| Jason Aarons \(US\) 2007-11-04, 1:12 am |
| Skype is a pay-per minute service unrelated to Cisco, typically a penny
a minute in US and great international rates. Similar to MSN Messenger
Calling, Yahoo Messenger Phone Out, etc.
My comment was more about how great the iLBC is, and can cisco add it to
all products, royalty is usually a issue as with g729.
-----Original Message-----
From: Manoj Kalpage [mailto:manoj.kalpage@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 8:29 PM
To: Jason Aarons (US)
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IP Communicator or 79xx get iLBC ?
Jason, how you do this? Are there any special settings needs to be
done on CCM for this?
Thanks
On 11/4/07, Jason Aarons (US) <jason.aarons@us.didata.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I use Skype which uses iLBC (Internet Low Bandwidth Codec), I suspect
the
> 79xx phones will eventually get it?
>
>
>
> It's amazing how a Skype calls sounds great, yet a IP Communicator
call has
> issues. From my research it's the iLBC tolerates packet loss better.
> Typically I'm in a hotel and will use Skype over IP Communicator for
calls.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Miller, Steve
> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 2:55 AM
> To: Carter, Bill; Robert Kulagowski; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871
route+7970
> r vs. cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator
>
>
>
>
>
> What is the latest IP Communicator version? Has anything changed in
the
> past 15 months? Thanks.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net on behalf of
> Carter, Bill
> Sent: Fri 11/2/2007 11:06 PM
> To: Robert Kulagowski; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871
route+7970
> r vs. cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator
>
>
> The latest version of IP communicator really improves call quality.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Robert
> Kulagowski
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 3:54 PM
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] cisco Unified PhoneProxy+7970 vs. 871
route+7970 r
> vs. cisco VPN Client+IP Communicator
>
> Any thoughts on the relative merits of the above combinations? We
> currently deploy the VPN client + IP Communicator for home users, but
> there are complaints of call quality issues (we use CM 4.1.3sr5 and
> g.729). Since we can't switch to iLBC we're looking at alternatives.
>
> From what I can gather, the PhoneProxy would still encrypt all
traffic
> over the Internet (control and voice), correct?
>
> Is it any more "efficient", packet-wise or whatever, than a
full-blown
> VPN tunnel configuration that you'd get with a 871?
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck..nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck..nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> --------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail message and any attached files are confidential
> and are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s)
> named above. This communication may contain material
> protected by attorney-client, work product, or other
> privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person
> responsible for delivering this confidential communication
> to the intended recipient, you have received this
> communication in error, and any review, use, dissemination,
> forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of
> this e-mail message and any attached files is strictly
> prohibited. Dickstein Shapiro reserves the right to monitor
> any communication that is created, received, or sent on its
> network. If you have received this confidential
> communication in error, please notify the sender
> immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete
> the original message.
>
> To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email
> to postmaster@dicksteinshapiro.com
>
> Dickstein Shapiro LLP
> http://www.DicksteinShapiro.com
>
>
========================================
================================
======
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
>
> Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error
and
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and
deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you.
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
|