|
|
| Kathy Dupree 2007-09-19, 1:12 pm |
| Is there a way to make *69 or *59 work with call Manager. I have talked
to my local provider and it seems I need a court order for them to trace
a call. Someone asked if *69 or *59 worked and it does not. Any
ideas?
Katherine O. Dupree
Randolph College
Main 243
Telecommunications Support/Infrastructure Coordinator
kdupree@randolphcollege.edu <mailto:kdupree@rmwc.edu>
(434) 947 8371
| |
| Matthew Saskin 2007-09-19, 1:12 pm |
| I'm not sure if it's included in the default dial plan if using the @
wildcard. If not, you'd need to set up a specific route pattern for *69
that forwards those digits out a specific port.
Another thing to consider is whether the telco will accept *69 off of a
digital circuit. I know here we are only able to get the telco to
recognize *67 (caller ID block) on analog lines.
-matt
Kathy Dupree wrote:
> Is there a way to make *69 or *59 work with call Manager. I have talked
> to my local provider and it seems I need a court order for them to trace
> a call. Someone asked if *69 or *59 worked and it does not. Any ideas?
>
>
>
> *Katherine O. Dupree*
>
> *Randolph College***
>
> *Main 243*
>
> *Telecommunications Support/Infrastructure Coordinator*
>
> *kdupree@randolphcollege.edu <mailto:kdupree@rmwc.edu>*
>
> *(434) 947 8371*
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
| |
| Scott Voll 2007-09-19, 1:12 pm |
| problem with this is you might not be getting the right channel on your
PRI. therefore the*69 might work but no gaurentee its the right call your
getting.
Scott
On 9/19/07, Kathy Dupree <KDupree@randolphcollege.edu> wrote:
>
> Is there a way to make *69 or *59 work with call Manager. I have talked
> to my local provider and it seems I need a court order for them to trace a
> call. Someone asked if *69 or *59 worked and it does not. Any ideas?
>
>
>
> *Katherine O. Dupree*
>
> *Randolph College***
>
> *Main 243*
>
> *Telecommunications Support/Infrastructure Coordinator*
>
> *kdupree@randolphcollege.edu <kdupree@rmwc.edu>*
>
> *(434) 947 8371*
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
| |
| Brian E. Henry 2007-09-19, 7:11 pm |
| Kathy,
Maybe in the future if you are intereseted or find the need for it, you can look into this companies products http://www.securelogix.com
---- Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com> wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> problem with this is you might not be getting the right channel on your
> PRI. therefore the*69 might work but no gaurentee its the right call your
> getting.
>
> Scott
>
>
> On 9/19/07, Kathy Dupree <KDupree@randolphcollege.edu> wrote:
| |
|
|
|
|