|
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > February 2007 > Fax servers
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| Voll, Scott 2007-02-19, 1:11 pm |
| Sorry to add another Fax tread to the currently over used topic as of
recent but I've been asked about fax servers.
What is the best out there?
I currently have CM 4.1.3sr2 and will be going to CM 5.1 in the near
future. I'm currently running MGCP on a CMM blade with multiple PRI's,
but also have remote sites via WAN that also need G711 Faxing. We
currently have Unity UM back ended with Exchange 2003 / AD 2003. but
will be upgrading to Unity 5.x for some of the new features very soon
after it comes out this spring.
We want to be able to fax from the PC's and receive faxes in our email.
What would be the best option?
I seen Jason said something about XMedius but he was only using it
inbound.
Thanks for all input.
Scott
| |
| Robert Kulagowski 2007-02-19, 1:11 pm |
| > We want to be able to fax from the PC=92s and receive faxes in our email.
> What would be the best option?
How about this? =
http://www.ciscounitytools.com/App_...ationWizard.htm
It may not be robust enough for what you want to do, and there's lots of =
caveats, but I think I remember Jeff Lindborg (aka, "Mr. Unity") saying =
in the cisco forums that a lot of those were CYAs.
| |
| Voll, Scott 2007-02-19, 1:11 pm |
| I was just looking at this.... and it's for VM only installs. Which
doesn't make a lot of sense. But that's what it said.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Kulagowski [mailto:bob@smalltime.com]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:21 AM
To: Voll, Scott
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax servers
> We want to be able to fax from the PC's and receive faxes in our
email.
> What would be the best option?
How about this?
http://www.ciscounitytools.com/App_...ationWizard.htm
It may not be robust enough for what you want to do, and there's lots of
caveats, but I think I remember Jeff Lindborg (aka, "Mr. Unity") saying
in the cisco forums that a lot of those were CYAs.
| |
| CarlosOrtiz@bayviewfinancial.com 2007-02-19, 1:11 pm |
| I did a trial run with Xmedius about 1 year ago. I believe you can use it
for inbound and outbound as you described. The real plus with Xmedius is
that it is a software only solution that uses your H.323 gateways for
faxing. I'm not sure if anything has changed but at the time they did not
support MGCP. Unfortunately all our gateways were MGCP at the time.
Looked liked a good product with very fair pricing. I think they price
per B-channel used on a PRI.
Carlos
"Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll@wesd.org>
Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
02/19/2007 01:37 PM
To
"Robert Kulagowski" <bob@smalltime.com>
cc
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject
Re: [cisco-voip] Fax servers
I was just looking at this.... and it's for VM only installs. Which
doesn't make a lot of sense. But that's what it said.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Kulagowski [mailto:bob@smalltime.com]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:21 AM
To: Voll, Scott
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax servers
> We want to be able to fax from the PC's and receive faxes in our
email.
> What would be the best option?
How about this?
http://www.ciscounitytools.com/App_...ationWizard.htm
It may not be robust enough for what you want to do, and there's lots of
caveats, but I think I remember Jeff Lindborg (aka, "Mr. Unity") saying
in the cisco forums that a lot of those were CYAs.
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
| |
| Jason Aarons \(US\) 2007-02-19, 7:11 pm |
| I think you'll find a lot of issues with MGCP, for example CVP, VXML,
Mobility Manager all require H323. While MGCP is simple to configure,
the features seem to be developed around H323.
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
CarlosOrtiz@bayviewfinancial.com
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 1:56 PM
To: Voll, Scott
Cc: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax servers
Idid a trial run with Xmedius about 1 year ago. I believe you can use
it for inbound and outbound as you described. The real plus with
Xmedius is that it is a software only solution that uses your H.323
gateways for faxing. I'm not sure if anything has changed but at the
time they did not support MGCP. Unfortunately all our gateways were
MGCP at the time. Looked liked a good product with very fair pricing.
I think they price per B-channel used on a PRI.
