| Lelio Fulgenzi 2007-06-12, 7:11 pm |
| have you considered the small business edition?
it has zero upgrade path, but if it's a small office it might do what you need.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * university of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo." WJR
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Kulagowski
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CME 4.1 vs. CM 4.1.3 and Unity Express 2.3 vs. Unity 4.2(1)
keli@carocomp.ro wrote:
> How about size and scalability?
> Ease of management?
Well, this is for Johannesburg, and our centralized CM's are in the U.S.
and London, so latency would kill us. That's why we're considering
either local CM or CME.
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
|