Voice over IP Cisco - 5.1 Speed Dial Presence

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > October 2007 > 5.1 Speed Dial Presence





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author 5.1 Speed Dial Presence
Jason Aarons \(US\)

2007-10-08, 7:11 pm

I think what they want is DSS/BLF, does it require a dedicated presence
server or can CCM 5.1 do this natively?

Cisco Unified CallManager Speed Dial Presence

Cisco Unified CallManager supports the ability for a speed dial to have
presence capabilities via a busy lamp field (BLF) speed dial. BLF speed
dials work as both a speed dial and a presence indicator. Only the
system administrator can configure a BLF speed dial; a system user is
not allowed to configure a BLFspeed dial.

States are:

Idle

Busy

Unknown

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products...ucts_implementa
tion_design_guide_chapter09186a008070bc0
2.html#wp1070507
<java script:newWin('http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556
/ products_implementation_design_guide_cha
pter09186a008070bc02.html#wp107
0507')>



From: Jason Aarons (US)
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 2:05 PM
To:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: 79x0 vs 79x1 (BLF?)



Customer has all SCCP 79x0s with CCM 5.1 and are asking for a button to
have "auto dial and appearance", they have been using the 7940 a week,
along with CCMUser and don't think AbbrDial/FastDials/Personal Directory
meets their needs. Their old phone had lots of buttons, etc.

What is the CallManager 5.1 feature called wherea button can be both a
Shared Line and Speed Dial? I'm trying to find the URL if it requires a
79x1 or would it work with a 7960.

What are the caveats? Can they setup/manage via CCMUser?

I've been stuck on 4.1 a long time and recall seeing something about
this in 5.x, but can't find the details. I know 4.1 you could have
either a shared line or a speed dial but not both.

-jason






-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately byreplying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
Wes Sisk

2007-10-08, 7:11 pm

________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Jason Aarons \(US\)

2007-10-08, 7:11 pm

Any benefits if they used 79x1 over 7960 for Speed Dial Presence? They
are about to order more 7960s over 7961s due to costs. I wish there was
some motivating one-reason issue to get customers to buy 79x1s. Iknow
the benefits of 79x1, and would only buy this model myself, but costs
are sometimes the winner with customers over logic. Can't we end of life
the 7960s and make the 7961 same price!



From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, October08, 2007 4:01 PM
To: Jason Aarons (US)
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 5.1 Speed Dial Presence



native. no CUPS required. /wes

Jason Aarons(US) wrote:

I think what they want is DSS/BLF, does it requirea dedicated presence
server or can CCM 5.1 do this natively?

Cisco Unified CallManager Speed Dial Presence

Cisco Unified CallManager supports the ability for a speed dial to have
presence capabilities via a busy lamp field (BLF) speed dial. BLF speed
dialswork as both a speed dial and a presence indicator. Only the
systemadministrator can configure a BLF speed dial; a system user is
not allowed to configure a BLF speed dial.

States are:

Idle

Busy

Unknown

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products...ucts_implementa
tion_design_guide_chapter09186a008070bc0
2.html#wp1070507
<java script:newWin('http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556
/ products_implementation_design_guide_cha
pter09186a008070bc02.html#wp107
0507')>



From: Jason Aarons (US)
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 2:05 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: 79x0 vs 79x1 (BLF?)



Customer has all SCCP 79x0s with CCM5.1 and are asking for a button to
have "auto dial and appearance",they have been using the 7940 a week,
along with CCMUser and don't think AbbrDial/FastDials/Personal Directory
meets their needs. Their old phone had lots of buttons, etc.

What is the CallManager 5.1 feature called where a button can be both a
Shared Line and SpeedDial? I'm trying to find the URL if it requires a
79x1 or would it work with a 7960.

What are the caveats? Can they setup/manage via CCMUser?