Carlos
"Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll@wesd.org>
Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
02/19/2007 01:37 PM
To
"Robert Kulagowski" <bob@smalltime.com>
cc
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject
Re: [cisco-voip] Fax servers
I was just looking at this.... and it's forVM only installs. Which
doesn't make a lot of sense. But that's what it said.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Kulagowski [mailto:bob@smalltime.com]
Sent: Monday,February 19, 2007 10:21 AM
To: Voll, Scott
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax servers
> We want to be able to fax from the PC's and receive faxes in our
email.
> What would be the best option?
How about this?
http://www.ciscounitytools.com/App_...ationWizard.htm
It may not be robust enough for what you want to do, and there's lots of
caveats, but I think I remember Jeff Lindborg (aka, "Mr. Unity") saying
in the cisco forums that a lot of those were CYAs.
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
| |
| Voll, Scott 2007-02-19, 7:11 pm |
| Can I set it up like PSTN - PRI - VGW (MGCP) - CM - H323 VGW - Xmedius ?
or does the PSTN VGW have to be H323? I have no problem with H323 and
would move that way but I still have a legacy PBX behind CM and I just
have a route pattern xxxx to the PBX so if nothing matches on the CM it
goes to the PBX. I'm hoping to get rid of the PBX soon but with 500+
DID's and none in consecutive order H323 would be a night mare as I move
DID's over.
Scott
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons
(US)
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 2:07 PM
To: CarlosOrtiz@bayviewfinancial.com; Voll, Scott
Cc: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax servers
I think you'll find a lot of issues with MGCP, for example CVP, VXML,
Mobility Manager all require H323. While MGCP is simple to configure,
the features seem to be developed around H323.
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
CarlosOrtiz@bayviewfinancial.com
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 1:56 PM
To: Voll, Scott
Cc: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax servers
I did a trial run with Xmedius about 1 year ago. I believe you can use
it for inbound and outbound as you described. The real plus with
Xmedius is that it is a software only solution that uses your H.323
gateways for faxing. I'm not sure if anything has changed but at the
time they did not support MGCP. Unfortunately all our gateways were
MGCP at the time. Looked liked a good product with very fair pricing.
I think they price per B-channel used on a PRI.
Carlos
"Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll@wesd.org>
Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
02/19/2007 01:37 PM
To
"Robert Kulagowski" <bob@smalltime.com>
cc
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject
Re: [cisco-voip] Fax servers
I was just looking at this.... and it's for VM only installs. Which
doesn't make a lot of sense. But that's what it said.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Kulagowski [mailto:bob@smalltime.com]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:21 AM
To: Voll, Scott
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax servers
> We want to be able to fax from the PC's and receive faxes in our
email.
> What would be the best option?
How about this?
http://www.ciscounitytools.com/App_...ationWizard.htm
It may not be robust enough for what you want to do, and there's lots of
caveats, but I think I remember Jeff Lindborg (aka, "Mr. Unity") saying
in the cisco forums that a lot of those were CYAs.
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
________________________________
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
| |
| Matt Slaga \(US\) 2007-02-20, 7:11 am |
| Xmedius now supports fax over MGCP. The issue was actually a
callmanager limitation of allowing T38 through an MGCP gateway. Now
that this is fixed/added in 4.2(3), you can still keep your gateways on
MGCRAP and connect to your Xmedius server using H323.
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 5:19 PM
To: Jason Aarons (US); CarlosOrtiz@bayviewfinancial.com
Cc: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax servers
Can I set it up like PSTN - PRI - VGW (MGCP) - CM - H323 VGW - Xmedius ?
or does the PSTN VGW have to be H323?I have no problem with H323 and
would move that way but I still havea legacy PBX behind CM and I just
have a route pattern xxxx to the PBX so if nothing matches on the CM it
goes to the PBX. I'm hoping toget rid of the PBX soon but with 500+
DID's and none in consecutive order H323 would be a night mare as I move
DID's over.
Scott
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons
(US)
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 2:07 PM
To: CarlosOrtiz@bayviewfinancial.com; Voll, Scott
Cc: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax servers
I think you'll find a lot of issues with MGCP, for example CVP, VXML,
Mobility Manager all require H323. While MGCP is simple to configure,
the features seem to be developed around H323.
