Voice over IP Cisco - Re: extra analog lines for 911 where a PRI exists -

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > April 2007 > Re: extra analog lines for 911 where a PRI exists -





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: extra analog lines for 911 where a PRI exists -
Lelio Fulgenzi

2007-04-30, 1:11 pm

I'm confused. I'm looking for MLPP to drop a call so that 911 gets out. What does transferring to poison control or CPR have to do with anything?

Once the call is pre-empted, it's through. Isn't it?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
....there's no such thing as a bad timbit...

----- Original Message -----
From: Jonathan Charles
To: Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] extra analog lines for 911 where a PRI exists - makes sense?


Yes and no.

Here's the problem.

Let's say a user calls 911, and the operator transfers them to a poison control unit or a CPR expert and it is just a local number... there is a possibility that the MLPP would not recognize this as an emergency call and bump it.

However, this may be an urban legend...



Jonathan


On 4/30/07, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio@uoguelph.ca > wrote:
MLLP would take care of this, correct?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...

----- Original Message -----
From: Jonathan Charles
To: Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] extra analog lines for 911 where a PRI exists - makes sense?


Actually, we put in a few analogs so we can dedicate circuits for 911...

While Scott's argument makes sense, it misses the fact that most PRIs are heavily oversubscribed.



Jonathan


On 4/30/07, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio@uoguelph.ca> wrote:
Just wondering if anyone can help me justify ordering a couple of analog lines for 911 service which will go into the same router and be serviced by the same local telephone switch and likely be carried over the same path as the PRIs. I already have two single port PRI cards to protect against single point of failure of the PRI card. But in the end, if the router goes down, it's down.

Anyone ever see a PRI port go down but FXO ports stay up?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...


________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip






Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com