I've been stuck on 4.1 a long time and recall seeing something about
this in 5.x, but can't find the details. I know 4.1 you could have
either a shared line or a speed dial but not both.

-jason



________________________________

Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you are hereby notified that you have received thiscommunication in
error and that any use or reproduction of this emailor its contents is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.




________________________________




________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
Justin Steinberg

2007-10-08, 7:11 pm

i would highly recommend the 79x1 if they are complaining about the
lack of BLF status. The 79x1 light up the line button with BLF info.
The 79x0 dont.

If they really miss their buttons they can use the 7931 phone with
CM6. I haven't used this phone yet but i think the price is much less
than the 7961.

On 10/8/07, Jason Aarons (US) <jason.aarons@us.didata.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Any benefits if they used 79x1 over 7960 for Speed Dial Presence? They are
> about to order more 7960s over 7961s due to costs. I wish there was some
> motivating one-reason issue to get customers to buy 79x1s. I know the
> benefits of 79x1, and would only buy this model myself, but costs are
> sometimes the winner with customers over logic. Can't we end of life the
> 7960s and make the 7961 same price!
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk@cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 4:01 PM
> To: Jason Aarons (US)
> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 5.1 Speed Dial Presence
>
>
>
>
> native. no CUPS required. /wes
>
> Jason Aarons (US) wrote:
>
> I think what they want is DSS/BLF, does it require a dedicated presence
> server or can CCM 5.1 do this natively?
>
> cisco Unified CallManager Speed Dial Presence
>
> cisco Unified CallManager supports the ability for a speed dial to have
> presence capabilities via a busy lamp field (BLF) speed dial. BLF speed
> dials work as both a speed dial and a presence indicator. Only the system
> administrator can configure a BLF speed dial; a system user is not allowed
> to configure a BLF speed dial.
>
> States are:
>
> Idle
>
> Busy
>
> Unknown
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products....html#wp1070507
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Jason Aarons (US)
> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 2:05 PM
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: 79x0 vs 79x1 (BLF?)
>
>
>
> Customer has all SCCP 79x0s with CCM 5.1 and are asking for a button to have
> "auto dial and appearance", they have been using the 7940 a week, along with
> CCMUser and don't think AbbrDial/FastDials/Personal Directory meets their
> needs. Their old phone had lots of buttons, etc.
>
> What is the CallManager 5.1 feature called where a button can be both a
> Shared Line and Speed Dial? I'm trying to find the URL if it requires a
> 79x1 or would it work with a 7960.
>
> What are the caveats? Can they setup/manage via CCMUser?
>
> I've been stuck on 4.1 a long time and recall seeing something about this in
> 5.x, but can't find the details. I know 4.1 you could have either a shared
> line or a speed dial but not both.
>
> -jason
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you.
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck..nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
>
> Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you.
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

Wes Sisk

2007-10-08, 7:11 pm

________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Nick Kassel

2007-10-09, 7:11 am

Wes

Does that include no more development for 7970



________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Wes Sisk
Sent: 08 October 2007 22:24
To: Jason Aarons (US)
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 5.1 Speed Dial Presence



x1 allows you to see BLF status of calling party in
missed/placed/received directories. Personally, thisis one of my
favorite features.

x1 - will be around much longer and get new features including midlets.
x0 - no more feature development.

/Wes

Jason Aarons (US) wrote:

Any benefits if they used 79x1 over 7960 for Speed Dial Presence? They
are about to order more 7960s over 7961s due to costs. I wish there was
some motivating one-reason issue to get customers to buy 79x1s. I know
the benefits of 79x1, and would only buy this model myself, but costs
are sometimes the winner with customers over logic. Can't we end of life
the 7960s and make the 7961 same price!



From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 4:01 PM
To: Jason Aarons (US)
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 5.1 Speed Dial Presence



native. no CUPS required. /wes

Jason Aarons (US) wrote:

I think what they want is DSS/BLF, does it require a dedicated presence
server or can CCM 5.1 do this natively?

