Voice over IP Cisco - Re: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 58, Issue 110

Author

Re: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 58, Issue 110

Stephen, Alicia

2007-12-18, 1:12 pm

Sales Engineer III in Seattle, Washington!!!!!

Provide presale technical support to Premier customers. Develop
achievable presale plan for assigned accounts in accordance with
business unit sales goals. Identify opportunities for more effective
technical support to the sales team. Work with the account teams to
develop and recommend VzB services to meet the customer's business
requirements and as necessary. Responsibilities include technical
presentations, network design, proposal writing and client technical
service management. SE will work with internal engineering, support,
product, service center and IT groups to develop and implement solutions
for assigned base. Requires an in-depth working knowledge across
multiple technical disciplines including IT/Data/Voice/Video
applications, convergence technologies, IP-based technologies and
Security strategies.

Requirements A high-energy individual with a positive attitude, good
teamwork skills and customer presentation experience is required. 7+
years in the telecommunications, information technology, and/or systems
integration industries. 5+ years previous sales engineering or technical
sales consultant. BS/MS in Electrical Engineering, Computer Science,
Telecommunications, or related degree. Cisco, Nortel, Microsoft,
Checkpoint, CISSP Security certifications a plus. Demonstrated expertise
in security, managed services, convergence solutions (VoIP), integrated
solutions, hosting, IP-VPN, IPT, LAN/WAN internetworking, and Voice &
Data services. Candidate must have excellent interpersonal and
presentation skills.

If you are interested please contact Alicia.stephen@verizonbusiness.com

Thanks-

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 1:33 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 58, Issue 110

Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
cisco-voip-owner@puck.nether.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."

Today's Topics:

1. Re: Anyone try the CID on H323? (Scott Voll)
2. Re: A bug? Random authentication errors when logging into EM.
CUCMBE 6.0(1) (Jason Wydra)
3. [MailServer Notification]Security Notification
(jsenger@netlogic-inc.com)
4. Re: 91 possibly calling 911? (Leetun, Rob)
5. VM notification to multiple destinations (James Grace)
6. Re: 91 possibly calling 911? (Craig Staffin)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:02:10 -0800
From: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Anyone try the CID on H323?
To: CarlosOrtiz@bayviewfinancial.com
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Message-ID:
< f84a38d30712180902s293da008u111bf7da95c3
a92d@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Any idea when it will be available for the CMM blade?

Scott

On Dec 18, 2007 7:37 AM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip@gmail.com> wrote:

> Cool.
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Dec 18, 2007 8:07 AM, <CarlosOrtiz@bayviewfinancial.com> wrote:
> 3845
[vbcol=seagreen]
> gateway
> person
phone.[vbcol=seagreen]
your results.[vbcol=seagreen]
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products..._note09186a0080
> 837f1a.html#wp329995
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c...20071218/ad8ed9
72/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:11:35 -0600
From: "Jason Wydra" <jasonwydra@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] A bug? Random authentication errors when
logging into EM. CUCMBE 6.0(1)
To: "Ryan Ratliff" <rratliff@cisco.com>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Message-ID:
< 4d6a41c70712180911i7d0103edke54aaf6db2d6
2df8@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Ryan - Thanks. No, the password is not aging out and the account is not
set for "user must change at next login". I should add that the system
is 2 months old. They have about 40 EM users. They can login/logout with
no issues. Then one day somebody would complain that they can't login
anymore.
Then I need to reset the pin. It usually happens in the middle of the
day when the user goes out to lunch. They log out, then when they get
back and try to log back in they get the error.

