Voice over IP Cisco - dial-peers and more specific vs less specific matching

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > February 2007 > dial-peers and more specific vs less specific matching





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author dial-peers and more specific vs less specific matching
Lelio Fulgenzi

2007-02-09, 7:11 pm

Trying to get my head around these dial-peers, and just when I thought I knew what I was doing....

I created a few dial-peers, some more specific than others, in the hopes that I could selectively route calls based on the CoR list assigned. We do something similar in CallManager and I was hoping to emulate things as much as possible.

A simple example (pardon spelling errors):

dial-peer cor custom
name long_dist
name toll_fraud

dial-peer cor list call_long_dist
member long_dist

dial-peer cor list call_toll_fraud
member long_dist
member toll_fraud

dial-peer voice 91901 pots
corlist outgoing call_long_dist
destination-pattern 91..........
port 3/0:23
forward-digits 11

dial-peer voice 976001901 pots
corlist outgoing call_toll_fraud
huntstop
destination-pattern 919005655555
port 3/0:23
forward-digits 11

phones with an incoming dialpeer of call_long_dist can still call this 1900 number, because it's matching the 91.......... dial-peer.

is that the way things are supposed to work? even if there is a more specific dial-peer (that doesn't match it's cor list), it will use a less specific dial-peer that does match?

that seems odd to me.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
....there's no such thing as a bad timbit...

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com