| keli@carocomp.ro 2007-06-12, 7:11 pm |
| How about size and scalability?
Ease of management?
Even though I'm familiar enough with IOS, CME just seems a PITA to
configure and manage sometimes versus the (no too fantastic either)
web-based interface of CCM. CME's web based interface doesn't even
count as a proper interface, if you ask me 
On the other hand, as far as I know/understand, CME 4x series is more
the little sibling of the 5x series of CCM, rather than the series 4x
(that would be more "comparable" to CME 3x). Things like SIP endpoint
support, support for the latest cisco SCCP phones, etc.
Can't really provide a point on the Unity differences though.
regards,
Zoltan
Quoting Robert Kulagowski <bob@smalltime.com>:
> Here's what I've come up with: anything else?
>
> CME 4.1
> -No Extension Mobility
> -No Attendant console (but it has a "real" BLF)
> -No webdialer
> -Site Wide speed dials harder to manage - file stored on router instead
> of CTI port in CM.
> -Another management console to learn/teach for moves, adds and changes
> -Another user login and password (not tied to AD for user or management GUI)
> -No I-divert softkey
> -Can access CM directory
>
> Unity Express 2.3
> -Voicemails are just a .wav file, no viewmail, user has to use media player
> -User's outlook has to be configured with IMAP connection
> -VoiceView Express - voicemail GUI is available on the phone itself
> -Auto Attendant scripts are similar to IPCC scripting
> -Can network with Unity
> -Shares management console with CME so only 1 place to manage phones and
> voicemail for that site
> -Shares user database with CME
> -VM doesn't show up on blackberry
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
|