Paul Choi wrote:
>
>
> Pardon me for asking this, I thought you only get 23
> channels per PRI (23B, 1D) unless you're using NFAS to
> have one delta channel control multiple PRI lines. I'd
> like to hear any clarification on this.


Did you take note: "He's got 2 PRI's and is setting up 24 channels" or is it me who missed something here...

As for the E1 CAS ... 30 bearer channels, one CCS channel, and one framing channel.

--
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
=+=+=+=+=+
J. Oquendo
echo @infiltrated|sed 's/^/sil/g;s/$/.net/g'
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup...arch=0x1383A743

"How a man plays the game shows something of his
character - how he loses shows all" - Mr. Luckey
Wydra, Jason

2007-01-31, 7:11 pm

Sorry. That's what I meant. 23B +1D. Still not reason I can't get full capacity from a PVDM2-48 with two PRIs (that I know of).

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net on behalf of Craig M Staffin
Sent: Wed 1/31/2007 1:04 PM
To: Paul Choi
Cc: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Lack of DSP resources?



Paul

you are correct

T1 PRI is 23B+1D
E1 PRI is 30B+2D

T1 CAS however is 24B
E1 CAS is still 30B if I remember correctly

Craig





Paul Choi <asobihoudai@yahoo.com>
Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net

01/31/2007 01:32 PM

To
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
cc
Subject
Re: [cisco-voip] Lack of DSP resources?







--- "Wydra, Jason" <jason.wydra@berbee.com> wrote:

> If I have a PVDM2-48 and I'm setting up 2 PRIs for
> 24 channels, why on the second PRI when I run the
> pri-group timeslots command it tells me I don't have
> enough resources and I can only configure 24
> channels?


Pardon me for asking this, I thought you only get 23
channels per PRI (23B, 1D) unless you're using NFAS to
have one delta channel control multiple PRI lines. I'd
like to hear any clarification on this.

If you're using standard sig, you should have 46
bearer channels for voice and two delta channels, no?



________________________________________
________________________________________
____
Have a burning question?
Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know.
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Paul Choi

2007-01-31, 7:11 pm


--- "J. Oquendo" <sil@infiltrated.net> wrote:

> Paul Choi wrote:
> 23
> NFAS to
> I'd
>
> Did you take note: "He's got 2 PRI's and is setting
> up 24 channels" or is it me who missed something
> here...
>
> As for the E1 CAS ... 30 bearer channels, one CCS
> channel, and one framing channel.


My assumption was that when one purchases two PRI T1
lines from the telco, they'd use *all* of the bearer
channels. That's why I was asking.



________________________________________
________________________________________
____
The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/ar...edsearch_v2.php
Ted Nugent

2007-01-31, 7:11 pm

Make sure that a dspfarm has not been defined
accidentally. If not then please provide the pertinent
section of your config including the network clock
part/select commands.

Assuming this is an ISR?


--- "Wydra, Jason" <jason.wydra@berbee.com> wrote:

> Sorry. That's what I meant. 23B +1D. Still not
> reason I can't get full capacity from a PVDM2-48
> with two PRIs (that I know of).
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net on behalf
> of Craig M Staffin
> Sent: Wed 1/31/2007 1:04 PM
> To: Paul Choi
> Cc: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net;
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Lack of DSP resources?
>
>
>
> Paul
>
> you are correct
>
> T1 PRI is 23B+1D
> E1 PRI is 30B+2D
>
> T1 CAS however is 24B
> E1 CAS is still 30B if I remember correctly
>
> Craig
>
>
>
>
>
> Paul Choi <asobihoudai@yahoo.com>
> Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
>
> 01/31/2007 01:32 PM
>
> To
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> cc
> Subject
> Re: [cisco-voip] Lack of DSP resources?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- "Wydra, Jason" <jason.wydra@berbee.com> wrote:
>
> have
>
> Pardon me for asking this, I thought you only get 23
> channels per PRI (23B, 1D) unless you're using NFAS
> to
> have one delta channel control multiple PRI lines.
> I'd
> like to hear any clarification on this.
>
> If you're using standard sig, you should have 46
> bearer channels for voice and two delta channels,
> no?
>
>
>
>

________________________________________
________________________________________
____
> Have a burning question?
> Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from
> real people who know.
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>





________________________________________
________________________________________
____
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com