|
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > March 2007 > Anyone have the 7921G yet?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Anyone have the 7921G yet?
|
|
|
|
| Jason Aarons \(US\) 2007-03-22, 7:11 pm |
| Yes in January, works much better, greatly improved! I had a 802.11
instructor who said it's the best 802.11 radio he's seen in this type of
product.
I was impressed by the changes in the 792, gone to Java color screen
versus grayscale B&W . I did not care for the nokia 6X/8X phones with
802.11 radios. They had issues and were not friendly for
troubleshooting what was wrong.
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Stu Packett
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 2:17 PM
To: ciscovoip
Subject: [cisco-voip] Anyone have the 7921G yet?
I just saw that cisco listed the 7921G on their website. Has anyone
actually used ityet?
http://cisco.com/en/US/products/ps7071/index.html
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have receivedthis communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying tothis message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
| |
| Rohit Verma 2007-03-23, 1:11 am |
| Yes I have used it. It's a wireless coloured display handset. We have got it
last year only. But its firmware has been uploaded in Jan, 07 only. So it
was lying unused in my office since then.Now its in use.
Regards..!!
Rohit Verma
_____
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Stu Packett
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 11:47 PM
To: ciscovoip
Subject: [cisco-voip] Anyone have the 7921G yet?
I just saw that cisco listed the 7921G on their website. Has anyone
actually used it yet?
http://cisco.com/en/US/products/ps7071/index.html
| |
|
|
|
|
| Johnson, Ken 2007-03-23, 7:11 pm |
| In my experience - it definitely is in the multiple hours of talk time -
can't say I've tried 8 without re-cradling it. Pretty sure I've gone
close to 4 at least. I usually drop it in the cradle after I'm done
talking so don't have extended figures for what happens if I talk for
four hours and then leave it on standby and pick up later without a
recharge.
Standby time? I'd say it has at least 50 hours - which is an improvement
over the 7920's 24 hour time even with extended battery J It probably
has more - again - two days is about the max I've left it off the
charger intentionally or otherwise.
Ken Johnson
Mgr. Network Services,
Information Technology
LeTourneau University
_________________________________
http://www.ciptug.org
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonvoip@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 2:50 PM
To: Johnson, Ken
Cc: Stu Packett; ciscovoip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Anyone have the 7921G yet?
Well, it certainly prettier...
Question is, does it live up the advertised battery life?
8 hours of talk time, 100 hours of standby time...
Jonathan
On 3/23/07, Johnson, Ken <kenjohnson@letu.edu> wrote:
Yes and it is a 200% improvement over the 7920. I can't recommend it
enough.
Ken Johnson
Mgr. Network Services,
Information Technology
LeTourneau University
_________________________________
http://www.ciptug.org
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Stu Packett
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 1:17 PM
To: ciscovoip
Subject: [cisco-voip] Anyone have the 7921G yet?
I just saw that cisco listed the 7921G on their website. Has anyone
actually used it yet?
http://cisco.com/en/US/products/ps7071/index.html
________________________________
Spam <http://antispam.letu.edu/canit/b.ph...&m=8619f27ff58f>
Not spam
<http://antispam.letu.edu/canit/b.ph...&m=8619f27ff58f>
Forget previous vote
<http://antispam.letu.edu/canit/b.ph...&m=8619f27ff58f>
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
________________________________
Spam <http://antispam.letu.edu/canit/b.ph...&m=b2910973c266>
Not spam
<http://antispam.letu.edu/canit/b.ph...&m=b2910973c266>
Forget previous vote
<http://antispam.letu.edu/canit/b.ph...&m=b2910973c266>
| |
| Ryan Ratliff 2007-03-24, 7:11 pm |
| Mine was down to minimal battery level afte 2 days idle. I didn't wait
until it died though. This is while associated however. I took it home
one night to try and get working to my AP at home (no WPA so couldn't work).
A few hours idle with no association really killed the battery.
-Ryan
_____
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Johnson, Ken
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 3:55 PM
To: Jonathan Charles
Cc: ciscovoip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Anyone have the 7921G yet?
In my experience - it definitely is in the multiple hours of talk time -
can't say I've tried 8 without re-cradling it. Pretty sure I've gone close
to 4 at least. I usually drop it in the cradle after I'm done talking so
don't have extended figures for what happens if I talk for four hours and
then leave it on standby and pick up later without a recharge.
Standby time? I'd say it has at least 50 hours - which is an improvement
over the 7920's 24 hour time even with extended battery J It probably has
more - again - two days is about the max I've left it off the charger
intentionally or otherwise.
