Voice over IP Cisco - Re: Quick Question About 911 Policy -

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > April 2007 > Re: Quick Question About 911 Policy -





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Quick Question About 911 Policy -
Dave Wolgast

2007-04-02, 1:11 pm

On 4/2/07, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll@wesd.org> wrote:
>
> I like the idea................ But I don't like the idea that Unity or
> IPCCx has to be used. What if, it's down for some reason and someone
> needs 911. If CM is down you know it..... if Unity is down, it could be
> hours before someone says something.
>
> Is there a way, though, that it could be configured so that if Unity/CRS

is down, the call gets sent directly to the 911 center? My initial thought
is that 911 becomes a CTI RP for CRS with a CF Busy/NA to 9-911. When CRS
is up, the script will play a "You have dialed 911 emergency. If you did
not intend this, please hang up now. Otherwise, stay on the line and your
call will be connected." or whatever, then send the call out. If CRS is
unavailable, the call follows the CF Busy/NA path. There would have to be
one of these RPs for each location, placed in a partition isolated only to
that location, so that the 911 call goes out the right set of trunks to
properly ID the call.

Sound reasonable/practical???


--
Dave Wolgast
Livonia, NY

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com