Voice over IP Cisco - Re: New Winner-Worst Cisco Documentation Award!!!

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Voice over IP Cisco > August 2007 > Re: New Winner-Worst Cisco Documentation Award!!!





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: New Winner-Worst Cisco Documentation Award!!!
Christopher M. Bomba

2007-08-30, 1:11 pm

I had to install Mobility Manager last year when it was still pretty new and when I called TAC the engineer asked me to send him the document because they sent me to a TAC engineer that hadn't even seen CMM yet. After working with the guy for a full day
they finally escalated to someone that knew what they were talking about and I got it working. The documentation was Poo back then and haven't dealt with it since, but I guess people didn't complain enough to have them go back and rework the docs. I was
glad to get that behind me.

Can't wait to see what we have to do to get that functionality working in CUCM 6.0. It is built into the software now, no need for separate server.

Chris


Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:47:22 -0500
From: Robert Kulagowski <bob@smalltime.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] New Winner-Worst cisco Documentation
Award!!!
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <46D586FA.8070604@smalltime.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Ted Nugent wrote:
> Ahh yes however once you finally do track down the
> Unity Doc you need its typically pretty good.
>
> For instance they wouldn't call a DN (Distinguished
> Name) a Directory Number like they do in the CMM
> docs..


You are in a twisty maze of passageways, all alike...
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com