| Jason Aarons \(US\) 2007-11-03, 1:11 pm |
| I use Skype which uses iLBC (Internet Low Bandwidth Codec), I suspect
the 79xx phones will eventually get it?
It's amazing how a Skype calls sounds great, yet a IP Communicator call
has issues. From my research it's the iLBC tolerates packet loss better.
Typically I'm in a hotel and will use Skype over IP Communicator for
calls.
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Miller, Steve
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 2:55 AM
To: Carter, Bill;Robert Kulagowski; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871
route+7970 r vs. cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator
What is the latest IP Communicator version? Has anything changed in the
past 15 months? Thanks.
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net on behalf of Carter, Bill
Sent: Fri 11/2/2007 11:06 PM
To: Robert Kulagowski; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871
route+7970 r vs. cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator
The latest version of IP communicator really improves call quality.
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Robert
Kulagowski
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 3:54 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CiscoUnified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871 route+7970 r
vs. cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator
Any thoughts on the relative merits of the above combinations? We
currently deploy the VPN client + IP Communicator for home users, but
there are complaints of call quality issues (we use CM 4.1.3sr5 and
g.729). Since we can't switch to iLBC we'relooking at alternatives.
From what I can gather, the PhoneProxy would still encrypt all traffic
over the Internet (control and voice), correct?
Is it any more "efficient", packet-wise or whatever, than a full-blown
VPN tunnel configuration that you'd get with a 871?
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
--------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail message and any attached files are confidential
and are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s)
named above. This communication may contain material
protected by attorney-client, work product, or other
privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person
responsible for delivering this confidential communication
tothe intended recipient, you have received this
communication in error, and any review, use, dissemination,
forwarding, printing, copying,or other distribution of
this e-mail message and any attached files is strictly
prohibited. Dickstein Shapiro reserves the right to monitor
any communication that is created, received, or sent on its
network. If you have received this confidential
communication in error, please notify the sender
immediately by reply e-mail messageand permanently delete
the original message.
To replyto our email administrator directly, send an email
to postmaster@dicksteinshapiro.com
Dickstein Shapiro LLP
http://www.DicksteinShapiro.com
========================================
================================
======
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notifiedthat you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
fromyour computer. Thank you.
|