On 12/18/07, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Is their password or pin aging out or is the credential policy set to
> "user must change at next login"? I've seen an issue like this
> discussed internally and a bug has either been filed or will be filed.
>
> I'd definitely recommend opening a TAC SR. CSCsl76193 may be
related.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:41 PM, Jason Wydra wrote:
>
> CUCMBE 6.0(1) ES 2111
>
> Hello. I did a bug scrub but couldn't find anything. I'm ready to open

> a TAC case.
>
> Random users complain at least once or twice a week that they cannot
> login to their extension mobility profile. They get an error on the
> phone stating "authentication error" after they enter their pin and
> password. The only fix is to login to the end user config and reset
> their pin. I'm curious if anyone else has seen this?
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c...20071218/58d96d
15/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:59:18 -0800
From: <jsenger@netlogic-inc.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] [MailServer Notification]Security Notification
To: <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <6D651B97377F4955920229904C4A1E0D@nlsys.biz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

WORM_MYDOOM.GEN has been detected,and Replace has been taken on
12/18/2007 8:59:00 AM.

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:51:53 -0700
From: "Leetun, Rob" <rleetun@co.boulder.co.us>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 91 possibly calling 911?
To: "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip@gmail.com>, "Scott Voll"
<svoll.voip@gmail.com>
Cc: ciscovoip <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:

< 963CE94787005149A52C17F33A028E120A320BD4
@EVS1B.boco.co.boulder.co.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

How about changing the route pattern to 911? and 9.911?; then this would
give the caller enough time to hang up the phone based on the t.302
timer?

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Charles
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 3:07 PM
To: Scott Voll
Cc: ciscovoip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 91 possibly calling 911?

Change your access code to 8...

We recommend it, but mostly because CM routes calls so much faster than
older PBXs do...

J

On Dec 16, 2007 4:04 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com> wrote:
> only asking because the last PBX did that so people are blaming the
> accidental 911 calls on the CM now.
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> On Dec 14, 2007 3:47 PM, Wes Sisk <wsisk@cisco.com> wrote:
>
you[vbcol=seagreen]
> could timeout and match the pattern would be pattern 91? as ? matches
zero
> or more chars.
auto[vbcol=seagreen]
> dial 911? I think I might have 911 set to emergency priority or what
every
> it's called.
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:29:26 -0500
From: "James Grace" <grace.jd@gmail.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] VM notification to multiple destinations
To: CiscosupportUpuck <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
< 449cb1210712181029u65de3fc8ja4c23d38a783
844c@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Trying to find out if Unity 5.0 supports VM notification to multiple
devices. In unity 4X you can send VM notification to one phone and if
unsuccessful send it to another phone. But we are running into the fact
that the first notification is going into the remote phone vm. The
problem with this is that it's consider to be a successful notification
and will not roll to the second person/phone

--
James Grace
CCVP CCNP CCNA MCSE MCDBA
System Engineer / Consultant
Email: grace.jd@gmail.com

MSN IM: grace.jd@gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c...20071218/9d0852
cd/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:32:53 -0600
From: "Craig Staffin" <cmstaffin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 91 possibly calling 911?
To: "Leetun, Rob" <rleetun@co.boulder.co.us>
Cc: ciscovoip <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
< 9b76d88c0712181032q5df303bel5066231c9c4f
2891@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

hey Rob thats an interesting concept

Thanks

On Dec 18, 2007 11:51 AM, Leetun, Rob <rleetun@co.boulder.co.us> wrote:

>
> How about changing the route pattern to 911? and 9.911?; then this
> would give the caller enough time to hang up the phone based on the
> t.302 timer?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan
> Charles
> Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 3:07 PM
> To: Scott Voll
> Cc: ciscovoip
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 91 possibly calling 911?
>
> Change your access code to 8...
>
> We recommend it, but mostly because CM routes calls so much faster
> than older PBXs do...
>
>
>
> J
>
> On Dec 16, 2007 4:04 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com> wrote:
> you
> zero
> auto
> every
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

--
Craig Staffin
Craig@staffin.org
(H) 262-437-7313
(C) 262-613-6003
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c...20071218/073958
42/attachment.html

------------------------------

________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 58, Issue 110
****************************************
***