Voice over IP Cisco - Re: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 56, Issue 43

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > October 2007 > Re: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 56, Issue 43





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 56, Issue 43
R, Sajish

2007-10-16, 7:11 am

Hi,

How to upgrade firmware for 7960 phone??/

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 1:40 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 56, Issue 43

Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
cisco-voip-owner@puck.nether.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. 5.1 Speed Dial Presence (Jason Aarons (US))
2. Re: 5.1 Speed Dial Presence (Wes Sisk)
3. Re: 5.1 Speed Dial Presence (Jason Aarons (US))


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 15:53:55 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons \(US\)" <jason.aarons@us.didata.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] 5.1 Speed Dial Presence
To: <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:

< C1FE15183DA37645BC0633BC604E44F00707EA18
@USNAEXCH.na.didata.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I think what they want is DSS/BLF, does it require a dedicated presence
server or can CCM 5.1 do this natively?

Cisco Unified CallManager Speed Dial Presence

Cisco Unified CallManager supports the ability for a speed dial to have
presence capabilities via a busy lamp field (BLF) speed dial. BLF speed
dials work as both a speed dial and a presence indicator. Only the
system administrator can configure a BLF speed dial; a system user is
not allowed to configure a BLF speed dial.

States are:

Idle

Busy

Unknown

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products...ucts_implementa
tion_design_guide_chapter09186a008070bc0
2.html#wp1070507
<java script:newWin('http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556
/ products_implementation_design_guide_cha
pter09186a008070bc02.html#wp107
0507')>



From: Jason Aarons (US)
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 2:05 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: 79x0 vs 79x1 (BLF?)



Customer has all SCCP 79x0s with CCM 5.1 and are asking for a button to
have "auto dial and appearance", they have been using the 7940 a week,
along with CCMUser and don't think AbbrDial/FastDials/Personal Directory
meets their needs. Their old phone had lots of buttons, etc.

What is the CallManager 5.1 feature called where a button can be both a
Shared Line and Speed Dial? I'm trying to find the URL if it requires a
79x1 or would it work with a 7960.

What are the caveats? Can they setup/manage via CCMUser?

I've been stuck on 4.1 a long time and recall seeing something about
this in 5.x, but can't find the details. I know 4.1 you could have
either a shared line or a speed dial but not both.

-jason






-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c...20071008/44781b
b6/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:01:12 -0400
From: Wes Sisk <wsisk@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 5.1 Speed Dial Presence
To: "Jason Aarons (US)" <jason.aarons@us.didata.com>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <470A8C88.30703@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c...20071008/98c4b7
aa/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:08:57 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons \(US\)" <jason.aarons@us.didata.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 5.1 Speed Dial Presence
To: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk@cisco.com>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Message-ID:

< C1FE15183DA37645BC0633BC604E44F00707EA77
@USNAEXCH.na.didata.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Any benefits if they used 79x1 over 7960 for Speed Dial Presence? They
are about to order more 7960s over 7961s due to costs. I wish there was
some motivating one-reason issue to get customers to buy 79x1s. I know
the benefits of 79x1, and would only buy this model myself, but costs
are sometimes the winner with customers over logic. Can't we end of life
the 7960s and make the 7961 same price!



From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 4:01 PM
To: Jason Aarons (US)
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 5.1 Speed Dial Presence



native. no CUPS required. /wes

Jason Aarons (US) wrote:

I think what they want is DSS/BLF, does it require a dedicated presence
server or can CCM 5.1 do this natively?

Cisco Unified CallManager Speed Dial Presence

Cisco Unified CallManager supports the ability for a speed dial to have
presence capabilities via a busy lamp field (BLF) speed dial. BLF speed
dials work as both a speed dial and a presence indicator. Only the
system administrator can configure a BLF speed dial; a system user is
not allowed to configure a BLF speed dial.

States are:

Idle

Busy

Unknown

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products...ucts_implementa
tion_design_guide_chapter09186a008070bc0
2.html#wp1070507
<java script:newWin('http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556
/ products_implementation_design_guide_cha
pter09186a008070bc02.html#wp107
0507')>



From: Jason Aarons (US)
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 2:05 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: 79x0 vs 79x1 (BLF?)



Customer has all SCCP 79x0s with CCM 5.1 and are asking for a button to
have "auto dial and appearance", they have been using the 7940 a week,
along with CCMUser and don't think AbbrDial/FastDials/Personal Directory
meets their needs. Their old phone had lots of buttons, etc.

What is the CallManager 5.1 feature called where a button can be both a
Shared Line and Speed Dial? I'm trying to find the URL if it requires a
79x1 or would it work with a 7960.

What are the caveats? Can they setup/manage via CCMUser?

I've been stuck on 4.1 a long time and recall seeing something about
this in 5.x, but can't find the details. I know 4.1 you could have
either a shared line or a speed dial but not both.

-jason



________________________________

Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.




________________________________




________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c...20071008/068d1a
0a/attachment.html

------------------------------

________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 56, Issue 43
****************************************
**
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com