Cisco Unified CallManager Speed Dial Presence

Cisco Unified CallManager supports the ability for a speed dial to have
presence capabilities via a busy lamp field (BLF) speed dial. BLF speed
dials work as both a speed dial and a presence indicator. Only the
system administrator can configure a BLF speed dial; a system user is
not allowed to configure a BLF speed dial.

States are:

Idle

Busy

Unknown

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products...ucts_implementa
tion_design_guide_chapter09186a008070bc0
2.html#wp1070507



From: Jason Aarons (US)
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 2:05 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: 79x0 vs 79x1 (BLF?)



Customer has all SCCP 79x0s with CCM 5.1 and are asking for a button to
have "auto dial and appearance", they have been using the 7940 a week,
along with CCMUser and don't think AbbrDial/FastDials/Personal Directory
meets their needs. Their old phone had lots of buttons, etc.

What is the CallManager 5.1 feature called where a button can be both a
Shared Line and Speed Dial? I'm trying to find the URL if it requires a
79x1 or would it work with a 7960.

What are the caveats? Can they setup/manage via CCMUser?

I've been stuck on 4.1 a long timeand recall seeing something about
this in 5.x, but can't find the details. I know 4.1 you could have
either a shared line or a speed dial but not both.

-jason



________________________________

Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Ifyou have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer.Thank you.







________________________________









________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck..nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>
________________________________


Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.

********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT***********************************
***************

The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all of which may be legally privileged.
Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying to or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the sender immediately should this e-mail have been
incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any attachment sent with it from your computer.

You are advised thaturgent, time sensitive and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
accept that any instructions are deemed to have beengiven at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and that
deliveryreceipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).

You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails sent and
received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
****************************************
****************************************
***********************


Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR

Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304

Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd

Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
International Capital Market Association and The London International Financial Futures & Options Exchange.

This footnote also confirms thatthis email message has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
Filter software.

Jason Aarons \(US\)

2007-10-09, 1:11 pm

I setup this DSS/BLF (Speed Dial Presence), she is the receptionist for
a manager, now when you call the manager her phone doesn't ring like a
shared line did.

Should it? I don't see a ring/flash/disable setting for this.



From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 5:24 PM
To: JasonAarons (US)
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 5.1 Speed Dial Presence



x1 allows you tosee BLF status of calling party in
missed/placed/received directories. Personally, this is one of my
favorite features.

x1 - will be around much longer and get new features including midlets.
x0 - no more feature development.

/Wes

Jason Aarons (US) wrote:

Any benefits if they used 79x1 over 7960 for Speed Dial Presence? They
are about to order more 7960s over 7961s due to costs. I wish there was
some motivating one-reason issue to get customers to buy 79x1s. I know
the benefits of 79x1, and would only buy this model myself, but costs
are sometimes the winner with customers over logic. Can't we end of life
the 7960s and make the 7961 same price!



From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 4:01 PM
To: Jason Aarons (US)
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 5.1 Speed Dial Presence



native. no CUPS required. /wes

Jason Aarons (US) wrote:

I think what they wantis DSS/BLF, does it require a dedicated presence
server or can CCM 5.1 do this natively?

Cisco Unified CallManager Speed Dial Presence

Cisco Unified CallManager supports the ability for a speeddial to have
presence capabilities via a busy lamp field (BLF) speed dial. BLF speed
dials work as both a speed dial and a presence indicator. Only the
system administrator can configure a BLF speed dial; a system user is
not allowed to configure a BLF speed dial.

States are:

Idle

Busy

Unknown

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products...ucts_implementa
tion_design_guide_chapter09186a008070bc0
2.html#wp1070507
<java script:newWin('http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556
/ products_implementation_design_guide_cha
pter09186a008070bc02.html#wp107
0507')>



From: Jason Aarons (US)
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 2:05 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: 79x0 vs 79x1 (BLF?)