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
CarlosOrtiz@bayviewfinancial.com
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 1:56 PM
To: Voll, Scott
Cc: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax servers
I did a trial run with Xmedius about 1 year ago. I believe you can use
it for inbound and outbound as you described. The real plus with
Xmedius is that it is a software only solution that uses your H.323
gateways for faxing. I'm not sure if anything haschanged but at the
time they did not support MGCP. Unfortunately all our gateways were
MGCP at the time. Looked liked a good productwith very fair pricing.
I think they price per B-channel used on a PRI.
Carlos
"Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll@wesd.org>
Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
02/19/2007 01:37 PM
To
"Robert Kulagowski" <bob@smalltime.com>
cc
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject
Re: [cisco-voip] Fax servers
I was just looking at this.... and it's for VM only installs. Which
doesn't make a lot of sense. But that's what it said.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Kulagowski [mailto:bob@smalltime.com]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:21 AM
To: Voll, Scott
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax servers
> We want to be able to fax from the PC's and receive faxes inour
email.
> What would be the best option?
How about this?
http://www.ciscounitytools.com/App_...ationWizard.htm
It may not be robust enough for what you want to do, and there's lots of
caveats, but I think I remember Jeff Lindborg(aka, "Mr. Unity") saying
in the cisco forums that a lot of those were CYAs.
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
________________________________
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and isfor use by the designated
addressee(s) named above only. If you arenot the intended addressee,
you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify usimmediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately byreplying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
| |
| Voll, Scott 2007-02-28, 1:11 pm |
| How does the fax get to the right persons inbox?
Scott
________________________________
From: Linsemier, Matthew [mailto:MLinsemier@apcapital.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:20 AM
To: Voll, Scott; ciscovoip
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
I have implemented XMediusFax and from my opinion it to run circles
around the fax services built into cisco Unity. There are small
business and enterprise models. A 4-port version of the small business
model goes for around $6100 which supports unlimited mailboxes and
clients. Any number of ports can be configured as inbound or outbound,
but not both. The only caveat that we have run into (and it's the same
with all faxing solutions) is that there is only support for H.323.
MGCP is not supported and according to the Interstar tech support
engineers, this is a cisco issue and has been in their court to address
(T.38 faxing) for about 2 years.
-Matt
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 1:58 PM
To: ciscovoip
Subject: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
What kind of price range am I look at for a Fax server that ties in with
CM? what are the best out there. I have big xerox's that can do
scanning so I would like to tie it all together.
Can I use Unity as a fax server? How does that work?
Scott
________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
protected by one or more legal privileges. It is intended solely for the
use of the addressee identified above. If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this
communication is UNAUTHORIZED. Neither this information block, the typed
name of the sender, nor anything else in this message is intended to
constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the
contrary is included in this message. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately contact me and delete this
communication from your computer. Thank you.
________________________________
| |
| Jason Aarons \(US\) 2007-02-28, 1:11 pm |
| It does a LDAP lookup on any attribute you want. Can also be closest
match. So if my attribute ipPhone is 33604 (five digit extension) and a
fax comes in for 704-943-3604 you can setup closest match rule. You
could also dump faxes to a printer for unknowns, etc.
In practice we match AD attribute telephoneNumber.
XMedius is really a great product.
CVP, VoiceXML, T38 a lot of stuff doesn't work with MGCraP. However,
Calling Party Name does and I understand T38 for MGCP is either just
released or under development.
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 200712:30 PM
To: Linsemier, Matthew; ciscovoip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
How does the fax get to the right persons inbox?
Scott
________________________________
From: Linsemier, Matthew [mailto:MLinsemier@apcapital.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:20 AM
To: Voll, Scott; ciscovoip
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
I have implemented XMediusFax and from my opinion it to run circles
around the fax services built into cisco Unity. There are small
business and enterprise models. A 4-port version of the small business
model goes for around $6100 which supports unlimited mailboxes and
clients. Any number of ports can be configured as inboundor outbound,
but not both. The only caveat that we have run into (and it's the same
with all faxing solutions) is that there is only support for H.323.
MGCP is not supported and according to the Interstar tech support
engineers, this is a cisco issue and has been in theircourt to address
(T.38 faxing) for about 2 years.
