|
Home > Archive > Voice Over IP > July 2005 > multiple DID ( virtual Numbers ) sipura SPA-3000
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
multiple DID ( virtual Numbers ) sipura SPA-3000
|
|
| SIP2PSTN 2005-07-22, 7:46 am |
|
Hello ! I would like to know that can I configure multiple virtual
numbers ( DID numbers ) to single Sipura SPA-3000 and have them all
work actively at the same time .
--
SIP2PSTN
| |
| B.M. Wright 2005-07-22, 8:45 pm |
| SIP2PSTN <SIP2PSTN.1sko8p@news.broadbandbanter.com> wrote:
> Hello ! I would like to know that can I configure multiple virtual
> numbers ( DID numbers ) to single Sipura SPA-3000 and have them all
> work actively at the same time .
One of the only crappy things about the SPA-3000 is that they
only allow registration on one of the SIP accounts (or, possibly one per
line for a total of two?). The other SIP accounts you put in there are
going to be outbound only. Some workarounds to this, including running
Asterisk or doing hacks like forwarding all the other SIP accounts to
the one that you actually can register. None of them are as good as
Sipura actually fixing this lameness in firmware and allowing
registration on all of the SIP accounts. I don't know that there is any
reason why they couldn't, other than they haven't done it, and who knows
if/when they will (especially now that Cisco/Linksys took over).
| |
| Kyler Laird 2005-07-24, 2:45 am |
| "B.M. Wright" <bmwright@xmission.xmission.com> writes:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> One of the only crappy things about the SPA-3000 is that they
>only allow registration on one of the SIP accounts (or, possibly one per
>line for a total of two?).
It's one per line for a total of two.
>The other SIP accounts you put in there are
>going to be outbound only. Some workarounds to this, including running
>Asterisk or doing hacks like forwarding all the other SIP accounts to
>the one that you actually can register.
With Asterisk running on a $60 wireless access point, this becomes quite
a viable solution. I like it much more than waiting for Sipura/Cisco/
Linksys to provide the functionality I want.
(I've got a bunch of SPA-3000s and a bunch of WRT-54GS routers...I'm
looking forward to configuring them to work together.)
--kyler
| |
| Wolfgang S. Rupprecht 2005-07-24, 2:45 am |
|
Kyler Laird <Kyler@news.Lairds.org> writes:
> With Asterisk running on a $60 wireless access point, this becomes quite
> a viable solution. I like it much more than waiting for Sipura/Cisco/
> Linksys to provide the functionality I want.
>
> (I've got a bunch of SPA-3000s and a bunch of WRT-54GS routers...I'm
> looking forward to configuring them to work together.)
I wonder, might the SPA series be running linux too? I guess I don't
even know how folks first discovered that the WRT-54 was running
linux.
-wolfgang
--
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht http://www.wsrcc.com/wolfgang/
| |
| Enzo Michelangeli 2005-07-24, 5:45 pm |
| Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> Kyler Laird <Kyler@news.Lairds.org> writes:
Kyler: a while ago I opened a thread dedicated to Asterisk on OpenWRT
at http://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=1419 . Check it out. I run
that configuration myself at home and I'm very happy with it (my
initial goal was just to register my SPA-3000 on multiple SIP accounts,
but then I got hooked :-) ).
[vbcol=seagreen]
> I wonder, might the SPA series be running linux too? I guess I don't
> even know how folks first discovered that the WRT-54 was running
> linux.
See this post:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2003/6/7/164
Most of the following steps are chronicled by posts archived here:
http://www.seattlewireless.net/pipe...uly/thread.html
Enzo
| |
| B.M. Wright 2005-07-25, 2:45 am |
| Enzo Michelangeli <nospam@em.no-ip.com> wrote:
> Kyler: a while ago I opened a thread dedicated to Asterisk on OpenWRT
> at http://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=1419 . Check it out. I run
> that configuration myself at home and I'm very happy with it (my
> initial goal was just to register my SPA-3000 on multiple SIP accounts,
> but then I got hooked :-) ).
Just curious, this is pretty far off topic, but what the hell.
Have you used H.323 at all under OpenWRT? I have a WRT54GS but just
haven't bothered getting asterisk/sipath working (yes, I know sipath
will not do H.323). I also have a cisco router with FXS ports that
doesn't speak SIP, only H.323. If H.323 works well under OpenWRT then
this could be good enough motivation to spend a bit of time getting it
going. 
| |
| Enzo Michelangeli 2005-07-25, 7:45 am |
| B.M. Wright wrote:
> Enzo Michelangeli <nospam@em.no-ip.com> wrote:
>
>
> Just curious, this is pretty far off topic, but what the hell.
> Have you used H.323 at all under OpenWRT?
Never tried, and actually as far as I know the support for H.323 in
Asterisk is only partial (see e.g.
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+H323+Channels ).
> I have a WRT54GS but just
> haven't bothered getting asterisk/sipath working (yes, I know sipath
> will not do H.323). I also have a cisco router with FXS ports that
> doesn't speak SIP, only H.323. If H.323 works well under OpenWRT then
> this could be good enough motivation to spend a bit of time getting it
> going.
What is the model of your cisco router? Perhaps it can also speak MGCP
or SCCP/Skinny, both of which have implementations ported to OpenWRT
(although I personally never tested them).
Enzo
| |
| B.M. Wright 2005-07-26, 7:45 am |
| Enzo Michelangeli <nospam@em.no-ip.com> wrote:
> B.M. Wright wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Never tried, and actually as far as I know the support for H.323 in
> Asterisk is only partial (see e.g.
> http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+H323+Channels ).
Hmm.. so chan_h323 is not capable of allowing an h.323 endpoint
to register with it? It looks like oh323 does, maybe not available for
OpenWRT though, or possibly to heavy weight to run on one.
[vbcol=seagreen]
> What is the model of your cisco router? Perhaps it can also speak MGCP
> or SCCP/Skinny, both of which have implementations ported to OpenWRT
> (although I personally never tested them).
Don't think so, but I know it does h.323. I'll have to go look
for the most recent IOS that I will run on this and check for MGCP/SCCP
support in that. It's an EOL UBR924 cable modem/router (which also has
two FXS ports). Being EOL for quite some time limits the IOS/featureset
that I can find for it.
| |
| Enzo Michelangeli 2005-07-26, 5:45 pm |
| B.M. Wright wrote:
[...]
> Hmm.. so chan_h323 is not capable of allowing an h.323 endpoint
> to register with it? It looks like oh323 does, maybe not available for
> OpenWRT though, or possibly to heavy weight to run on one.
Possibly. But H.323 is dying, and I don't think much development will
be spent on it.
>
> Don't think so, but I know it does h.323. I'll have to go look
> for the most recent IOS that I will run on this and check for MGCP/SCCP
> support in that. It's an EOL UBR924 cable modem/router (which also has
> two FXS ports). Being EOL for quite some time limits the IOS/featureset
> that I can find for it.
At
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/a...May/012072.html
someone mentions that MGCP is supported on IOS 12.2, but with
interoperability problems with Asterisk.
You may also want to check out
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products...008007cd12.html
where it's said that "12.1(3)T and higher software images that support
voice, the cisco uBR924 router can use the MGCP protocol for routing
voice call" and there are detailed configuration instructions.
Enzo
|
|
|
|
|