Customer has all SCCP 79x0s with CCM 5.1 and are asking for a button to
have "auto dial and appearance", they have been using the 7940 a week,
along with CCMUser and don't think AbbrDial/FastDials/Personal Directory
meets their needs. Their old phone had lots of buttons, etc.

What is the CallManager 5.1 feature called where a button can be both a
Shared Line and Speed Dial? I'm trying to find the URL if it requires a
79x1 or would it work with a 7960.

What are the caveats? Can they setup/manage via CCMUser?

I've been stuck on 4.1 a long time and recall seeing something about
this in 5.x, but can't find the details. I know 4.1 you could have
either a sharedline or a speed dial but not both.

-jason



________________________________

Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
strictly prohibitedand may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.





________________________________







________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck..nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>
________________________________


Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachmentsmay contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use bythe designated
addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediatelyby replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.




-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
Wes Sisk

2007-10-09, 7:12 pm

________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Wes Sisk

2007-10-09, 7:12 pm

________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Erik Erasmus (E)

2007-10-10, 1:11 pm


I also read somewhere that the x0 versions does not support the
intercom functionality like whisper but the x1 like 7941 / 7961 does
.... in ccm 6



________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Wes Sisk
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 11:24 PM
To: Jason Aarons (US)
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 5.1 Speed Dial Presence



x1 allows you to see BLF status of calling party in
missed/placed/received directories. Personally, this is one of my
favorite features.

x1 - will be around much longer and get new features including
midlets.
x0 - no more feature development.

/Wes

Jason Aarons (US) wrote:

Any benefits if they used 79x1 over 7960 for Speed Dial Presence? They
are about to order more 7960s over 7961s due to costs. I wish there
was some motivating one-reason issue to get customers to buy 79x1s. I
know the benefits of 79x1, and would only buy this model myself, but
costs are sometimes the winner with customers over logic. Can't we end
of life the 7960s and make the 7961 same price!



From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 4:01 PM
To: Jason Aarons (US)
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 5.1 Speed Dial Presence



native. no CUPS required. /wes

Jason Aarons (US) wrote:

I think what they want is DSS/BLF, does it require a dedicated
presence server or can CCM 5.1 do this natively?

Cisco Unified CallManager Speed Dial Presence

Cisco Unified CallManager supports the ability for a speed dial to
have presence capabilities via a busy lamp field (BLF) speed dial. BLF
speed dials work as both a speed dial and a presence indicator. Only
the system administrator can configure a BLF speed dial; a system user
is not allowed to configure a BLF speed dial.

States are:

Idle

Busy

Unknown

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products...oducts_implemen
tation_design_guide_chapter09186a008070b
c02.html#wp1070507
<java script:newWin('http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps5
56/ products_implementation_design_guide_cha
pter09186a008070bc02.html#w
p1070507')>



From: Jason Aarons (US)
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 2:05 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: 79x0 vs 79x1 (BLF?)



Customer has all SCCP 79x0s with CCM 5.1 and are asking for a button
to have "auto dial and appearance", they have been using the 7940 a
week, along with CCMUser and don't think AbbrDial/FastDials/Personal
Directory meets their needs. Their old phone had lots of buttons, etc.

What is the CallManager 5.1 feature called where a button can be both
a Shared Line and Speed Dial? I'm trying to find the URL if it
requires a 79x1 or would it work with a 7960.

What are the caveats? Can they setup/manage via CCMUser?

I've been stuck on 4.1 a long time and recall seeing something about
this in 5.x, but can't find the details. I know 4.1 you could have
either a shared line or a speed dial but not both.

-jason



________________________________

Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended
addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this
communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email
or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your
computer. Thank you.






________________________________







________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck..nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>
________________________________


Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended
addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this
communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email
or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your
computer. Thank you.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This e-mail is subject to the Telkom SA electronic communication legalnotice, available at :
http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com