Voice over IP Cisco - Re: Quick Question About 911 Policy - Please

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > March 2007 > Re: Quick Question About 911 Policy - Please





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Quick Question About 911 Policy - Please
Miller, Steve

2007-03-31, 7:11 am

Thanks to all who responded. There were some very good ideas out there.
I will let you know what we decide after determining our legal
obligations. Cheers!


Steve Miller
Telecom Engineer
Dickstein Shapiro LLP
1825 Eye Street NW | Washington, DC 20006
Tel (202) 420-3370 Fax (202)-330-5607
millers@dicksteinshapiro.com


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ted Nugent
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 12:03 AM
To: Ed Leatherman; Jason Burwell
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Quick Question About 911 Policy - Please
Respond-Quick Response

In my previous position we had a serious problem with this at hundreds
of locations throughout the US and in some states the charges were
outrageous. What we ended up doing was create a TP for 911 that pointed
to a Unity AA or IPCC depending on the cluster (prefix site code),
prompting the user to dial 9911 in the future however if it was an
emergency they could hit 9 to be transferred to emergency services (if 9
was hit, transfer to sitecode+911CH, hits TP of sitecode.911 which
striped predot and out the local RL). Fairly admin intensive but much
cheaper then the alternative.



--- Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman@gmail.com> wrote:

> What? I didnt call 911 by accident, your cdr records are certainly
> wrong!
> (never mind the callmanager traces showing the keys being pressed)
>
> Getting people here to stay on the line and explain
> (admit) that they
> misdialed and there is no emergency has been a struggle =\
>
>
> On 3/30/07, Jason Burwell
> <BurwellJ@firstcharter.com> wrote:
> explain that it was an
> police response. If
> seems to work OK for us
> patterns!
> [mailto:
> *Kris Seraphine
> 911 Policy - Please
> down on false dials but 20
> extreme. Do you have
> had situations where a
> dialing rules incorrectly
> to do a CDR search for 911
> the same source.
> <jrobbins@mercurypay.com> wrote:
> with 9 as the access code.
> between 20 and 30 911 false
> a year ago and have had 3
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]
> 911 Policy - Please
> should be able to pick up
> emergency assistance...
> good idea... (do you want
> code to 7 or 8 to ensure
> <MillerS@dicksteinshapiro.com> wrote:
> as well as (9) 911. Is
> We've had 100 false 911 calls
> restrict 911 and force everyone
> would for any other outside
> know!
>

--------------------------------------------------------
> confidential and are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s)
> named above. This communication may contain material protected by
> attorney-client, work product, or other privileges. If you are not the


> intended recipient or person responsible for delivering this
> confidential communication to the intended recipient, you have
> received this communication in error, and any review, use,
> dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of


> this e-mail message and any attached files is strictly prohibited.
> Dickstein Shapiro reserves the right to monitor any communication that


> is created, received, or sent on its network. If you have received
> this confidential communication in error, please notify the sender
> immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete the
> original message.
> an email to postmaster@dicksteinshapiro.com
> <http://www.dicksteinshapiro.com/>
>

========================================
================================
======
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

=== message truncated ===>
________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>






________________________________________
________________________________
____________
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


--------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail message and any attached files are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above. This communication may contain material protected by attorney-client, work product, or other privileges. If you are not the in
tended recipient or person responsible for delivering this confidential communication to the intended recipient, you have received this communication in error, and any review, use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of thi
s e-mail message and any attached files is strictly prohibited. Dickstein Shapiro reserves the right to monitor any communication that is created, received, or sent on its network. If you have received this confidential communication in error, please not
ify the sender immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to postmaster@dicksteinshapiro.com

Dickstein Shapiro LLP
http://www.DicksteinShapiro.com
========================================
======================================
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com