Ken Johnson
Mgr. Network Services,
Information Technology
LeTourneau University
_________________________________
http://www.ciptug.org
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonvoip@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 2:50 PM
To: Johnson, Ken
Cc: Stu Packett; ciscovoip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Anyone have the 7921G yet?
Well, it certainly prettier...
Question is, does it live up the advertised battery life?
8 hours of talk time, 100 hours of standby time...
Jonathan
On 3/23/07, Johnson, Ken <kenjohnson@letu.edu> wrote:
Yes and it is a 200% improvement over the 7920. I can't recommend it enough.
Ken Johnson
Mgr. Network Services,
Information Technology
LeTourneau University
_________________________________
http://www.ciptug.org
_____
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Stu Packett
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 1:17 PM
To: ciscovoip
Subject: [cisco-voip] Anyone have the 7921G yet?
I just saw that cisco listed the 7921G on their website. Has anyone
actually used it yet?
http://cisco.com/en/US/products/ps7071/index.html
_____
Spam <http://antispam.letu.edu/canit/b.ph...&m=8619f27ff58f>
Not spam <http://antispam.letu.edu/canit/b.ph...&m=8619f27ff58f>
Forget previous vote
<http://antispam.letu.edu/canit/b.ph...&m=8619f27ff58f>
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_____
Spam <http://antispam.letu.edu/canit/b.ph...&m=b2910973c266>
Not <http://antispam.letu.edu/canit/b.ph...&m=b2910973c266>
spam
Forget <http://antispam.letu.edu/canit/b.ph...&m=b2910973c266>
previous vote
| |
| Jonathan Charles 2007-03-25, 1:11 pm |
| Same problem with the 7920... if you walked off-site with it, it would go
into hyper-AP search and kill the battery...
Jonathan
On 3/24/07, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Mine was down to minimal battery level afte 2 days idle. I didn't wait
> until it died though. This is while associated however. I took it home
> one night to try and get working to my AP at home (no WPA so couldn't
> work). A few hours idle with no association really killed the battery.
>
>
> -Ryan
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Johnson, Ken
> *Sent:* Friday, March 23, 2007 3:55 PM
> *To:* Jonathan Charles
> *Cc:* ciscovoip
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Anyone have the 7921G yet?
>
> In my experience it definitely is in the multiple hours of talk time
> can't say I've tried 8 without re-cradling it. Pretty sure I've gone close
> to 4 at least. I usually drop it in the cradle after I'm done talking so
> don't have extended figures for what happens if I talk for four hours and
> then leave it on standby and pick up later without a recharge.
>
>
>
> Standby time? I'd say it has at least 50 hours which is an improvement
> over the 7920's 24 hour time even with extended battery J It probably has
> more again two days is about the max I've left it off the charger
> intentionally or otherwise.
>
>
>
> Ken Johnson
> Mgr. Network Services,
> Information Technology
> LeTourneau University
> _________________________________
> http://www.ciptug.org
>
>
>
> *From:* Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonvoip@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, March 23, 2007 2:50 PM
> *To:* Johnson, Ken
> *Cc:* Stu Packett; ciscovoip
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Anyone have the 7921G yet?
>
>
>
> Well, it certainly prettier...
>
> Question is, does it live up the advertised battery life?
>
> 8 hours of talk time, 100 hours of standby time...
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On 3/23/07, *Johnson, Ken* <kenjohnson@letu.edu> wrote:
>
> Yes and it is a 200% improvement over the 7920. I can't recommend it
> enough.
>
>
>
> Ken Johnson
> Mgr. Network Services,
> Information Technology
> LeTourneau University
> _________________________________
> http://www.ciptug.org
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Stu Packett
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 22, 2007 1:17 PM
> *To:* ciscovoip
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Anyone have the 7921G yet?
>
> I just saw that cisco listed the 7921G on their website. Has anyone
> actually used it yet?
>
>
>
> http://cisco.com/en/US/products/ps7071/index.html
> ------------------------------
>
>
> Spam <http://antispam.letu.edu/canit/b.ph...&m=8619f27ff58f>
> Not spam<http://antispam.letu.edu/canit/b.ph...&m=8619f27ff58f>
> Forget previous vote<http://antispam.letu.edu/canit/b.ph...&m=8619f27ff58f>
>
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> Spam <http://antispam.letu.edu/canit/b.ph...&m=b2910973c266>
> Not spam<http://antispam.letu.edu/canit/b.ph...&m=b2910973c266>
> Forget previous vote<http://antispam.letu.edu/canit/b.ph...&m=b2910973c266>
>
|
|
|
|
|