Voice over IP Cisco - FW: Route Plan

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > March 2007 > FW: Route Plan





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author FW: Route Plan
Kathy Dupree

2007-03-28, 7:11 pm

I am resending this message. I got one response this morning. Any
ideas?



Katherine O. Dupree

Randolph-Macon Woman's College

Main 243

Telecommunications Support/Infrastructure Coordinator

kdupree@rmwc.edu

(434) 947 8371



From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kathy Dupree
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 8:38 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Route Plan



Can anyone tell me why when I am looking for unassigned DNs that some
DNs that ARE being used show up in the list? This is the only way I
know of to look for an unassigned number when I am installing a new
phone. But I have learned to be very careful when using the unassigned
DNs under Route Plan. Thanks



Katherine O. Dupree

Randolph-Macon Woman's College

Main 243

Telecommunications Support/Infrastructure Coordinator

kdupree@rmwc.edu

(434) 947 8371




Lelio Fulgenzi

2007-03-28, 7:11 pm

I agree with that response. I believe unassigned DNs are partition 'aware'.

You could try it out.

Create a DN in one partition on a phone. After the update, change the partition to something else. I'm sure you will see the original DN/partition combo in the unassigned DN route list. I'm sure I've seen it before.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
....there's no such thing as a bad timbit...

----- Original Message -----
From: Kathy Dupree
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:59 PM
Subject: [cisco-voip] FW: Route Plan


I am resending this message. I got one response this morning. Any ideas?



Katherine O. Dupree

Randolph-Macon Woman's College

Main 243

Telecommunications Support/Infrastructure Coordinator

kdupree@rmwc.edu

(434) 947 8371



From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kathy Dupree
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 8:38 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Route Plan



Can anyone tell me why when I am looking for unassigned DNs that some DNs that ARE being used show up in the list? This is the only way I know of to look for an unassigned number when I am installing a new phone. But I have learned to be very careful when using the unassigned DNs under Route Plan. Thanks



Katherine O. Dupree

Randolph-Macon Woman's College

Main 243

Telecommunications Support/Infrastructure Coordinator

kdupree@rmwc.edu

(434) 947 8371





------------------------------------------------------------------------------


________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Voll, Scott

2007-03-28, 7:11 pm

I think this is correct based on what I'm seeing also.



Scott



________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 12:03 PM
To: Kathy Dupree; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FW: Route Plan



I agree with that response. I believe unassigned DNs are partition
'aware'.



You could try it out.



Create a DN in one partition on a phone. After the update, change the
partition to something else. I'm sure you will see the original
DN/partition combo in the unassigned DN route list. I'm sure I've seen
it before.





------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
....there's no such thing as a bad timbit...

----- Original Message -----

From: Kathy Dupree <mailto:kdupree@rmwc.edu>

To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:59 PM

Subject: [cisco-voip] FW: Route Plan



I am resending this message. I got one response this morning.
Any ideas?



Katherine O. Dupree

Randolph-Macon Woman's College

Main 243

Telecommunications Support/Infrastructure Coordinator

kdupree@rmwc.edu

(434) 947 8371



From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kathy Dupree
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 8:38 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Route Plan



Can anyone tell me why when I am looking for unassigned DNs that
some DNs that ARE being used show up in the list? This is the only way
I know of to look for an unassigned number when I am installing a new
phone. But I have learned to be very careful when using the unassigned
DNs under Route Plan. Thanks



Katherine O. Dupree

Randolph-Macon Woman's College

Main 243

Telecommunications Support/Infrastructure Coordinator

kdupree@rmwc.edu

(434) 947 8371




________________________________


________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


________________________________


________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com