|
Home > Archive > Apache JDO Project > November 2005 > TCK : ImplicitParameters testResult
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
TCK : ImplicitParameters testResult
|
|
| Andy Jefferson 2005-11-06, 8:45 pm |
| The ImplicitParameters test has a test called "testResult" that puts a parameter
in the result.
Let's leave aside why anyone would want to do this, other than insanity :-)
Looking at the result of the test (with JPOX CVS) I now get
[java] expected: [[Ljava.lang.Object;@18e1286, [Ljava.lang.Object;@6231c0,
[Ljava.lang.Object;@b0740c, [Ljava.lang.Object;@92c969, [Ljava.lang.Object;@e54d6a]
[java] got: [[Ljava.lang.Object;@3d96b7, [Ljava.lang.Object;@171fdd8,
[Ljava.lang.Object;@d08216, [Ljava.lang.Object;@10c7af9, [Ljava.lang.Object;@5da750]
That is, JPOX returns a List of Object[], and the expected is a List of Object[].
Scanning through the test I don't see evidence that the test is checking the
results of each Object[], just comparing the object array objects which will
clearly have different object array references. Can someone please review the
test, and either correct it if it needs correcting, or get it to give more
information on the actual error here - is the object returned wrong?, is the
parameter returned wrong ?
Thx
--
Andy
| |
| Michael Bouschen 2005-11-06, 8:45 pm |
| Hi Andy,
you are right, the current implementation of testing the query result
does not work in case of Object[]. Michael W. is currently working on
adding new TCK classes testing the query result handling (JDO-164). He
ran into the same problem and changed the code checking the query result
already. I expect this code being checked in early next week.
Regards Michael
>The ImplicitParameters test has a test called "testResult" that puts a parameter
>in the result.
>Let's leave aside why anyone would want to do this, other than insanity :-)
>Looking at the result of the test (with JPOX CVS) I now get
>
> [java] expected: [[Ljava.lang.Object;@18e1286, [Ljava.lang.Object;@6231c0,
>[Ljava.lang.Object;@b0740c, [Ljava.lang.Object;@92c969, [Ljava.lang.Object;@e54d6a]
> [java] got: [[Ljava.lang.Object;@3d96b7, [Ljava.lang.Object;@171fdd8,
>[Ljava.lang.Object;@d08216, [Ljava.lang.Object;@10c7af9, [Ljava.lang.Object;@5da750]
>
>That is, JPOX returns a List of Object[], and the expected is a List of Object[].
>Scanning through the test I don't see evidence that the test is checking the
>results of each Object[], just comparing the object array objects which will
>clearly have different object array references. Can someone please review the
>test, and either correct it if it needs correcting, or get it to give more
>information on the actual error here - is the object returned wrong?, is the
>parameter returned wrong ?
>
>Thx
>--
>Andy
>
>
--
Michael Bouschen Tech@Spree Engineering GmbH
mailto:mbo.tech@spree.de http://www.tech.spree.de/
Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66
Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin
|
|
|
|
|