| Lelio Fulgenzi 2007-04-30, 1:11 pm |
| MLLP would take care of this, correct?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
....there's no such thing as a bad timbit...
----- Original Message -----
From: Jonathan Charles
To: Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] extra analog lines for 911 where a PRI exists - makes sense?
Actually, we put in a few analogs so we can dedicate circuits for 911...
While Scott's argument makes sense, it misses the fact that most PRIs are heavily oversubscribed.
Jonathan
On 4/30/07, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio@uoguelph.ca> wrote:
Just wondering if anyone can help me justify ordering a couple of analog lines for 911 service which will go into the same router and be serviced by the same local telephone switch and likely be carried over the same path as the PRIs. I already have two single port PRI cards to protect against single point of failure of the PRI card. But in the end, if the router goes down, it's down.
Anyone ever see a PRI port go down but FXO ports stay up?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
|