-Matt
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 1:58 PM
To: ciscovoip
Subject: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
What kind of price range am I look at for a Fax server that ties in with
CM? what are the best out there. I have big xerox's that can do
scanning so I would like to tie it all together.
Can I use Unity as a fax server? How does that work?
Scott
________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
protected by one or more legal privileges. It is intended solely for the
use of the addressee identified above. If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this
communication is UNAUTHORIZED. Neither this information block, the typed
name of the sender, nor anything else in this message is intended to
constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the
contrary is included in this message. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately contact me and delete this
communication from your computer. Thank you.
________________________________
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
| |
| Voll, Scott 2007-02-28, 1:11 pm |
| Does it do an OCR for user name? How does it work if I have a Fax
number with many people using it?
Scott
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons
(US)
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 9:47 AM
To: ciscovoip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
It does a LDAP lookup on any attribute you want. Can also be closest
match. So if my attribute ipPhone is 33604 (five digit extension) and a
fax comes in for 704-943-3604 you can setup closest match rule. You
could also dump faxes to a printer for unknowns, etc.
In practice we match AD attribute telephoneNumber.
XMedius is really a great product.
CVP, VoiceXML, T38 a lot of stuff doesn't work with MGCraP. However,
Calling Party Name does and I understand T38 for MGCP is either just
released or under development.
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:30 PM
To: Linsemier, Matthew; ciscovoip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
How does the fax get to the right persons inbox?
Scott
________________________________
From: Linsemier, Matthew [mailto:MLinsemier@apcapital.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:20 AM
To: Voll, Scott; ciscovoip
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
I have implemented XMediusFax and from my opinion it to run circles
around the fax services built into cisco Unity. There are small
business and enterprise models. A 4-port version of the small business
model goes for around $6100 which supports unlimited mailboxes and
clients. Any number of ports can be configured as inbound or outbound,
but not both. The only caveat that we have run into (and it's the same
with all faxing solutions) is that there is only support for H.323.
MGCP is not supported and according to the Interstar tech support
engineers, this is a cisco issue and has been in their court to address
(T.38 faxing) for about 2 years.
-Matt
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 1:58 PM
To: ciscovoip
Subject: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
What kind of price range am I look at for a Fax server that ties in with
CM? what are the best out there. I have big xerox's that can do
scanning so I would like to tie it all together.
Can I use Unity as a fax server? How does that work?
Scott
________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
protected by one or more legal privileges. It is intended solely for the
use of the addressee identified above. If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this
communication is UNAUTHORIZED.. Neither this information block, the
typed name of the sender, nor anything else in this message is intended
to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the
contrary is included in this message. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately contact me and delete this
communication from your computer. Thank you.
________________________________
________________________________
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
| |
| embeleco 2007-02-28, 7:11 pm |
| CCM4.2(3) already support T.38 on MGCP and it works very well.
On 2/28/07, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll@wesd.org> wrote:
> Does it do an OCR for user name? How does it work if I have a Fax
> number with many people using it?
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons
> (US)
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 9:47 AM
> To: ciscovoip
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
>
>
>
> It does a LDAP lookup on any attribute you want. Can also be closest
> match. So if my attribute ipPhone is 33604 (five digit extension) and a
> fax comes in for 704-943-3604 you can setup closest match rule. You
> could also dump faxes to a printer for unknowns, etc.
>
>
>
> In practice we match AD attribute telephoneNumber.
>
>
>
> XMedius is really a great product.
>
>
>
> CVP, VoiceXML, T38 a lot of stuff doesn't work with MGCraP. However,
> Calling Party Name does and I understand T38 for MGCP is either just
> released or under development.
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:30 PM
> To: Linsemier, Matthew; ciscovoip
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
>
>
>
> How does the fax get to the right persons inbox?
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Linsemier, Matthew [mailto:MLinsemier@apcapital.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:20 AM
> To: Voll, Scott; ciscovoip
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
>
>
>
> I have implemented XMediusFax and from my opinion it to run circles
> around the fax services built into cisco Unity. There are small
> business and enterprise models. A 4-port version of the small business
> model goes for around $6100 which supports unlimited mailboxes and
> clients. Any number of ports can be configured as inbound or outbound,
> but not both. The only caveat that we have run into (and it's the same
> with all faxing solutions) is that there is only support for H.323.
