| Jason Aarons \(US\) 2007-06-13, 1:11 pm |
| I've seen BRI MGCP and IP Phones registered to US CallManagers as well
as phones off satellite links. You can't call cisco for support should
you have issues but it worked and was cheaper than the alternatives.
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Craig Staffin
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9:57 AM
To: Robert Kulagowski
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CME4.1 vs. CM 4.1.3 and Unity Express 2.3
vs.Unity 4.2(1)
Robert,
What is your round trip time.I have personally done deployments with
the CCM's in the US and remote phones in Singapore and China with no
complaints from users.
Craig
On 6/12/07, Robert Kulagowski <bob@smalltime.com> wrote:
keli@carocomp.ro wrote:
> How about size and scalability?
> Ease of management?
Well, this is for Johannesburg, and our centralized CM's are in the U.S.
and London, so latency would kill us. That's why we're considering
either local CM orCME.
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
--
Craig Staffin
Craig@staffin.org
(H) 262-437-7313
(C) 262-613-6003
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use bythe
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or itscontents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
|