> MGCP is not supported and according to the Interstar tech support
> engineers, this is a cisco issue and has been in their court to address
> (T.38 faxing) for about 2 years.
>
>
>
> -Matt
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 1:58 PM
> To: ciscovoip
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
>
>
>
> What kind of price range am I look at for a Fax server that ties in with
> CM? what are the best out there. I have big xerox's that can do
> scanning so I would like to tie it all together.
>
>
>
> Can I use Unity as a fax server? How does that work?
>
>
>
> Scott
>
> ________________________________
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
>
> This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
> protected by one or more legal privileges. It is intended solely for the
> use of the addressee identified above. If you are not the intended
> recipient, any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this
> communication is UNAUTHORIZED.. Neither this information block, the
> typed name of the sender, nor anything else in this message is intended
> to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the
> contrary is included in this message. If you have received this
> communication in error, please immediately contact me and delete this
> communication from your computer. Thank you.
>
> ________________________________
>
> ________________________________
>
> Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
> you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
> error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
> strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
> message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
>
>
| |
| Jason Aarons \(US\) 2007-02-28, 7:11 pm |
| Our local cisco engineers (sales) seems to push Linux 5.x, they have
told end users don't go to 4.2 as there is no 5.x upgrade path. They
still say this today...I'm more interested in Win2K3 then no root
Linux...(give me root and it's another story)...
-----Original Message-----
From: embeleco [mailto:embeleco@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 2:24 PM
To: Voll, Scott; Jason Aarons (US); ciscovoip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
CCM4.2(3) already support T.38 on MGCP and it works very well.
On 2/28/07, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll@wesd.org> wrote:
> Does it do an OCR for user name? How does it work if I have a Fax
> number with many people using it?
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons
> (US)
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 9:47 AM
> To: ciscovoip
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
>
>
>
> It does a LDAP lookup on any attribute you want. Can also be closest
> match. So if my attribute ipPhone is 33604 (five digit extension) and
a
> fax comes in for 704-943-3604 you can setup closest match rule. You
> could also dump faxes to a printer for unknowns, etc.
>
>
>
> In practice we match AD attribute telephoneNumber.
>
>
>
> XMedius is really a great product.
>
>
>
> CVP, VoiceXML, T38 a lot of stuff doesn't work with MGCraP. However,
> Calling Party Name does and I understand T38 for MGCP is either just
> released or under development.
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:30 PM
> To: Linsemier, Matthew; ciscovoip
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
>
>
>
> How does the fax get to the right persons inbox?
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Linsemier, Matthew [mailto:MLinsemier@apcapital.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:20 AM
> To: Voll, Scott; ciscovoip
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
>
>
>
> I have implemented XMediusFax and from my opinion it to run circles
> around the fax services built into cisco Unity. There are small
> business and enterprise models. A 4-port version of the small
business
> model goes for around $6100 which supports unlimited mailboxes and
> clients. Any number of ports can be configured as inbound or
outbound,
> but not both. The only caveat that we have run into (and it's the
same
> with all faxing solutions) is that there is only support for H.323.
> MGCP is not supported and according to the Interstar tech support
> engineers, this is a cisco issue and has been in their court to
address
> (T.38 faxing) for about 2 years.
>
>
>
> -Matt
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 1:58 PM
> To: ciscovoip
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
>
>
>
> What kind of price range am I look at for a Fax server that ties in
with
> CM? what are the best out there. I have big xerox's that can do
> scanning so I would like to tie it all together.
>
>
>
> Can I use Unity as a fax server? How does that work?
>
>
>
> Scott
>
> ________________________________
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
>
> This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
> protected by one or more legal privileges. It is intended solely for
the
> use of the addressee identified above. If you are not the intended
> recipient, any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this
> communication is UNAUTHORIZED.. Neither this information block, the
> typed name of the sender, nor anything else in this message is
intended
> to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to
the
> contrary is included in this message. If you have received this
> communication in error, please immediately contact me and delete this
> communication from your computer. Thank you.
>
> ________________________________
>
> ________________________________
>
> Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
> you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
> error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents
is
> strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to
this
> message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
>
>
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|